They’re rapidly moving down east - the oil belt. The other day, they hit multiple locations in Enugu, which has suffered a great deal from these terrorists. Now they’re hitting oil-rich Delta back to back. But it’s $9m image laundering campaign in the U.S. that Nigeria is more interested in. Where is the seriousness?
@POTUS@SecRubio@SecWar@RepRileyMoore@TomColeOK04@RepFranklin@FoxNews
🔰#Update : Thailand is planning to launch another offensive attack on Cambodian soil according to the information received at 10:49 on 03 August @DefenceHQ@MalaysiaPMO@IntlCrimCourt
https://t.co/L3YzK7ue3A
Breaking News !
Since July 31st, the Nigerian military has been heavily assaulting several villages in Isiagu, Ebonyi State, and this morning, they are setting fire to the homes of people suspected of being IPOB members.
Reports indicate that they have set fire to at least 5 houses this morning in the Isiagu community of Ebonyi State and villagers have evacuated from their homes into the bushes because of heavy military shooting this morning.
@real_IpobDOS@AnambraNewMedia@radiobiafralive@FrancisNwifuru@IgboHistoFacts@mfa_russia@MFA_China
France has officially handed over its only military base in Ivory Coast, marking the end of its decades-long presence.
The Ivorian flag was raised at the base as defense ministers from both nations signed the transfer agreement.
French Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu said some 80 French servicemen will continue to stay in the country to advise and train the Ivorian military, while the remaining soldiers will withdraw gradually throughout 2025.
"France is transforming its presence, France is not disappearing,” he said. About 1,000 French soldiers were deployed in Port- Bouët and helped in the fight against jihadists, who regularly launch attacks across the wider region. New military cooperation agreements were signed at the ceremony between the two countries, with both sides stressing that relations between them remain warm.
@real_IpobDOS@radiobiafralive
IPOB Backs Leader On Recusal Order Against Judge Binta Nyako, Says Chief Judge Ignorant On Dictates Of The Law
The Indigenous People Of Biafra (IPOB) movement has backed its incarcerated leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on his position against the further precedence of justice Binta Murtala-Nyako on his case versus the federal government.
Recall that on 10th February 2025, after a summon from the recused federal high Court judge, the IPOB leader objected against his continued trial by justice Nyako citing law stances on why such is an affront to the rule of law, this however led to an indefinite adjournment by the recused justice Nyako on that same day.
Subsequently, he, Nnamdi Kanu, also issued a comprehensive public letter insisting on a fair trial based on the dictates and tenets of the rule of law, vowing to object against any state-induced conspiracy and weaponization of the Nigerian judiciary against him.
On this premises, the IPOB movement through its media and publicity secretary, Comrade Emma Powerful issued a press statement backing its leader and condemning the conspiracy and disregard for rule of law by justice Binta Murtala-Nyako, the Chief Judge of the Federal high Court, and the chairman of the Nigerian Body of Benchers, stating the trio are hellbent on destroying what is left of the dying integrity of the Nigerian judiciary.
The statement reads,"It has come to the attention of the noble family of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) as a shock that those charged with safeguarding the integrity of what is left of the judiciary in Nigeria are the very people doing their damnest to destroy whatever lingering shred of integrity the judiciary may have left.
"It is mind blowing that a sitting high court judge, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria and the Chaiman of the Body of Benchers of Nigeria amongst themselves cannot fathom that a subsisting court order- a consenting judgement for that matter cannot be set aside even on appeal without first obtaining the leave of the trial court. This is nursery school law that doesn't require detailed explanation."
"The fact that a whole Chief Judge of the Federal High Court in Nigeria brazenly disregarded a valid order of court, without first setting aside the order through a legally valid due process is indicative of the chaos and poor knowledge of the law that fuel the epidemic of state sponsored judicial banditry in Nigeria."
The statement went on to decry the adamance of legal experts and luminaries within the Nigerian judiciary in condemning what it described as 'show of shame' and demand for public, independent inquiry. The statement clarified that the Supreme Court was the first to condemn justice Nyako over her prejudicial dispositions against Mr Kanu, even before the IPOB Leader requested for her recusal from his case which she obliged with a judicial pronouncement as an order of recusal.
"It is scandalous that up until now, 7 days after such show of shame, leading lights within the legal profession have not called for a public independent inquiry into the circumstances surrounding such blatant and shameless attempt to subvert the course of justice in full view of the world."
"For the avoidance of doubt, we wish to place it on record that it was the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the highest court in the land in a judgement that determined that the impartiality of Justice Binta Nyako is suspect. This formed the basis of her recusal which she did not contest. She entered an order of court, which is law, that she would no longer preside over the case of our leader Onyendu Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
"Why Chief Judge John Tsoho decided on his own to ignore a ruling made by the highest court (Supreme Court), a subsisting court order recusing Justice Binta Nyako and a key section of the law that governs the conduct of judges, is a question only John Tsoho can answer. But at least this episode has exposed the rot and decay at the very heart of the judiciary especially in Abuja where the government it seems would do any and everything to subvert the rule of law."
The statement insists that justice Nyako stands recused from the case of the IPOB leader, and that the impunity and conspiracy within the elements of the Nigerian judiciary shall not prevail.
"One thing is certain, this impunity will not stand because common law which is what Nigeria practices are predicated on common sense and it is a notorious fact that no judge can sit in judgement over his own case."
"Therefore asking Binta Nyako to review her own order of recusal without following due process of law is dead on arrival. Binta Nyako's order of recusal in conjuction with Supreme Court decision on the issue of her bias againt Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and the key provision of the National Judicial Policy especially Section 1 (c) is enough to deny Binta Nyako jurisdiction to preside over this matter."
Family Writers Press International
OPEN LETTER TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC
By: Mazi Nnamdi Kanu
Greetings to all men and women of goodwill in Nigeria and elsewhere in the world.
I have been compelled by the events of the past few days to take the unusual step of writing this Open Letter for the singular purpose of calling the attention of the general public to the serial executive and judicial fraud being perpetrated against me since my extraordinary rendition in 2021. The details are as follows:
1, In a judgment entered on 1st March 2017, the Federal High Court Abuja ruled that the “IPOB is not an unlawful group”. At the time, it received widespread publicity which can be verified from: https://t.co/3zLtjtP68v. This landmark ruling (made by the court before it turned unjust) emanated in a criminal proceedings that required “proof beyond reasonable doubt” and in which the federal government and my humble self presented our respective cases. Alas! Instead of the federal government to go on appeal as the law mandated (if they are dissatisfied with the judgment), the former Attorney-General (Abubakar Malami) went behind closed doors with a letter signed by late Abba Kyari and got IPOB proscribed/tagged a terrorist group in an ex parte proceedings conducted without notice to me or to the IPOB. This abominable incident was the earliest sign yet that the government and its judiciary have struck an unholy and fraudulent alliance to deny me my rights and thereby imperil the lives and liberty of millions who identity with IPOB.
2. On 26th October 2022, a Federal High Court declared my extraordinary rendition and detention as unconstitutional, stating that: “the manner of arrest and detention of the Applicant (Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) in Kenya, his continued detention in Abuja, his subjection to physical and mental trauma by the Respondents, the inhuman and degrading treatment meted out to the Applicant amounts to a brazen violation of the Applicant's fundamental right to dignity of his person and threat to life under Section 34 (1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended)”. The Court further ordered the federal government to apologize to me and pay me compensation. In a responsible and well-ordered society, run by a responsible government, this judgment is sufficient to have ended my lengthy detention and encourage the federal government to constructively engage me on the issue of the self-determination agitation that triggered this whole saga.
3. Pedal back to 13th October 2022 when the Court of Appeal held that: “The Courts must never shy away from calling the executive to order when they resort to acts of "executive lawlessness". The duty of the Courts is to maintain a balance between ensuring that law and order is obeyed and the protection of the individual from oppressive actions by the executive. By the forcible abduction and extraordinary rendition of the Appellant (Mazi Nnamdi Kanu) from Kenya to this country on the 27th day of June 2021, in violation of international and state laws, the lower Court or indeed any Court in this country is divested of jurisdiction to entertain charges against the Appellant”. Despite the clarity of this judgment and its comportment with reason, the federal government refused to release me from detention while it went behind closed doors and connived with three other justices of the court of appeal who fraudulently and swiftly sat on appeal over the judgment and practically destroyed it by issuing what they termed “a stay of execution”. One may then ask: Is it not abominable for a court to stay a judgment the government already disobeyed? In a plethora of cases, the Supreme Court has held that anybody who disobeys a related court order cannot be given any judicial relief until such order is obeyed. This is a sound reasoning that applied to everybody but is fraudulently overlooked when it comes to my case.
A THREAD … Concluded in the next tweet.
On this 7th day of Free Mazi Nnamdi Kanu's campaign, we will have a task to perform.
And that task is this.
Make a post on your wall asking @AmnestyNigeria and @amnesty to remember that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a prisoner of conscience. Ask them to talk about the injustice against Mazi Nnamdi.
Are you in?
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanu #JusticeForAll
Elochukwu Ohagi, Philosopher, Teacher and Activist, 2025.
Open Letter To @Fendi To Take Over The Legal Bills Of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu…
Dear Fendi ,
I trust this letter finds you in the best of spirits, perhaps sipping an espresso in your chic Milan office or sketching the next iconic design that will grace the world’s runways, or Nigerian High courts.
I say Nigerian high court because our mutual acquaintance, Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, the Nigerian-British activist, has become your most popular model, regularly appearing in Nigerian courts donning your signature white tracksuit with a touch of gold and black. The freedom fighter, also labelled secessionist, has consistently marketed your brand since his arrest, or what some lawyers call extraordinary rendition.
No celebrity in history has repeatedly appeared in public bathed in the same Fendi outfit as much as Nnamdi Kanu.
His unwavering commitment to your brand, even in the face of adversity, is nothing short of commendable.
However, on a more somber note, legal battles are neither glamorous nor inexpensive. The costs associated with mounting a defense can be overwhelming. Considering Mr. Kanu’s circumstantial yet impactful role as your unofficial brand ambassador, bringing Fendi into the limelight in the most unexpected venues, will it not be fitting for Fendi to consider supporting him in his legal journey? After all, not all heroes wear capes; some wear Fendi.
Hell no, I’m not a supporter of Nnamdi Kanu neither have I ever owned a Fendi myself. This letter is not inspired by your luxurious fashion but by my zealous passion.
In the spirit of compassion and recognizing the unintentional yet profound brand loyalty displayed, my selfless but entrepreneurial thought was that perhaps Fendi could see this as an opportunity to stand by one of its most unexpected, unintended and circumstantial ambassadors. It’s a gesture that would resonate deeply with the millions of people who consider Nnamdi Kanu their Saviour, blending the worlds of fashion and revolution. If you do a little bit of research, you’ll agree that any financial investment made to recognise Nnamdi Kanu as your ambassador could become your best marketing strategy especially among Nigerians who are scattered all over the world.
Dear Fendi, I know our paths have never crossed but if you use any Linux based server, you probably may have benefited from a technology I once contributed to. I’m the most vocal FOSS evangelist in Africa. I am the most visible Transhumanist in the continent of Africa. I co-founded Transhuman Coin and I lead Gembok Group, a South African Technology conglomerate.
Thank you for considering this unusual but heartfelt appeal. At the end of the day, it’s these unique threads that create the most impactful brand patterns.
My name is Charles Awuzie and I think Fendi owes Nnamdi Kanu. Share if you want to see Fendi contribute to free Nnamdi Kanu.
#FreeNnamdiKanu
"Nigeria is the headquarters of corruption in the world....this is my country but I am saying this and if you want me to prove it to you I will prove it to you"---BREKETE FAMILY.
DO YOU AGREE WITH HIM?
"It is often said that in Nigeria, the constitution is like a traffic light at a busy intersection mostly ignored, except when convenient. And in the case of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), it seems the government prefers to treat the very laws it swore to uphold as a suggestion rather than a binding social cum political contract."
~Family Writers Press International
They have killed your friend. Boko haram has dislodged us, a full battalion. Nigerian soldier who sounds like a Boko haram sympathiser heard while he makes a video showing the destruction of Boko haram . They have dislodged us and carry all our armouries he said.
Watch
I warned and I promised to use my page to publish it when it starts .
I am keeping to my promise.
.
It is unprofessional to use militia to fight insecurity..Asari Dokubo himself is a hater and Islamic extremist that shouldn't be trusted.
Terrible ! Innocent people are paying heavily. The rain of destruction will continue until Ndi Anambra stands up and stop Soludo from using Asari Dokubo Militia against our people.
Nnamdi Kanu was absolutely right
Today I asked artificial intelligence if the Nigerian Chief Judge has the constitutional and legal rights to dismiss an order of the court.
Read it's reply below 👇
"The Nigerian Chief Judge's authority to dismiss an order of the court is limited. According to Nigerian law, a court's judgment or order can only be set aside or dismissed under specific circumstances, such as:
- *Error in judgment*: If the judgment was based on an error of law or fact ¹.
- *Lack of jurisdiction*: If the court lacked the jurisdiction to make the order in the first place ¹.
- *Nullity*: If the order was obtained by fraud or is a nullity ¹.
In these cases, the Chief Judge or an appellate court may have the authority to set aside or dismiss the order. However, this authority is not absolute and is subject to the principles of law and the court's rules.
It's also important to note that the Chief Judge cannot unilaterally dismiss an order without following the proper legal procedures. The court's rules and procedures must be followed to ensure that justice is served and the rights of all parties are protected."
ME: Nnamdi Kanu was correct when he said that the chief judge has no right to use "Stupid Memo" to dismiss an order of the court. He equally tells Binta Nyako to Appeal her judgement before she can sit on her case
Watch this video again .
What do you think