@SimonZev It’s the obvious (and only solution), but nobody talks about it for fear of challenging the tick-box mentality we have to accessibly in this country (at least in active travel/the public realm)
@zacspiro The problem with being employed as a rubber stamper is that it gets boring so you sometimes have to reject things to keep work interesting and to have something to talk about with your mates in the pub
@CraigForward@LCRMayor I’ve always thought it would make some sense to divert the west coast main line under Speke to the airport before joining back at Hale Bank - that way you don’t need to change any service patterns and you get 3tph with Avant, LNWR and TFW
@rosemeyer1939 There is a certain mentality among some consultants that if something is within the ‘scheme extent’, then it needs to be changed. There is another mentality that falsely assumes that any change is automatically an improvement. This looks like an unfortunate mix of both…
@shortthought@createstreets Is that the whole story? You rarely see junctions with underpass lanes in cities, and roads usually go over railways rather than under (unless the track is built on an embankment). Same with bridges instead of underpasses at stations… maybe we just are incapable of digging?
@DuncanStott The classic British approach of planning/designing a good scheme, dithering due to scheme costing more than not building the scheme (surprise), redesigning the scheme to be cheaper (worse), and wondering why said redesigned scheme (if its built) isn’t working as well as hoped…
@euanmills As somebody with a grandparent with dementia living in a ground floor flat, I very much disagree. This essentially cuts you off from any interaction with your neighbours - which happens in the lobby/main entrance. That informal support network is invaluable
@H_H_Gray @climbtechy They also suggest a 0.5m buffer is needed on a 2m cycle track - not true if using a stepped track, or alternatively for a short stretch a 1.5m cycle track with 0.5m buffer could suffice. Thats 2.4m in total. It’s really quite lazy counting and I’m surprised it wasn’t flagged up
@H_H_Gray @climbtechy They’re also assuming that 3.25m is the minimum for general traffic lanes. For bus lanes I would almost accept it (though plenty of cities on the continent use 3m bus lanes just fine). But general traffic lanes can absolutely be as low as 2.8m - that’s up to 1.4m of extra space.
@ArmitageAndi@rosemeyer1939 Having said that (and I haven’t looked at it in detail yet) do think any scheme that doesn’t include some element of filtering is going to fall short of what is possible there
@ArmitageAndi@rosemeyer1939 Same kind of principles, I think ultimately it’s a street where it’ll always be busy and chaotic so any scheme has to recognise and accept that rather than trying to ‘control’ behaviour