Introducing Snubb – a multichain token approval scanner in your terminal.
Inspired by @revokecash – this is an incredibly fast and efficient CLI tool to scan for outstanding token approvals for your address across as many as 70 chains simultaneously.
Try it out now with one terminal command:
npx snubb --address <your-address> --chains 1,10,130
E.g.
npx snubb --address 0x7C25a8C86A04f40F2Db0434ab3A24b051FB3cA58 --chains many-networks
Video in reply showing it in action 👇🔥
It’s lightning fast—able to scan multiple chains and return results in seconds. Under the hood, it uses hypersync queries (by @envio_indexer) to scan entire chains very quickly, with specific filters for approval and transfer events related to the given address.
If you find any outstanding approvals using Snubb, it’s recommended to head to https://t.co/mB1ktwrSRY to easily revoke those approvals.
Share any feedback!
@plondon514 Just as important for LPs to see past behaviour so they can better understand how to LP in future 😄 DM if you want me to share my research on it
Lots and lots powerful goodies.
I.e. you can index factory / metadata events from early blocks while indexing actual swap events from much later blocks, from the SAME contract address.
Not just the fastest, but also the most flexible ...
🎯 Per-event start blocks in HyperIndex
Override contract and chain start blocks on a per-event basis. Useful when you need different historical depth for different events across chains in the same indexer.Set custom start blocks per chain, with TypeScript exhaustiveness checks built in:
Day 3 of interesting @Polymarket strategies I've seen:
A trader made $7m in 21 days
(#33 all time realized PnL rank)
during the 2024 election by arbitraging multiple binary markets that all priced this event (i.e. never betting on who would win).
There stats from Oct 26 → Nov 16 2024:
• 762 USDC splits totalling $15,275,535
• 20,214 simultaneous Trump-YES + Harris-YES sell events
• Sum exceeded $1.00 in 77.9% of them - average 1.00078, max 1.01914 (a 1.91% riskless spread)
• Total fills: 36,740. Volume: $23.24M. 99.9% in two markets.
Looking back and slightly adjusting some assumptions about Day 2's wallet:
The 95% win rate is a selection artifact. Across all 864 positions opened, only 47.3% were on the eventual winner. The "closed bets" count excludes 427 positions flattened pre-resolution at ~zero PnL.
Real edge: tiny mispricing at the bid + fast flatten on bad bets (turns –38¢ losses into –2¢) + hold winners to $1.00. Asymmetric payoff does the rest. The moat is exit speed, not prediction 👀
At least this is what I think ...
@AlgorithmicBot Yeah I'm thinking about it more and relooking into it- i think I've overlooked that they'll sold out various positions not counting towards this win rate. The PnL is correct, but its only heavily analyzing bets held till redemption.