b00ts

Blah blah blah

[Pippa Malmgren @DrPippaM]

I’m afraid your track record on research is so weak that it is impossible to take you seriously. Your decision to assume certain conclusions keeps undercutting your arguments. Your lack of proper investigation and quickness to condemn is itself a very intriguing tell.

The key is there are questions in the markets about the safety of scientists operating at the frontiers of tech. Until the markets see a more decisive commitment to investigations and explanations, given the level of security clearances and the subject matter involved, there will be questions even if it is a case of apophenia.

To remind you of your previously unfortunate conclusions, where you suggested my Dad did not work on nuclear matters during the Cuban Missile Crisis, nor with Richard Bissell or Herman Khan, I attach these. Of course, you never asked for any documentation before publishing, and were careful to publish after his passing to avoid defamation charges.
@Halsrethink

[Sound, Light & Frequency @hollywoodufos]

Almost five years ago, I got so fed up with the inaccuracies that Neil deGrasse Tyson was saying in the media about the UFO/UAP topic that I challenged him to a public debate on the issue. It was contained in a Medium article and in a letter I mailed him. Here's the link: https://t.co/AuDvvavB4z

Dr. Tyson never got back to me. But now that he's promoting a new book, and hitting the talk show circuit big-time, let me renew the challenge...

"Dr. Tyson, come on Need to Know, and we'll block out two hours and go at it. It'll be civilized and polite, we can impose time limits on our answers, but let's try to take the issue seriously and shed more light than heat."

[b00ts @knightseeee]

@VettedPodcast So sick and tired of hearing opinions from someone with a limited vocabulary. "Bombshell" or "I don't know just asking questions yawl"

[UAP Files @UAPFilesPodcast]

What I find most interesting about this situation isn’t the insights from Tim G or SK, it’s the difference of reporting by @ddeanjohnson and this unusual angle he’s taking. It’s quite telling.

Doug prides himself on his “receipts” and documented evidence, FOIA and a traceable narrative in his previous reporting.

But in this case, he’s taking 2 “trust me bro’s” from two people Congress have questioned their integrity on numerous times (SK/TP).

But importantly, disregarded the only person who’s bringing receipts - @GallaudetTim

It’s almost like Doug has taken a side in his reporting. I’d have said this to him in the replies, but he’s switched them off. You’d think a reporter would want contact. Especially from someone who he’s used in his reporting.

TG has said it wasn’t about a job and wasn’t in SK’s office. He’s shown a Teams meeting to support this, and my response from Chris Mellon indicates there was no job talk.

That’s 2 people and a receipt for TG. Doesn’t that trump 2 people and no receipts?

I’m sure at this stage Doug is attempting to corroborate TG’s account, not just SKs. Right? 🤔 👀

[The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford @GoodTroubleShow]

Let’s be clear. Dean Johnson is compromised.

2 or so years ago he had a surrogate reach out to me to ask that I stop posting negative comments such as questioning who he was really working for.

It’s all hands on deck at the legacy program to defend Sean Kirkpatrick because he is their messenger.

[Graham Hancock @Graham__Hancock]

Attn @FlintDibble : (1) you have been boasting and preening for nearly two years that you "won" your debate on the JRE with me and that your self-proclaimed brilliant performance "tanked" my audience. Usually, it is the loser of a debate, not the winner, who asks for a second round. I must therefore assume that your petulant demands to go "face to face" with me again mean you’ve known all along that you failed yourself and embarrassed your profession very badly when you sat down with me for JRE 2136 and that everything you've said on the matter since then is simply the smelly gas of a deeply insecure man. (2) In your pinned post of March 10th 2026 you accuse me of cowardice and lack of integrity and claim that I "rejected two different offers to go face to face” with you "on major, international media outlets". From whence came the “two different offers” for me to go face to face with you in a second debate? When and where were these “offers” made? And in what way, where, did I reject these offers? (3) For the avoidance of future doubt let me be clear. I am content for JRE 2136, the debate that you claim you won, to stand as the permanent record of what passed between us and to continue to allow those who are still interested to make up their own minds on the matter. I see no point in sitting down with you again to accommodate your neediness.

[Post Disclosure World @PostDisclosure]

I didn't cover this story, but I'd find it disingenuous if anyone gives this person a hard time while having made YouTube videos about it with sensational titles designed to maximize clicks, only to play skeptic in the actual video. You can't have it both ways. I'm not defending bad sourcing. But if you rode the same wave for engagement, maybe sit this one out.

[Jesse Michels @AlchemyAmerican]

Live on YouTube in 15 minutes!

[Ricky Gervais @rickygervais]

This wasn't allowed in public incase it offended anyone.
So please don't retweet it. Thanks 🙏https://t.co/1stbtsOxvz

[Brian Krassenstein @krassenstein]

I was one of Trumps biggest supporters. I defended him through everything. Media attacks, investigations, indictments, nonstop chaos.

I stuck by him because I believed he was different. I believed he was going to drain the swamp. I believed he was going to expose the corruption. I believed he was going to take down the people hurting children. That was the whole point. He campaigned on cleaning house. On exposing elite criminals. On protecting kids. And I bought it. Fully.

So when I watched him talk about the Epstein files a couple days ago, with my own eyes and say, “It’s time to move on. We have better things to worry about,” that was the moment everything switched. Move on? Move on from children being trafficked? Move on from powerful people abusing minors? Move on from elites being protected? I can’t move on from that. I won’t.

The more I look into it, the more it feels like the same pattern. Protect the powerful. Coverup the truth, Shift focus. If you campaigned on exposing corruption and then dismiss the biggest corruption scandal involving minors in modern history, what conclusion am I supposed to draw? Either you’re in on it. You’re protecting someone. Or you never meant what you said. And that’s the betrayal. I’m not a Democrat. I’m not a liberal. I aligned more with Republicans because it matched my values more closely. But I’m done pretending there’s some moral high ground in either party. It’s not Republican versus Democrat. It’s not left versus right. It’s not red versus blue. It’s us versus them. They divide us with race baiting, culture wars, endless outrage cycles, while they protect their own, grow their wealth, and tighten control. Meanwhile, regular people fight each other over scraps. And I’m not playing that game anymore.

He didn’t just disappoint critics. He alienated the people who believed in him the most. I know I’m not the only one who saw that moment and felt the shift. So no, I’m not Republican. I’m not Democratic. I’m officially nothing. I’m never voting again. If this is how the system works, I’m not participating in it again. Your Attorney General said if they prosecuted everyone in the files, the system would collapse. Let it collapse, let it burn with all these sick fucks in it.

RIP MAGA.
Blake Humphreys.

[Nick Pope @nickpopemod]

A Message From Nick Pope:

A while ago, following some digestive issues, I was diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Unfortunately, it's Stage 4 and has metastasized to my liver. While I know that it's kindness and hope that leads people to suggest healers and supposed miracle cures, and to say things like "fight it", and "you can beat it", I'm afraid my diagnosis and my situation leaves no doubt whatsoever: I can't beat it.

What an amazing adventure I've had! A 21-year career at the UK Ministry of Defence, where I got involved in subjects ranging from financial policy to counter-terrorism; from military policing to UAP. And I saved six cows; it's a long story! The things I've done; the places I've been; the people I've met; and the secrets I've been privy to. I wouldn't have swapped it for the world. And then a second career, where my previous government UAP role brought me to the attention of the world's media, leading me to become a regular commentator on TV news shows and documentaries, as well as consulting and acting as spokesperson on various UFO and alien-themed movies, TV series and video games. The media called me the real Fox Mulder!

The true highlight, of course, is life with my wonderful, beautiful and incredibly smart wife, Elizabeth. She's a real-life Agent Scully: a scientist, a skeptic and a redhead. We met randomly in the lobby bar of the Fairmont Hotel in downtown San José (she was an anthropology professor at San José State University) in October 2010 and got married 3 months later. We applied successfully for my Green Card and she had me shipped over and imported to the U.S., where a new adventure began, as Elizabeth and I enjoyed wildlife watching at our wonderful home in Tucson, desert hikes, film noir, true crime, country music, Sunday lunches with my in-laws, and much more besides. Recently, we had an amazing one-year adventure in New York City, living 5 minutes from Times Square, and having a wonderful view of the Empire State Building from our apartment window.

We proofread each other's books and articles (I love commas, hyphens and exclamation points way more than Elizabeth, and managed to win at least a few of those battles), and I'm  supporting her in her ongoing fight for free speech, academic freedom, and keeping political correctness, superstition and identity politics out of science and academia. The White House Press Secretary Tweeted one of her recent newspaper articles, which shows the huge impact she's having.

I kept working for as long as I could (right up until last week), with my various film/TV interviews, conference appearances, and live events, including my position as moderator of Ancient Aliens Live - where I think I did 94 shows. Sadly, the time has come where I've had to step away from this work.

A lot of people have followed my work on UAP. I'm loath to use the word "fans", because I'm not a celebrity. But I am a public figure, and many people have followed me on my journey as I've sought to keep the UAP subject in the public eye, and to frame it as a defense, national security and safety of flight issue - as well as a fascinating science problem. Some of this work has been public knowledge, but some such work, of necessity, has been done behind the scenes. I hope I've helped move the needle forward. But most people, of course, know me through my media interviews and live events. To everyone who's followed me on my journey, thank you - and good luck with your own journeys. I wish you every success and happiness.

It's all been amazing, and I'm grateful for the things I've done, not mournful for the things that I won't now get to do.

Per Aspera Ad Astra!

Nick Pope, Tucson, Arizona, February 12, 2026

[lesley2206 @lesley22061]

@PippaCrerar

[GabeTheBabe @Gabe_Trust]

What Actually Happened on the Last Episode of Disclosure Tonight

I want to clearly explain what happened on the most recent episode of Disclosure Tonight, because false accusations were made publicly and repeated without context.

For those who don’t know how the show works:
All guests join a private Google Meet back chat. They cannot see the YouTube livestream while the show is live. Thomas runs the back chat, keeping the conversation moving with the guests and me. As co-host, Mike also moderates the YouTube live chat during the show.

During the live broadcast, Panda entered the YouTube chat and told our audience that Mike Disclosure had repeatedly doxxed his house and his sister months ago. That claim is false.

Here are the facts:

• He posted a photo of a house with no address and no name, and I did not say who it belonged to.
• Panda himself immediately responded publicly and announced that it was his house that he lives in with his sister. That information came from him, not Mike.
• He also shared a photo of Panda and his sister that he himself had posted publicly on Facebook. That is not doxxing.

Because Panda was lying to the live audience and falsely accusing Mike Disclosure of doxxing, He briefly put his actual name and address on screen for approximately two seconds, after which it disappeared permanently.

That action was intentional and very specific:
It was a warning to Panda, not an attempt to expose him. The message was simple—stop lying. If Mike had actually intended to dox him, Mike could have done so permanently and publicly. I did not.

Immediately after the show, the episode was set to Private, so the public could not rewatch it.

No one watching the livestream noticed or recorded what appeared on screen.
None of the guests — Teejay, Rev. Darren, or Gabe — saw it happen live. They only learned about it after Panda posted about it himself.

Panda took a screenshot, redacted his own information, and posted it on his X account.
That is where people saw it.
Not on the show.
Not from the audience.
Not from us.

Even then, with everything redacted, he still was not doxxed.

So to be perfectly clear:
No one but Panda saw his information. No one but Panda put anything online.

Despite this, Panda has been playing the victim, and a number of people rushed to condemn the show without knowing the facts—people who didn’t bother to ask, verify, or think critically.

What’s especially telling is this:
Many of the same people now demanding that Thomas and Mike apologize and “beg for Panda’s forgiveness” were completely silent when Gabe was actually attacked and doxxed by trolls. No apologies. No outrage. No calls for accountability.

Yet we’re expected to apologize for something Panda himself manufactured and amplified?
That will never happen.

Panda and Tupa started this conflict years ago — targeting anyone that likes Lue Elizondo and their friends repeatedly. They did not start this war, but we will not pretend it didn’t happen or accept false narratives to appease bad actors.

Truth matters. Context matters.
And we’re done letting people rewrite reality

[Mike Disclosure @MikeDisclosure]

🚨 Shocking Truth: How a Handful of X Personas Are Committing Wire Fraud and RICO-Level Crimes in Plain Sight🚨

Key Players and Their Alleged Crimes in the $ROGERS, $RPK, and PsyopAnime Meme Coin Schemes.
The central figures in this coordinated network include:

@UlrichNeujahr (DMerDaddy / DoomerZaddy): Positions himself as the "Original Father of DOOM," focusing on catastrophism and dark alien agendas. Links his social persona directly to wallets involved in $ROGERS trades.

@RedPandaKoala: Runs a UFO-themed account (bio includes "#grifter") that promotes $RPK token and related hype, frequently interacting with the group to amplify narratives.

@tupacabra: Presents as a UFO researcher (joined 2021), but heavily cross-interacts with the above via retweets, replies, and shared conspiratorial content.

@FreshCalls2025 and allied sockpuppet accounts: Newer or pseudo-community profiles that blatantly shill tokens (e.g., embedding $RPK contract addresses) while fabricating engagement.

Crimes They Are Committing:

These individuals appear to operate a tightly knit influence network that engages in market manipulation and securities fraud.
Tactics include:
Creating artificial hype through self-amplification (cross-retweets, identical slogans like "2026 is the new 2016," shared emojis/keywords, and echo chambers of conspiracy/UFO themes).

Using sockpuppet accounts to fake organic interest (e.g., repeatedly asking for non-existent links in threads to sustain buzz and mimic virality).

Coordinating on-chain activity with social pushes: Whale wallets (often linked to these personas) time large buys/sells to pump prices during hype peaks—turning tiny investments into six-figure gains—before dumping on retail buyers.

This constitutes pump-and-dump schemes, where prices are artificially inflated via misleading promotions and insider coordination, then crashed for profit.

Under U.S. laws (e.g., Securities Exchange Act), this qualifies as market manipulation and fraud, potentially involving unregistered securities, wire fraud (via interstate communications), and RICO elements as an ongoing criminal enterprise. Victims are everyday investors drawn in by FOMO and conspiratorial storytelling, often losing significant funds in worthless tokens. The perpetrators exploit anonymity, lack of disclosure, and human vulnerabilities like curiosity about UFOs/doomsday themes for personal gain.

Stay vigilant—do thorough research, avoid hype-driven meme coins, and report suspicious activity. UfoTwitter's future depends on exposing their operations. These people will not get away with this, we will continue to shine a light on them and their illegal operations against the public.

Share your thoughts about this in the reply section, and repost this so people can be aware of what they have been doing. Follow this account for updates to this story.
#ufotwitter #ufox #uapx

[Noel Smith @NoelSmith]

Explaining options to people for the first time:

[b00ts @knightseeee]

@MiddleOfMayhem bagginsees

[b00ts @knightseeee]

@528vibes Spooky mellon

[joeyisnotmyname @JoeyIsntMyName]

A couple months ago, I recorded a conversation with former Marine, Tim Short, who was in Michael Herrera's platoon, and was in Indonesia in 2009. He was not on the mission Herrera talks about, (In fact, Tim doubts Herrera's account of that mission), but he has valuable first-hand experience with the Indonesia operation as a whole, and I felt it important to capture his testimony.
I've been incredibly busy with work and family, and haven't had time to edit this properly, so at this point I'm just putting it out there. I edited about half of it, then pretty much let the rest of the conversation ride. I just felt it was unfair to Tim to have this in limbo for so long.
This is not something I typically do, and I don't have an interest in continuing to do videos like this, but I felt I had a good perspective on important questions to ask.
We also recorded a part two, which I'll upload soon.

[Nick Madrid @NickMadrid16]

@MvonRen @ageofdisclosure Rubio’s walking back his Age of Disclosure remarks, distancing from others’ claims—likely at the president’s direction. Odds are the White House won’t address UAP programs publicly anytime soon, if ever.

Disappointed yet predictable.

[b00ts @knightseeee]

@VettedPodcast Bait those clicks