Code review in 2026:
✅ Diff looks great
✅ Tests pass
✅ 3 AI bots approved
❌ The new code can never actually run
Review the code around the change, not just the change.
🕰️ We made an interactive history of code review: 1976 → today.
From printouts in meeting rooms, to email patches, to CI bots, to multiple AI agents reviewing every PR.
Favorite finding: AI-written PRs get merged 32.7% of the time. Human-written: 84%.
https://t.co/R0zlplEzxU
@andrewchen Definitely an issue that's being worked on.
In the meantime an easy solution is to fire off prompts to the cloud to open PRs and then have an agent merge them in.
@icanvardar You don't have to wait for them to finish. You can run them in a worktree, in the cloud, a second machine, or maybe increase the scope of the work to get more done and go watch a movie 🙂
@Tech_girl Maybe for the same reason folks have subscriptions to Netflix, Apple TV, Disney, etc...
My guess: optionality, variety, affinity, and to avoid lock-in.
🍿
🚀 We've been heads down.
Kai's gone from 0.11 → 0.35:
- Proper benchmark harness (roughly doubled our SWE-- bench pass rate)
- GitHub CI integration
- Lots of new features, lots of issues resolved
More to share soon.