@udaysy@fchollet Even neural networks can be inspected, modified and understood up to a certain size. The problem is the scale of the software/networks that makes them blackboxes: when the effort of inspecting them becomes sufficiently large, you're likely going to treat them as a black boxes
@trobuling@fchollet Depending on your position in the company, I think it may be your job to inform your employer (or anyone above you) about potential wrong hardware/infrastructure choices
@EdSealing@DamienTeney@ziv_ravid Well, not necessarily, they might be very different paths. Humans have their own biases because of the evolutionary path that led us here. Going from 0 to human, and then from human to optimal might be more expensive than 0 to optimal (e.g. alphazero vs alphago)
@DamienTeney@EdSealing@ziv_ravid Also, imo, sticking too much to recreating human-like AI will basically have little value. If you could replicate with 100% accuracy a human brain, it would have the same limitations as humans, which by definition will not enable any super-human behavior
@NeuralRunner The special issue is open to both methodological contributions and to applications to any area where interpretability could be a great added value
Working on Interpretable Reinforcement Learning? Submit your work to our Special Issue on Applied Soft Computing!
Submission: Dec 31, 2025
Final Decision: June 1, 2026
Details & submission: https://t.co/H4yJ7XoVvU
#reinforcementlearning#interpretability#xai
@seth_quant Yes, and in many cases they can match the performance of non-interpretable methods! Looking forward to submissions that close the gap in many other areas where Interpretable RL is still behind non-interpretable methods!
🎉 Our work "SMOSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks" has been accepted by AAAI 2025! #AAAI2025
paper: https://t.co/6nBahjMLmn
with @L_Ferrarotti, @brulepri, @gih82
🧵1/6
@jsuarez If you look at the search space, in the discrete case you have to pick a value from N possibilities (N is the number of actions), while in the continuous case you have to choose N values from R^N or [-1, 1]^N in practice, which makes the search much larger and harder to optimize
@adellacioppa@gih82@CunegattiElia In "An investigation on the use of Large Language Models for hyperparameter tuning in Evolutionary Algorithms" (w/ @ayaman00, @facaraff , @gih82 ), we investigate the capabilities of LLMs in tuning hyperparameters in evolution strategies.
4/5