Not adopting Montaigne’s terminology. But I have always preferred to socialise with non- academics. They are more fun, and often more interested in/ interesting re all sorts of topics as Montaigne suggested. I have had better chats re Byzantium with autodidacts than many students
'I owe my soul to Shakespeare, to Spenser and to Blake, perhaps to William Morris, and to the English language in which I think, speak, and write, . . . everything I love has come to me through English.'
W. B. Yeats
"No elegy for the Western Canon could be complete without an appreciation of the canonical critic proper, Dr. Samuel Johnson, unmatched by any critic in any nation before or after him."
Harold Bloom
McCarthy, like Faulkner before him, tackled subjects on a historical, geological, even cosmic scale, something that his housebound imitators, or his reflexive critics, just can't seem to do.