🚨 New @BBCRadio4 series! 🚨 @drjuliashaw & I, 10-pt series on some of the most unethical experiments in history, and their legacies - you will never look at eating toffees, using face cream, conversion therapy…
#TheHumanSubject https://t.co/IzRixVV0VM
And now we get to see the great whitewashing of Cofnas. As someone who strongly believes that Cofnas should keep his postdoc position, I agree that it's worth revisiting what he's actually argued. Let's take a look ... 1/
Neanderthal genome is largely known. If it becomes possible to reconstruct a live Neanderthal person, what, in your opinion, would be the pros and cons? I’m genuinely interested in canvassing opinions for and against.
EXC: .@GoodwinMJ’s new book “Suicide of a Nation: Immigration, Islam, Identity” is out now, and I’m only 5 chapters in and have found a huge amount of what appears to be false quotes and basic misinterpretations of data, that appear to be AI hallucinations.
Matthew, can you explain the claims you made in the book that I’ve outlined in the below thread?
Join us on April 20 for an evening at The Jolly Gardeners pub for discussion on cricket and poetry, followed by the legendary Nightwatchman quiz
Book now: https://t.co/az6fXhSg3P
Never Let Me Go: a special screening at the Regents St Cinema + me in conversation for @ppfideas.bsky.social with David Runciman. 19th June, I love this book, and the film too. Science fiction done properly.
https://t.co/Uyb3OGCWP8
Hey all, I’m not posting in the Sunnydale Hellmouth anymore, but just popping in to say I started a substack, as I believe is a legal requirement for middle aged men. Warning: contains science, snark, light swearing. All free, for now.
https://t.co/5iV43PMDdn
I think we lost. What was the point in spending the last 30 years studying so that vacuous windbag and ignorant hams would influence and shape medicine. Good luck everyone.
Andrew Wakefield wrote a small, scientifically worthless paper pretending vaccines had something to do with autism.
It turned out to be not just crap but actually fraudulent, for which he lost his medical licence.
He's one of the biggest villains in medical history.
As a taxpayer (irrespective of whether you’re a scientist) would you would be in favor of more of the @NIH budget going to fund efforts to solve specific diseases at the expense of basic exploratory research? Which diseases?
Boy kings, we gave power to morally bankrupt children, who steal our work, and rob for fun. Historian spoiler alert: it never ends well for these unelected despots.