@Helenreflects Yes! I think evidence of this is that there are almost no books on his philosophy without a chapter about his biography and what he was like as a person (the contrast with, say, Kant or Hegel on this is striking)
@Helenreflects Fwiw when I was writing a dissertation on Spinoza I asked my adviser whether it was good —“Yes absolutely” —Ok so I should read it? —“No absolutely not”
If you missed the Method and History of Philosophy conference, given by the Penn Libraries this past April, you can watch the presentations on ENN’s YouTube. Topics covered include what archives are, what they offer, and much more. Explore here: https://t.co/omGklh7WCC
CFA. I'm excited to announce the Call for Abstracts for "Reappearing Ink": Workshop on Early Modern Philosophy and Metaphilosophy. University of Groningen @wijsbegeerte (March 2023). Deadline for submitting abstracts is 9 January. Join us!
https://t.co/BKuX56RgqE
Our letter: "Biotechnology ethics for food and agriculture" with my amazing coauthors Theresa Selfa & Paul B. Thompson, is just out this week in Science: https://t.co/I8QUuGZzBX @SocPhilSciPract @PhilSciAssoc @KBSLTER@CANRatMSU@sunyesf
@inessentials Right before the pandemic, I’d been planning to drive a couple hundred miles to see that book in a library, ideally get some scans. Maybe next year!
@nescio13 Yes, I’m starting to think so, it’s a plausible developmental story and would be a really interesting idea to include in your entry—it would for sure make the exchange with Hudde a much more important moment on the road to the Ethics than I previously thought
@nescio13 Yeah, your (iii) is a solid point. Maybe that overlaps with the objection that Don Garrett considers in his classic paper on that demonstration.