@SCOTUSblog Seems that many did not actually read about the case and only relied on the misleading headline. The issue in this case was METHOD of executing the death penalty, not whether the inmate will or will not be executed.
https://t.co/GOP0xBTuPb
@dylan_smity @SCOTUSblog Looks like you relied on the misleading headline. The issue in this case was METHOD of executing the death penalty, not whether the inmate will or will not be executed.
https://t.co/GOP0xBTuPb
@BrooklynB324@HeidiLiFeldman Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53 outlines the process of appointing special masters. Basically it is the court that has jurisdiction over the case. Here, FL, federal court.
@tribelaw Both Ginsburg and Breyer were against "packing the court." I understand the knee-jerk reaction but it was widely condemned by all sides when FDR attempted it.
This lecture on International law looks interesting: Brookings Institution hosts a panel discussion, hosting international experts regarding "Crimes against humanity, genocide and Ecocide, etc.
https://t.co/cewCeCV3X2