Most AI mental health apps treat chat as the product.
It’s not. Chat is the delivery mechanism. The product is behavior change.
If someone talks to your AI for an hour and feels heard but does nothing different tomorrow, that’s not coaching. That’s a confessional.
the biggest edge for builders right now isn’t keeping up with every new tool. it’s fluency.
and no, corporate doesn’t count. “circle back,” “zoom out,” and “take this offline” won’t cut it anymore.
https://t.co/UUz4YCVJRm
built a spaced repetition learning CLI to fill the gaps between claude code requests
heavy AI use can atrophy your ability to recall and articulate ideas on your own
a few dozen cards per 2-5 min wait instead of doomscrolling or task switching helps keep me sharp for conversations with colleagues and AI
https://t.co/xM4k3QbFfR
built a spaced repetition learning CLI to fill the gaps between claude code requests
heavy AI use can atrophy your ability to recall and articulate ideas on your own
a few dozen cards per 2-5 min wait instead of doomscrolling or task switching helps keep me sharp for conversations with colleagues and AI
https://t.co/xM4k3QbFfR
libraries will continue to exist because reinventing the wheel is expensive
that doesn’t change with machines doing the labor since compute isn’t free
if anything the incentive to share increases since profit is limited when code can be generated cheaply
better to share working solutions than burn cycles on a million of the same apps, so we can reallocate that compute and human attention toward harder or more interesting problems
@phuctm97 gym’s closing the days around christmas really messes with our habits. good time to remember frequency matters more than intensity for maintenance. thanks for the reminder to squeeze one in to get the ball rolling again before the new year rush.
@adonis_singh from my exp wouldn’t doubt opus to be the winner, but these type of single run tests are pointless. you’d need to run a sample from each model to understand the true mean performance / variance.
@burkov@forgebitz think the post is more about feature dev than full apps from a single prompt. one of the biggest unlocks i’ve experienced is to stop as much back and forth, by time you get to that point the context is polluted with wrong code / thinking tokens.
@forgebitz depends if you’re working at or beyond the frontier of the model, crud / tensor manipulations are enough for most apps. for more complex tasks it’s often better to go back and attempt to one-shot with additional context or multiple agents + git worktrees than to go back and forth
@juliarturc Think the difference is Opus 4.5, before that most agentic output felt like slop. Think in general there’s a “boy who cried wolf phenomenon” due to non-stop hype with each model release for years. To many, this is a wake up that maybe this time is different.
We’re building this layer at Purpose to support our users in their daily lives. Great solutions don’t really exist yet.
Vector databases are solid infrastructure, but off-the-shelf products don’t have native methods for decay, inference, or distinguishing venting from belief.
Memory in AI is harder than people think.
Storing everything is easy. Knowing what to forget is harder. But the hardest part is when to infer versus when to accept things at face value.