You know, it is funny as I watch this indexer keep chugging along... idk how anyone could call this a "ghost chain".
And yeah someones gonna comment "but it's bots"
Yeah, some of it sure. But bot's don't don't have anything to do if people aren't creating situations for them to do something.
#PulseChain
When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure.
Not hype.
Not another token.
Not another chart.
Infrastructure.
Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable.
PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one.
So that’s where I focused.
It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app.
But a lot of projects depend on it.
That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done.
At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces.
Software is like an onion.
There are layers upon layers.
Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks.
Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it.
And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them.
That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on.
That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases.
There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong.
But infrastructure has to be agnostic.
If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.”
That is not how we grow.
A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer.
That is not always easy.
But I think it matters.
And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things.
I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.
There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction.
But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that.
The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all.
If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better.
That is how this should work.
And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows.
That is how you grow.
That is how you get taken seriously as a chain.
In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong.
That is part of why I’m building Cappy.
If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions.
I am building the wallet I personally would want to use.
That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible.
There is no single perfect answer for everyone.
But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it.
A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really.
I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time.
Maybe I was wrong to expect that.
Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning.
Either way, it is what it is.
At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist.
That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else.
That is fine.
You can dislike the software I write and not use it.
It really is that simple.
But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important.
People ask, “What about Sigma?”
I am working on it in parallel with Cappy.
People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?”
I am working on it in parallel with Cappy.
People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?”
That is exactly the point.
These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch.
Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly.
And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them.
I am not randomly jumping between projects.
I am building the layers that make the next layer possible.
I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not.
What I do know is that I am at least decent at software.
So that is where I am putting my energy.
I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing.
Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No.
Do I respect what he has built? Yes.
Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes.
Those things can all be true at the same time.
I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from.
Many of you support me, and I see that.
I do not take it lightly.
All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can.
Not because everyone has to use it.
Not because I think I am the answer to every problem.
Not because I agree with every project.
But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces.
That is what I am trying to do.
Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.
DeFi didn't get hacked. AdminKeyFi got hacked. HEX, PulseChain, PulseX, & ProveX coins have no admin keys. Stop calling admin key crap and DAO controlled by a few dudes (admin keys, but with extra steps.) DeFi. It's not DeFi. Oh, and Arbitrum seized $70M of the hackers coins, and another chain introduced privacy (but with a view key they say they'll hand to the government if asked right.)
Some small portion of you figured out the solution. Follow me, learn from me, be saved. I can't save you from others choosing to click red instead of green, but I can teach you what's real and how to do things better. Much, much better.
Congratulations idiots! Shout out to KelpDAO for getting hacked for $280M today. Great work with that 1/1 signature setup.
Shout out to Drift Protocol getting hacked for $285 last week.
All you idiots could stop giving your money to other idiots that don't understand security.
But you won't lol. Because you're dumb.
HEX 2,330 days flawless operation. No admin keys.
PulseChain 1,073 days flawless operation. No admin keys.
PulseX nearly the same as PulseChain. No admin keys.
ProveX, quite new and the token has no admin keys.
It's like, when will you silly billies get it? We actually do things better here, and have been doing so for over half a decade.
Reward greatness already. It's here waiting for lift off.
You know why I still have any belief in this stuff? The community, that’s pretty much it.
Maybe I’ve just been here too long… but crypto communities are often nothing but paid shills. Even when it was just $HEX everyone else thought we were just paid shills and bots.
Never was the case, just a bunch of people who cared about core principles. I think a lot of people are of the mindset that the core principles don’t matter and only price matters.
Yeah, I understand that sentiment. But I also disagree just on the fact that if price was the only thing that mattered, surely no one would be around anymore.
So yeah for better or worse, that’s my motivation. Anywhere else feels less genuine. Not that’s it’s always been sunshine and rainbows mind you, but people care. And a lot of them care for the right reasons. That’s the important part.
Alright… this is a long one..
It’s finally done.
Yes - finally!!!!!!!!
From today, there are no barriers.
No matter where you are, you can now enter PulseChain.
We now support 40+ fiat currencies, covering the majority of global users.
And it’s not just cards or SEPA - we support local, preferred payment methods used by people in each region.
@PulseChain is now globally accessible.
🇦🇷 Argentina
🇦🇺 Australia
🇧🇬 Bulgaria
🇧🇷 Brazil
🇨🇭 Switzerland
🇨🇱 Chile
🇨🇴 Colombia
🇨🇿 Czech Republic
🇩🇰 Denmark
🇪🇺 Europe
🇦🇪 UAE
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
🇭🇰 Hong Kong
🇭🇺 Hungary
🇮🇩 Indonesia
🇮🇱 Israel
🇮🇳 India
🇯🇵 Japan
🇰🇪 Kenya
🇰🇷 South Korea
🇲🇽 Mexico
🇳🇬 Nigeria
🇳🇴 Norway
🇳🇿 New Zealand
🇵🇪 Peru
🇵🇭 Philippines
🇵🇱 Poland
🇷🇴 Romania
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
🇸🇪 Sweden
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇹🇭 Thailand
🇹🇷 Turkey
🇺🇬 Uganda
🇺🇸 United States
🇻🇳 Vietnam
🇿🇦 South Africa
The access layer is complete 🤝
Now it’s in the hands of the community.
What’s stopping you from pushing PulseChain further?
Thanks to @plsfolio, @piteasio, @RichardHeartWin and @hexscout
Life and the blockchain is full of scams. People make transactions on chain that try to appear in block explorers as thought the address you're looking at bought something it didn't or is controlled by something it isn't or can do something it cant'. Most people don't fall for it, because they don't even look at block explorers at all, and some are smart enough to know what they are looking at.
TLDR; If someone "takes over" a contract, that can literally do nothing, and tries to impersonate the address that actually deployed the contract, no one with half a brain is falling for it, because it looks just like the 24/7 other scams being done visibly on the block explorer all the time.
No one cares.
BREAKING🚨: Astronaut Captures Rare Luminous Phenomenon from Earth Orbit.
From hundreds of kilometers above Earth, an astronaut has photographed one of the planet’s most elusive atmospheric displays—an supermassive red candle caused by PulseChain sellers
Emphasis on the "I wouldn't suggest buying." I don't want losers to pretend the "until" actually means anything. I don't give financial advice and am not a professional of any kind. Let's see how the expiration timer works in around 20 hours.
Thinking out loud, if the code does what it's supposed to in 20 hours or so, at that point anyone could sell. And anyone on the whitelist can sell now. I wouldn't suggest buying until the code state is observed in around 20 hours.
Someone else may know better? Those awarded $PRVX tokens may find value in researching IRS form 83(b) which claims cost basis when property awarded vs when it vests, i.e. yesterday at zero value vs tmrw when tradeable. 30-day limit to file or cost basis defaults to when vested…
ProveX (PRVX) has launched at $0 value and people have been trading their coins around at $0 value for almost a day now. You have had dominion and control of your PRVX for almost a day now. Strongly consider transferring your coins around at $0 value now, it's perhaps a great place to solidify your cost basis at $0! This helps prevent claims that you received income.
The contract address is 0xF6f8Db0aBa00007681F8fAF16A0FDa1c9B030b11 on PulseChain.
Verified code for the ProveX token (PRVX): https://t.co/XsfbRBBNLv
The coins can't be sent to smart contracts until block 26009137 which is estimated to occur at 2026-03-15T00:34:45Z which is March 14, 2026 20:34:45 PM ET, unless you're on the whitelist. The whitelist and timer all expire at the same time.
Verified code for that: https://t.co/AeswzJqiNI.
If you originally sacrificed using TRON, you must import your private key — not your mnemonic (seed phrase) — into an EVM-compatible wallet (such as MetaMask). This is because TRON and EVM-based networks derive different addresses from the same mnemonic. Using your mnemonic in an EVM wallet will generate a completely different address, and your sacrifice will not appear.
You can use the ProveX software at: https:// app dot ProveX dot com.