@OldKnavey@RichardHanania Like Richard says, that’s exactly why so few people are making money in chess ever since IBM beat Kasparov all those years ago….
@arram Reminds me of something Scott Adams said years ago, that our phones were increasingly telling us what to do along multiple dimensions, and that mostly we don’t even recognize it
@realEstateTrent Leisure is always the tradeoff! 100 years ago people thought that we’d only work 10 hours/week in the future with the technological improvements that they saw then.
Largely didn’t work out like that. We seem to want to stay productive.
@aaronsibarium@razibkhan This agreement made many of us loathe the Republican elite in Michigan during our efforts to ban racial preferences in the early 2000s.
Some people had principles, but most were cowards siding with the left.
@kamens@andy_matuschak I wonder who besides mathematicians says ‘this is just our weird hobby’ while not realizing there are real-world impacts of their work. There must be other examples.
Enjoying the spelling bee/hard work discourse lately, and people turning to sports for examples.
We love winners, we love talent, we love hard work, we love to make fun of people who put in work on odd things… but if a person loves their odd thing, we can appreciate it too.
@The_PK_Guy@NathanJRobinson “Negligently” is an intent element, most commonly associated with tort law, but sometimes with crimes. My point is that we typically say that the user commits the crime, not the tool.