Kevin Anantha

Frontend

[Kevin Anantha @kevanantha]

pi ftw

[Kevin Anantha @kevanantha]

idr goes hard 🫪🤙

[Chubby♨️ @kimmonismus]

This is hilarious. This is what AI was made for.

I love it. 100% accurate.

[viconk @viconkchalant]

INI SIAPA YANG BUAT COOO 🫵😭

[The Spectator Index @spectatorindex]

🇮🇩 Indonesia's rupiah falls to record low of 17,720 per US Dollar.

[Mom @mom_agency_]

Claude's first day at Dunder Mifflin

[Kevin Anantha @kevanantha]

🤣🤣🤣

[@levelsio @levelsio]

@Bankless @diogenes @patagon Most annoying haircut I've ever seen in my life

[txt gajelas @txtdarigajelas]

pentingnya belajar basic english

[Elias Al @iam_elias1]

Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy.

Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes.

The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled.
The conclusion is one sentence.
"At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand."

An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody.
Here is how you get there.
A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself.

Because the workers who were fired were also customers.
When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation.

The loop has no natural exit.
The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements.
Every single one failed in the model.
The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger.

No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it.
Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion."
Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem.

Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it.
Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place.

Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·
https://t.co/4m8E9jQNYm

[Cursor @cursor_ai]

We've also added multi-root workspaces for cross-repo changes.

A single agent session can now target a reusable workspace made of multiple folders.

[Kevin Anantha @kevanantha]

lewis looks so happy man

[Autism Capital 🧩 @AutismCapital]

🚨 NEW: Sam Altman and Dario Amodei refuse to hold hands at the AI Impact Summit 2026 in Delhi 😂 😂 😂

[gigi gojo ꕤ @polartaegi]

panda your father is alive

[Kevin Anantha @kevanantha]

TIL ab XMLHttpRequest, the only way (maybe) to show a progress bar during uploads

[Klara @klara_sjo]

The mafia is coming for this man

[Mohi @mohithegoat]

who keeps making these 😭😭😭

[𝓒𝓸𝓶𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻 🏴‍☠️ @c0mmandderr]

I sleep good at night knowing this joke will never die.