The GRACE project has been working hard tackling underrepresentation in genetics research. We are happy to share an endorsement by our MP for Milton Keynes Central, Emily Darlington.
@OpenUniversity@emily4MK
On the 6th November, we will be attending and exhibiting at the @camraredisease#RareSummit25
Working together to build more inclusive, accessible, and equitable genetics healthcare and research for all.
Come along to our exhibition stand and find our Tree of Traits where you can explore your family features!
Find our more about RARESummit 2025
https://t.co/SXWHKtFMby
I signed up for @ukfuturehealth! If I'm doing public engagement with @GRACE_projectUK to increase diversity in genetics and healthcare research participation, have to practice what I preach!
New paper!
Studying genetics of tooth dimensions isn't so common as measurement is cumbersome. But in our modest-sized study we report many new genes, with one which seems to have been inherited from Neanderthals in (some) Europeans.
https://t.co/yZcmALt3gO
@UGI_at_UCL@OU_STEM
Now that I run a diversity and inclusion initiative about underprivileged groups myself, I try to do as much as I can to counter these pernicious views and their misrepresentation of scientific research.
https://t.co/9vFC1sdazP
The report reminded me that nearly a decade ago I had a weird run-in with these top ‘race scientists’ over my research.
At that point I was new to the UK and also unfamiliar with Twitter, so had no idea who these people were. It started with an innocuous email…
Bigotry dressed up as biology. Summary thread of the Guardian and
@hopenothate's remarkable investigation into the scientific racist and eugenics cosplayers, promoting pseudoscience to disguise their ideology.
Never again have I responded to their emails. They then started pestering other lab members including the professors. But after our coordinated silence it died down after a while.
@peterjukes I think you're not getting the philosophical point (saying everything in science is shaky) I am disagreeing with. Although our general position about moral absolutism is similar. So maybe there's not much point in continuing this back-n-forth.
@peterjukes In my research we see there are observable differences between people. These are facts and concurrently I do outreach explaining that having differences doesn't mean a person or a group of people are inferior in some way. E.g. lactose tolerate and white supremacists milk parties.
@peterjukes I was disagreeing to the earlier blanket assertion of calling all scientific knowledge imperfect: "Never based your moral values an our imperfect and evolving knowledge of science"; as you concur, topics like evolution are established with proof. Am not asking to be absolutist!