You demanded "decorum" from me a few posts back. Now it's f-bombs?😂
To your challenge: you studied software engineering fine, I'll drop "expert." Then you already know I can't show you the lines that corrupt elections, and neither can you. That was my entire point. Which you probably knew but wanted to pretend you got me. I'll concede my late-night "source code count" was loose wording but the point stands: the source code is proprietary and sealed. No voter, no candidate, no election judge in Texas can read it, see it, or audit it. You just made my argument.
And I don't need to show you a malicious line to make the case. A system is defective if an undetected alteration could change the outcome- you don't have to prove one did, you have to be unable to rule it out. On a ballot count no citizen can observe, no one can. In our default system, hand-counted paper, conducted and watched by citizen officers, the people can see it all.
The checks built to substitute for public witness are broken too. Texas's own examiner, Brian Mechler, documented that ES&S's hash-validation script reports "MATCH" even when the reference file is completely missing. This is the check meant to prove the running software matches what was certified. On the EVS 6.3.0.0 upgrade, ES&S reset the protective counter, the lifetime fraud-detection count required under Tex. Elec. Code §122.033; the state's elections director confirmed the reset in letter with SOS letterhead and in emails we got through piap requests.
So no, this was never about whether I can read code. Oooh, you got me: I can't read code. Neither can most Texas voters. But the mechanisms built to substitute for that failed. Curse all you want. It doesn't make an invisible count witnessable.
We can agree our country is being destroyed from within and the person testifying, that you attacked and insulted, drove to Austin to try to save it from being destroyed by secret ballot counting and unverifiable election results.
Have a nice day.
@MikeBoard1200@plesafortexas At this point, there is more evidence the elections are rigged than there is that they are free and fair. Anyone who has ever closely looked at election data understands this.
In Savannah, Georgia, during the 2020 Election, a smart thermostat located in an election precinct tabulation room was found connecting to a tabulation server and transmitting those votes back to China.
Votes from 29 states were also found being sent to a sever owned by Clarity Elections in Frankfurt, Germany, with a "harvester," or malware, that was collecting their credentials from all the counties that reported to it.
This allows votes to be changed by backloading them right back down into the counties. A full network grid was able to be traced, which shows all the connections and countries connected to U.S. elections and voting companies like Dominion.
Dominion and other voting systems were found with direct connections to Belgrade, Serbia, Liechtenstein, Pakistan, Iran, Venezuela, China, Canada, and many more. This creates backdoors into our election systems, right here in the United States.
Here it is:
CONFIRMED BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT:
The State Government of Arizona has been toppled.
An expert who has certified Arizona voting machines for the last nine years CONFIRMS that the error on Election Day, November 8, 2022, which crippled 260 of the 446 voting machines in GOP areas, “that error was intentional.”
Additionally, a RUNBECK WHISTLEBLOWER:
CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT
That Runbeck printed approximately 300,000 ballots and illegally inserted them into the tally—not coming from drop boxes, not coming from polling locations, but instead being brought in by employees—for the Arizona 2022 General Election, effectively overthrowing the state government of Arizona.
📝@KariLake is the only candidate in U.S. history to hold the offices of governor and senator simultaneously.
State AGs Are Lawyering Up to Block Basic Election Security. Here’s Why DHS Said Enough Is Enough
Elections aren't just administrative tasks - they are designated Critical National Security Infrastructure. DHS has not only the right, but the duty, to secure them.
Yet when DHS & FEMA attached strict security conditions to federal grants to protect our voting rolls, state officials chose to lawyer up instead of stepping up.
Here is the truth about what is happening, and why local accountability is our only path forward:
Because election systems are critical infrastructure, federal funding should come with common-sense baseline security. DHS and FEMA rolled out new funding conditions requiring states to secure their processes to receive full grants:
· Paper Ballots: Ditch unverified barcodes/QR codes for clear, hand-marked paper ballots.
· Non-Citizen Verification: Use federal databases (like SAVE) to audit voter rolls and vet poll workers.
· Mandatory Audits: Conduct 5% manual post-election audits before certifying.
· Full Reconciliation: Match exact vote counts to verified voters across every jurisdiction.
The Policy Timeline
· June 24: FEMA issues the Homeland Security Grant Program guidelines, tying 20% of funding to critical election security baselines.
· Mid-July: DHS details the requirements and restricts CISA cybersecurity aid to states actively checking non-citizen status on voter rolls.
· Past Week: Instead of working with DHS to secure our elections, a coalition of state AGs and governors filed federal lawsuits to strike down the conditions.
While state politicians "lawyer up" to block these safeguards, the pattern on the ground is even worse.
Securing our elections is not a partisan issue - it is a duty.
Unite4Freedom has championed Election Validity and Election Security for 3 years. Our analysis is undeniable, objective proof that the system needs reform. Millions of registration errors and issues across the country is not acceptable. Whether at the federal, state, or local level, election authorities must stop deflecting, accept accountability, and do the hard work required to deliver valid, certifiable, and completely transparent elections.
No more excuses. No more finger-pointing. Step up and secure the vote.
#ElectionValidity
#Unite4Freedom
#CriticalInfrastructure
#ElectionSecurity
@atensnut I stopped going to the doctor, stopped getting their expensive tests, stopped getting vaccinated and stopped taking prescription medication. I now believe they want to kill us.
Are you aware that China paid CBS to facilitate the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020?
@C__Herridge: “CBS executives deliberately buried the Hunter Biden laptop story and ordered her [Catherine Herridge] to wait until after the 2022 midterms to help the Democratic Party.”
In other words, not only did Christopher Wray have conclusive forensic evidence, but so did CBS.
By the way, the 51 intelligence officials should be tried for the crime of sedition.
You don't know how Egregious a violation this was. Insertion of ballots by employees of a company who also has access to all voter signature exemplars. This alone should have triggered a criminal investigation. Just ignored by the court. 🤬
🔥I joined @TracySabolDC -- MAYOR MAMDANI IS A LIAR & HIS ELECTION WAS NOT LEGITIMATE!
7% of the voters DO NOT EXIST
6% of the voters have FAKE SSNs
10% of the voters were NOT IN NYC in 2025
🇺🇸We MUST help DOJ find MORE FAKE VOTERS:
https://t.co/0GtTruKC2n
This evidence was referred to @NDNYnews John Sarcone and @FBI who are aggressively investigating.
They must prosecute the election officials who betrayed the people, betrayed the law, AND LET THIS HAPPEN⚖️
Executive Summary: Systemic Voter Roll Failures Demand Nation-Wide Transparency
First, they found 6,600 non-citizens on New Jersey’s voter rolls and called it a minor vendor glitch. Then the federal database query dropped: over 19,000 matches and up to 35,000 estimated invalid registrations.
Every time a fraction of the corruption or incompetence gets exposed, officials claim the system has been swept and fixed. Then a real audit happens, and the numbers double, triple, or quadruple.
This isn't just a New Jersey problem. It's a systemic national crisis.
At Unite4Freedom, our data forensics team has conducted rigorous, state-by-state record analyses in 35 states. What we’ve uncovered is staggering: there is not a single state we have analyzed - Red, Blue, or anywhere in between - that currently meets the legal standard for a certifiable, legally compliant election.
From invalid addresses and missing identity checks to duplicate records and non-citizen registrations, state voter databases across the country are riddled with systemic errors.
We are witnessing a complete loss of administrative control over our nation's election infrastructure. If a government cannot guarantee who is on its voter rolls, it cannot guarantee the legitimacy of its outcomes. Treating these massive database failures like routine accounting errors is no longer an option.
Until every state takes the necessary, uncompromising steps to enforce valid, transparent, and fully auditable elections, no one can prove that our election results truly reflect the will of the American people.
@Unite4Freedom is fighting to restore actual integrity to our republic - demanding clean rolls, strict compliance, and 100% auditable results.
Clean the rolls.
Enforce the law.
Verify the vote.
#Unite4Freedom
#Transparency
#ElectionValidity
HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.
Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible],
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent], and
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US
AND MY FAVORITE:
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though. Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so — but it’s worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?