@AlanJLSmith Ed Zitron is doing some incredible work on the underlying financials of AI on his blog - definitely worth a read for those of us integrating AI into many parts of our business.
Token price changes could alter the value proposition quite drastically
https://t.co/nAZyFyYCYQ
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln My point was these a four very different things.
RLI cannot be eradicated - it’s an impossibility baked into the measure itself.
Eradicating Billionaires improves RLI but improves nobodies lives
It’s what makes Corbyn so pernicious
Focusing on the last two is more important
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln It depends how one defines poverty
I’m not being deliberately obtuse here
But to state whether something is a problem you have to define it properly
Financial insecurity, static living standards, the Sisyphusian nature of progressing in life - all problematic but ≠ poverty
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln Notice how during 2010-15 the poverty line decreased?
We were in peak austerity but because the middle got poorer the distance from the bottom to the middle decreased too.
My point is it’s not a very good measure of poverty & is often misunderstood - especially by Corbyn
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln Do you know what that poverty line equates to?
For a single income family anyone earning under £55,000 per year is considered poor. (£31k per annum before housing costs)
£5,000 more you are considered rich enough to have child benefit removed.
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln That’s largely a result of inflation
Global inflation has totalled 30% over the past 5 years. This naturally leads to an increase in Billionaires
Absolute poverty (UK and Global) has declined over the past 15 years
Relative Poverty is stable
Expectations has risen
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln It’s not a view on poverty
It’s a view on comparison
Poverty is a problem buts its a problem not caused by the value of Amazon shares
Rent extraction? Quite possibly
Unproductive use of assets like land banking? Quite possibly
Amazon shares going up in value - not at all
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln Disparity is only bad in so far as it makes one aware their situation could be better.
If we only compared ourselves to rural Zambia we’d be the “Billionaire”
Bezos own c8% of Amazon - the company he founded - how is that hoarding?
Neither of these things increase poverty
@DanOakesBP@nicklincoln I don’t think Nick is saying Poverty is good
He is saying that thinking of Wealth and Poverty as two sides of a zero-sum game is false (in stronger words maybe 🤷♂️)
The value of Amazon shares going up doesn’t remove dollar bills from the pockets of the poor
1/ Pension and Tax nerds - I was asked by a client this week about deliberately exceeding their annual allowance, by some margin, to recover their Personal Allowance and retain Free Childcare Hours for children
My initial instinct was it wouldn’t work but the more I look into it
@Alan_Couzens I’m 6’2,
105kg
17% BF
VO2 Max of 46
Can now manage 90 minutes at 6:20/km pace in Zone 2 but it’s taken three years.
I swim 8km/wk too but never managed to swim Zone 2 - that’s impossible!!!
Imagine if government started giving away Rolex watches. Or if they gave teenagers a loan to buy a Rolex if they wanted one.
The symbolic value of a Rolex would drop through the floor. Fundamentally a Rolex is not intrinsically very valuable but it’s symbolically valuable because it signals status or success for the wearer. All of that would go away if the Government made them easy to obtain.
This is what has happened to the university degree. Prior to the 1970s, a university degree was a symbol that you weren’t poor or slow. The only people who could get a university degree were people who had a higher than average IQ from a wealthier than average family.
The degree itself wasn’t intrinsically very valuable, which is why any degree would do. If you had a French Poetry degree it was enough to signal to an employer that you weren’t poor or stupid and you could then enter the workforce at a higher point than most.
Today that signal is lost. The government has made it so anyone can go to university - even if you are a bit thick. It’s also made it so that if you weren’t poor to begin with, you will be by the time you graduate.
Employers are now skeptical about people with degrees. Today top employers are more interested in people who dropped out to start a business, or who took a year off to be a ski instructor, or who set up a YouTube channel. These are better indicators today of your social standing and your intelligence.
Decades ago the government looked at the economic outcomes of graduates and observed that university grads made more money. So in all their wisdom they tried to make everyone a university grad. They failed to realise that it wasn’t the university education that was causing the uplift, it was the symbolic value of what it secretly said about you.
Now that the symbolic value is lost, the value of a university degree is much lower. It’s as if the government has flooded the market with Rolex watches and forced every young person to buy one at retail prices on a loan.
@DanielPriestley So my 18 year old is going to Uni but only to a course that comes with those signals - exclusivity & cognitive processing
We looked at Apprenticeships but she isn’t ready to “adult” yet
Her friend who has taken a gap year to work out their next move & travel has my full respect
@DanielPriestley As an Employer I value the institution more than the degree
Philosophy from Durham ✅
Philosophy from Canterbury ❌
Because it still signals cognition
I also value the course:
History ✅
Business Administration ❌
Because it signals cognitive reasoning not info regurgitation