@orca_island@KenRoth Military Commissions Act (MCA) are military tribunals and therefore the entirety of the bill of rights - more specifically the 6th amendment - does that not apply. Hence, it has taken decades.
@PaulSaxMD I'm not American but doesn't consulting ID usually lead to better outcomes for the patient? I see OI consults critical just liked ID consults for Staph Aureus bacteremia.
@m4h007 I remember her online presence back in the 2010s when Israel wanted to attack Iran during Obama. I could not have expected her to become a WINEP advocate.
@ShahyadAryamehr does abolishment of all but one political party count? Does forcing constitutional amendments under martial law count? Yes, definitely a dictatorship
The @IDF response to my question about the attack on the Pasteur Institute: "The IDF struck a military headquarters of the Iranian terror regime in Tehran, which the regime deliberately constructed near the Pasteur Institute."
My follow up: From the videos and images available, we can see that the Institute was destroyed, but not any of the surrounding buildings. Did the IDF miss or mistake its intended target? Also, there are no publicly visible military headquarters near the Institute as far as I can tell. If anyone knows of it, please share.🙏
Their response to my follow up: "We have no further comment."
@aliemamiofnyc Abrahamian (2013) directly refutes this. While Plan A technically failed on 25 Mordad, the CIA pivoted to 'Plan B'—using black propaganda and $1M+ to hire fake 'communist' mobs. This manufactured the 'fear of chaos' that triggered the 28 Mordad coup
@Pouriaaa You're defending a 'legal' act that required a foreign intelligence agency to draft, a terrified King to sign in secret, and a military coup to enforce.
In Belgium or the Netherlands, a Royal Decree without a Minister's signature is a scrap of paper.
@Pouriaaa .. Royal Decree without a countersign is legally dead. By bypassing Art 45 in 1953, the Shah wasn't 'exercising' the constitution—he was abandoning the very European model Iran had instituted
@Pouriaaa You’re quoting Art 46 but ignoring Art 45, which states all royal decrees are invalid unless countersigned by a Minister. The 1953 dismissal had no countersign. By the very legalist standard you're using, the decree was a scrap of paper.
@Pouriaaa If this was a 'clear constitutional authority,' name one time between 1906 and 1953 a Shah successfully used a firman to fire a PM who held a parliamentary majority. You can’t. Custom and law (Art 44) dictated the Shah reigns, not rules. 1953 wasn't a 'decree'; it was a CIA-putsc
@Pouriaaa Calling the 1949 amendments a mere 'strengthening' of the monarchy is a massive distortion. You don’t declare martial law to pass 'clarifications'—you do it to seize powers the 1906 framework never intended for the Shah. FYI The Royal "firman" was written by the CIA.