jo-.o

novio mujer

[TUGO News @TugoNews]

"Me parece importante decir que las políticas de género son una HERRAMIENTA para nosotros, el gobierno nacional las RECORTÓ y hoy estamos llorando una alumna, necesitamos que se deje de ver a la palabra GÉNERO o ESI como una MALA PALABRA"

La maestra de Agostina totalmente rota

[Essential Mastery @EssentialMastry]

Dostoevsky was right; “Every self-betrayal is a sin. Whenever you go against your nature, your body reminds you.”

If you spend enough time with anything, you start liking it, even sadness. So let’s choose people and spaces that truly elevate us. Your peace is worth it.

[Mike Kus @mikekus]

I've just spoken at @webexpo in Prague - this me making my slides for my talk...

[mie @girlpov]

#goodnight

[jo-.o @jokimarce]

No puedo creer el partido que estoy viendo

[Autista @MilanesasyArroz]

@LeanDesignFC

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

[Gastón Deganis @gaston_deganis]

Una ley que prohiba la publicidad generada por IA 🙏🏼🙏🏼

[Jay @cafenoc4lor]

o goat odeia tanto a extrema direita que tá destruindo o real madrid por dentro

[Electropeano ⚡🚬😎🇦🇷 @nottropeano]

Yo lo amo a él.

[jo-.o @jokimarce]

Lamentablemente lo amo

[Actu Foot @ActuFoot_]

🚨🚨 Kylian Mbappé 🇫🇷 : « MOI JE PRÉFÈRE PARLER ICI AVEC VOUS, c’est clair c’est plus direct ! Non ?

JE SAIS QUE BEAUCOUP DE GENS NE PARLENT PAS et JE DOIS LIRE LA PRESSE POUR SAVOIR CE QU’ILS PENSENT. » 😳😱

[El Afro 🚬 @afrotw]

Sigo sorprendido de lo MALA PERSONA que tenés que ser para twittear algo así. Es realmente impresionante

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

Solarpunk is a movement that imagines a sustainable and optimistic future where humanity thrives in harmony with nature.

[FC Barcelona @FCBarcelona]

One big family 🫶

[All day Astronomy @forallcurious]

🚨: Research reveals that focusing on good literally reshapes your brain to seek out even more good.