@lindytrader@ScottAdamsSays@Hanjarolol All this talk about the US being invaded at the southern boarder….. we were almost invaded by white supremacists who can’t even get their dicks hard without looking at a picture of Orange Cheeto Man. Stop tweeting me and go jerk off to this picture
@WebbieDedden @PatrickXavier75 @FoxNews You obviously didn’t read the report. Durham literally says on page 295 that the FBI was justified, but it should have been a preliminary investigation.
@FoxNews All investigations have been completely full of political bias and we will not overcome this until these awful and dangerous politicians are voted out. Trump, Biden, Clinton, I’m tried of them all…
@z3u5s@tedlieu Your first point is completely and utterly false and very clearly states in the report that it should have been a preliminary investigation. Read the report.
Durham Report is a big nothing burger.
1. Durham concludes FBI HAD ENOUGH INFORMATION TO OPEN A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION.
2. Durhams recommends no wholesale changes to how FBI handles investigations where the suspect is a politician.
3. Durham report doesn’t charge anyone.
@ScottMahring@danielsgoldman Exposed, yet there are no crimes or charges listed in the report. So who exactly is “exposed” here when the report literally says “I found nothing of value, but I didn’t like the investigation so it shouldn’t have happened”
@HisShadow45@danielsgoldman False. It said the FBI did not have evidence for a full scale investigation. Clearly states they should have started with a preliminary investigation
@MrDocSon @chuckcardoza @RogerJStoneJr Correct. Page 295… very clearly states it should have been a preliminary investigation, not a full scale investigation.