In the review, I argue that the book provides a novel vision of equality that is the product of collaboration between local governments and their residents -- a more capacious and human vision than the one that arises from courts. 2/2
@jweinsteintull provides a comprehensive study of traffic courts. These courts present new categorical distinctions that suggest novel ways to reform and oversee both traffic courts and the justice system more broadly. https://t.co/LSm1fwu01G
What would an affirmative right to vote look like if it met voters' needs?
We’re reading @ASUCollegeOfLaw Profs. Joshua Sellers and Justin Weinstein-Tull’s “Constructing the Right to Vote” to learn ways to think about building a responsive election system. https://t.co/6jTo2UjVzX
Constitutional structure--federalism and the separation of powers--is a fascinating and important topic. But it can also feel very abstract, sometimes frustratingly so. 1/6
Reasoning from experience, rather than abstract theory, requires us to broaden our structural logic so that humans become its primary input. Doing so provides the foundations for a more inclusive and effective structural constitutional law. 5/6
For the past few years, I've been thinking about some of our smallest courts: traffic courts. These courts govern our daily lives, in a sense. They oversee our mobility, our ability to get around. 1/5
If you are interested in hearing about what I found, please check out my draft about these courts. And if you have thoughts, please be in touch! 5/5 https://t.co/3iwFhduZI9