BREAKING: Trump is hit with more devastating news as Politico reveals that “three Georgia Republicans who falsely claimed to be electors for Donald Trump — and are now charged alongside him in a sprawling racketeering indictment brought by local prosecutors — now say they took the steps they did because Trump, then the sitting president, told them to.”
This could not be worse news for Trump — because his co-conspirators just essentially accused him or masterminding the conspiracy to steal Biden’s win through a slate of “fake electors.”
The Politico report continues, revealing that, “In a series of court filings this week, those false electors, who became part of Trump’s last-ditch bid to subvert the 2020 election, said it was Trump and his campaign lawyers who urged them to sign the false documents, claiming they were necessary to preserve Trump’s flailing court efforts to reverse his defeat to Joe Biden.“
A lawyer of one of the three indicted Georgia “fake electors” even told the court that his client “was acting at the direction of the incumbent president of the United States,” and that “the president’s attorneys instructed Mr. Still and the other contingent electors that they had to meet and cast their ballots on Dec. 14, 2020.”
The other two co-conspirators told the court that they committed their multiple felonies “under the direction of the President Trump.”
That’s right, even Trump’s own co-conspirators have turned on Trump — and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ criminal case against Trump just became a slam dunk.
Please retweet and ❤️ if you think that Trump MUST be found guilty — and consider joining the growing exodus to Tribel, a woke new Twitter competitor that banned Trump for life and is exploding in popularity because Elon Musk banned Tribel’s Twitter account — but he forgot to ban this link to download the new Tribel app: https://t.co/HnJzSKj4Hp
In a new @GeriPalBlog podcast, @joelweissman & @SamirKShahMD discuss how to keep surgery patient-centered when the patient has dementia - how to approach surgical decision-making & when operating isn't the right choice
https://t.co/z01bpnaibq
BREAKING: Jan. 6th committee drops its biggest bombshell yet and announces that they have uncovered enough evidence for the Department of Justice to bring a criminal indictment against Donald Trump — possibly leading to hard prison time. RT IF YOU THINK THAT THE DOJ MUST INDICT!
Consider supporting this effort to encourage Biden Administration to make #COVID19 tests more accessible via direct distribution. Critical for equity. Find the letter here: https://t.co/pG9iJlPHJW
In @Health_Affairs: Researchers from @CSPH_BWH and colleagues identify ways improve the use of new Current Procedural Terminology codes to document receipt of and ensure access to #Medicare advance care planning https://t.co/xkvP2ebiZu
My latest tweets have mostly been bad news, which saddens me, particularly during holiday season.
Today I’ll take you to my Happy Place, with some thoughts on why we could be in good shape – and maybe even great shape – in 6-8 weeks.
A 🧵(1/24)
Group 2 Somewhat protected
Who are they?
Folks with 1-2 shots of a vaccine OR a recent infection
How will they fare?
Large numbers will see breakthrough infections
Severe illness should largely be preventable
High risk folks in this group still at risk of bad outcomes
4/6
"This gradual shift in the volume of surgical cases from MTFs to civilian hospitals has led to a precipitous decline in the clinical preparedness of military surgeons for combat medical care." @jweissman17 shares study findings with @medresearchnews
https://t.co/EM1mC60glI
It’s out!
Medicaid Expansion was not associated with facility-level improvements in access to cancer care for racial/ethnic minorities.
We still need interventions specifically targeting the challenges faced by hospitals that serve a large % of minorities.
@CSPH_BWH@ASCO_pubs
The left often argues that ending driving subsidies - a key move to address climate change - is unjust. This important new piece by @FrontierTony highlights deep flaws in that argument, and is good reading for building a more nuanced take on justice in the broader climate debate.