Krs

Former owner of krsblox (797K+ subscribers)

[Krs @krsreal]

It's now been 80 days...

80 days and krsblox still hasn't received a proper human review. Despite two related channels, under the same Gmail, being reinstated under the same enforcement.

@TeamYouTube could you please look into this? I've also sent additional information to your DMs.

[Krs @krsreal]

It's now been 80 days...

80 days and krsblox still hasn't received a proper human review. Despite two related channels, under the same Gmail, being reinstated under the same enforcement.

@TeamYouTube could you please look into this? I've also sent additional information to your DMs.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi @TeamYouTube, it has now been 70 days.

Between Dec 15–18, 2025, 4 of my channels under the same Gmail account were terminated in the same enforcement wave. It is now Feb 23, 2026. After multiple appeals and ongoing communication with YouTube and Google Support, two of those channels were manually reviewed and fully reinstated under the same termination reason.

However, krsblox (https://t.co/HFovx1rCU0) has not received a manual review since Jan 10 and is auto denied within seconds. Even after waiting 3–5 weeks between appeals, it does not reach a human reviewer.

krsblox uploaded original content, recorded and edited by me, and grew organically to nearly 800,000 subscribers without breaching policies. It was not created after enforcement, was not used to bypass any suspension, and I did not create or operate any channel to evade YouTube’s policies. There was no attempt to circumvent enforcement in any way.

With two channels reinstated under the same action, this inconsistency clearly requires escalation. I am asking for a proper human review and a fair evaluation.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi @TeamYouTube, it has now been 70 days.

Between Dec 15–18, 2025, 4 of my channels under the same Gmail account were terminated in the same enforcement wave. It is now Feb 23, 2026. After multiple appeals and ongoing communication with YouTube and Google Support, two of those channels were manually reviewed and fully reinstated under the same termination reason.

However, krsblox (https://t.co/HFovx1rCU0) has not received a manual review since Jan 10 and is auto denied within seconds. Even after waiting 3–5 weeks between appeals, it does not reach a human reviewer.

krsblox uploaded original content, recorded and edited by me, and grew organically to nearly 800,000 subscribers without breaching policies. It was not created after enforcement, was not used to bypass any suspension, and I did not create or operate any channel to evade YouTube’s policies. There was no attempt to circumvent enforcement in any way.

With two channels reinstated under the same action, this inconsistency clearly requires escalation. I am asking for a proper human review and a fair evaluation.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi again @TeamYouTube.

One of my channels (krsfootball) was reinstated today after a successful appeal, confirming the termination was incorrect. However, other channels I own that were removed at the same time as part of the same enforcement action, including krsblox (nearly 800,000 subscribers), remain terminated.

These channels that are owned and operated by me, were affected simultaneously, and appeals are now instantly auto-denied, preventing any further manual review. I'm hoping this situation can be reviewed for consistency following the reinstatement, thanks.

[Shaz @shazyoutube]

Seeing tons of creators lose their channels lately, but love to see @YouTube’s been relentless in reinstating creators fast. ❤️

We’re putting together a community-sourced tracker to help YouTube review & restore even faster.

Retweet to spread the word!

https://t.co/4ne4Grep0B

[Krs @krsreal]

@shazyoutube @YouTube @iamdavenick @Animeako126 @OldMoneyLuxury @OlekChaseCar @mister_manners_ @anotherdive @Fascinatorfacts @FefeDemeny @bjr2730 @adamatik_0 @lakkyninja @OptSZN @Inshow_Off @enricovincente @rjswiftofficial @xtunis1a @LilSoftieGacha @historicoenperu @D_YellowMadness @rospinam @realhjubi @ItzFe4rLessyt @bbgstreams1 @XavierR0BLX @TypicalFemboy69 @sirsaltine7 @CulpritChronic @allin1adukkala @Pbkbiswajitbhai @howaboutstar @niokanal @miisa_princess @LoraMa393996 @LogoFan2010 @gamer77711804 @MunnaVdoo @Thebibleseen @nyasahi @NotVidev @ReaperReaver1 @Real_dextro @NetSpill @GlitchDotCraft @ItsGopex @abdouYT148 @AsterixLiangOff @frivsasasa @ConstructopiaES Thank you. Absolute legend!

[Shaz @shazyoutube]

@LoraMa393996 @LogoFan2010 @gamer77711804 @MunnaVdoo @Thebibleseen @krsreal @Nyasahi @NotVidev @ReaperReaver1 @Real_dextro @NetSpill @glitchdotcraft @ItsGopex @abdouYT148 @AsterixLiangOff @frivsasasa @ConstructopiaES

Biggest addition yet! DM if you need changes and #RetweetTheSheet ❤️

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi @TeamYouTube, I'm posting again because I'm genuinely stuck and don't know what else to do.

I’ve been a YouTube creator for years. On the 15th December my small channel Frogblox was terminated under the Spam and Deceptive Practices policy. That decision then led to my main channel krsblox, which had nearly 800,000 subscribers, and other channels being terminated for circumvention. There were no independent violations on those channels.

What’s been the hardest is that I still don’t understand what Frogblox itself did wrong. The channel had very limited original content. The appeal responses and replies I received also came extremely quickly. This left me unsure whether the channel was ever properly reviewed in full by a human.

Adding to the confusion, one of my older channels, krsfut, with 133,000 subscribers, remains active. This is despite being told I shouldn’t be able to access or use other channels. That inconsistency makes me worry this may be a false root decision rather than intentional wrongdoing.

I’m not trying to argue policy or demand special treatment. I’m simply asking for a careful manual review of Frogblox. Everything else, including the loss of my main channel, hinges entirely on that one decision.

If a human review confirms the termination, I’ll accept that. I just need to know it was genuinely looked at.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hello @TeamYouTube, I'm making one last request for a proper human review of my channel Frogblox.

My channel was terminated under the Spam and Deceptive Practices policy which I genuinely don't understand based on the content that was uploaded.

The channel had 15 original Roblox related Shorts, uploaded at a normal, non automated pace (generally 1 per day). There was no automation, no reused clips, no external links, and nothing misleading. I've read the policy in detail multiple times and still can't see how the channel fits that violation.

I'm concerned because the reply and DM I received from you both came within minutes, which doesn't feel like enough time for all the content on the channel to be properly reviewed. As a creator who has spent years learning and working on this platform, I'd really appreciate reassurance that Frogblox and my case overall have been carefully looked at by a real person.

Channel URL : https://t.co/h4x3oZgWl3

Thank you

[Krs @krsreal]

Following up once more @TeamYouTube. I'm requesting a manual review of the Frogblox termination under the Spam and Deceptive Practices policy, as it appears to be applied in error and triggered circumvention removals on my other channels. Including my main channel krsblox (797K+ subs).

I've reviewed the policy carefully and believe this deserves a human review. I'd really appreciate your help.

Frogblox URL: https://t.co/h4x3oZgWl3

krsblox URL: https://t.co/HFovx1rCU0

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi @TeamYouTube,

I'm requesting a manual human review of my channel Frogblox, which was terminated for the 'spam, deceptive practices and scams policy'.

Frogblox details :
- 15 total uploads
- 1 original upload per day
- No reused clips, no automation and no mass posting.

Frogblox URL : https://t.co/h4x3oZgWl3

Following this enforcement, additional channels under my ownership were removed under the 'circumvention policy'. Including my main channel krsblox (797K+ subscribers).

krsblox URL : https://t.co/HFovx1rCU0

An older channel (krsfut, 133K subscribers) remains active, which indicates this may not be a broader pattern of abuse.

As the circumvention removals only happened after Frogblox was terminated, I'm asking for a manual review of the original spam decision.

Thank you.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hi @TeamYouTube,

I'm requesting a manual human review of my channel Frogblox, which was terminated for the 'spam, deceptive practices and scams policy'.

Frogblox details :
- 15 total uploads
- 1 original upload per day
- No reused clips, no automation and no mass posting.

Frogblox URL : https://t.co/h4x3oZgWl3

Following this enforcement, additional channels under my ownership were removed under the 'circumvention policy'. Including my main channel krsblox (797K+ subscribers).

krsblox URL : https://t.co/HFovx1rCU0

An older channel (krsfut, 133K subscribers) remains active, which indicates this may not be a broader pattern of abuse.

As the circumvention removals only happened after Frogblox was terminated, I'm asking for a manual review of the original spam decision.

Thank you.

[Krs @krsreal]

Hello @TeamYouTube, my main channel krsblox (almost 800,000 subscribers) was recently banned for circumvention. My appeal has been pending for just over 52 hours now. Just hoping to confirm it's receiving full review.

Channel URL : https://t.co/iO5le69EEo