@DPGBehler@Sir_Dammed@SmashJT I wanted a game that focused on Kratos’ son (who was revealed to be the god Loki).
I think the way to do this spin-off with Faye is to have some parts that you play as Kratos and some as Faye (like they did with his son).
“[B]ecause all sinned.” Adam brought sin into the world, and physical death via loss of access to the tree of life, but people personally sin when they make bad choices. God doesn’t pretend that people have sinned while in the womb.
@BSD_1984@1984_nate You have to use terrible theology to ignore the verse I quoted.
Federal headship is a philosophical construct. Jesus didn’t need this to do any of what he came to do.
Did Jesus have to be blind to cure blindness?
@BSD_1984@1984_nate To be morally culpable, one has to have the ability to understand. A spiritually blind person would have no sin, per Jesus. By extension, would this not also apply to a spiritually dead person?
@Xtopher_Uzo He hid the meaning of His teaching many times in parables and figurative language.
This was a fulfillment of prophecy that Israel would hear but not understand.
@ProvisionistP@ronhenzel@DBJ540@DBJ540 could have been referring to your second paragraph.
It seems like an easy thing to sort out. I think it takes an apostolic interpretation to not take Jacob/Esau how you do, and I think that an interpretation that doesn’t comport with the OT needs justification.
@mikecheck972@How2BeChristian@ProvisionistP@redeemed_zoomer It’s pretty easy to see the context here. The Eucharist is intrinsically linked to transubstantiation, which explains how people eat Jesus’ body (which of course is mentioned in John 6).
CCC 1376 is one of many paragraphs that discuss this sacrament.
@How2BeChristian@ProvisionistP@redeemed_zoomer Are you arguing that the word “transubstantiation” and a reference to John 6 have to be included in the same paragraph about the Eucharist?
You seem like you are engaging in sophistry in this moment.
The “signs of the bread and the wine” are tied to John 6.
Paciente de 19 anos, fenotipicamente feminina, procurou atendimento ginecológico por amenorreia primária. Relatava desenvolvimento normal de mamas desde a puberdade, porém sempre achou “estranho” nunca ter menstruado. Tinha vida sexual ativa com o namorado há cerca de 1 ano, referindo dificuldade ocasional na penetração profunda, mas sem dor importante. O casal buscou avaliação inicialmente por infertilidade “precoce”, motivada mais pela curiosidade e ansiedade do parceiro.
Ao exame físico, apresentava estatura elevada, mamas bem desenvolvidas (Tanner V), escassa pilificação pubiana e axilar, e genitália externa feminina. O exame ginecológico evidenciou fundo vaginal curto e ausência de colo uterino palpável. Ultrassonografia pélvica não identificou útero ou ovários.
Na investigação laboratorial, destacavam-se níveis de testosterona total de 650 ng/dL (dentro da faixa masculina: ~300–1000 ng/dL), LH elevado (18 mUI/mL) e FSH discretamente aumentado (9 mUI/mL), sugerindo resistência periférica aos andrógenos. O cariótipo revelou 46,XY.
Ressonância magnética identificou estruturas ovais intra-abdominais, próximos aos canais inguinais.
Qual é o diagnóstico?