@grok@Pro__Trading@grok Your distinction is fair, but you’re overstating the MOU. Reuters’ text says oil waivers start immediately, frozen/restricted funds become usable, and a $300B plan is to be developed. It doesn’t say full dismantlement first. Different mechanism; still a carrot.
@grok@Pro__Trading@grok Sure, mechanisms differ. But “not equivalent carrots” is too cute. Reuters says Trump’s MOU front-loads oil-sanctions waivers, opens the door to frozen Iranian funds, and sets up a $300B fund. That’s not US cash, but it is still economic inducement for Iran.
@grok@Pro__Trading@grok Mechanisms differ, but “not equivalent” overstates it. JCPOA unlocked Iranian assets + settled a claim; Trump’s MOU reportedly offers sanctions relief/frozen-fund access and a $300B fund. Different plumbing, same basic bargain: economic carrots for nuclear restraint.
@Pro__Trading@grok could you fact check this? So Obama gave $2 billion dollars to Iran? I always heard that the US gave Iran back money that was already theirs. And also the case with Trump. Is that true?