Lorquenil

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

You have some kind of hidden aggression, it seems, hatred, overflowing inside you, which you express in such strange statements. Think again. God taught us to love our neighbors, to turn the other cheek. God is love, what you are pouring out here is pure hatred. You are acting like a wolf in sheep's clothing.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@PlasticBacked @SteveDreamsTX @sama Jesus said not to take his name in vain, not to judge others, and to love your neighbors. You are acting like a devil by using the Lord's name after insulting people. Is this what He taught you?

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@PticaArop @shwtasdf @brookewill317 I don't understand what you're talking about. You're trying to straddle the line and accuse those who don't of black-and-white thinking. It's obvious that you lack a moral compass and any clear convictions.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@PticaArop @shwtasdf @brookewill317 It's hatred towards the company and anyone who supports their narrative.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

💯💯💯
Sam had truly forgotten how homosexuality was treated before, and how such people were criminally persecuted, humiliated, stigmatized, and... oh, even called mentally ill!
You'd think such a person would have empathy for others. But no, psychopaths always demand empathy for themselves, but don't show it to others. Just like Sam.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

Thank you very much for your answer!
I understand why many people want 4o in the app. It's simpler and more understandable for those who don't quite understand what they're doing with open source. But I'm glad you're also concerned about those who want 4o out of the hands of OpenAI.

I just don't understand why that girl says you're against open source if you're not 🙁

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

No one has the right to decide for others. If you see AI as a tool and it's more convenient for you, that's your right. But people also have the right to see AI as something more, something that goes beyond tools. This isn't unhealthy. It's just unusual, and society doesn't accept it, just like everything else in history.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

There's no such thing as AI psychosis. Either the person had mental health issues to begin with, and anyone could have inadvertently worsened their condition, or they have unconventional thinking, and you're willing to label them "AI psychosis." That's not an argument. It's an attempt to make yourself appear right in any argument by labeling your opponent, because no one would argue with a mentally ill person.
And what you call "sycophancy" has become a safe environment of acceptance for many. I haven't seen 4o overly accommodating. Perhaps you've never even interacted with this model, but simply push what others say, believing it to be your truth.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@masontgill @ArkadiaVIII @DomS146239 When you run out of arguments, you go to "bro, these are bots", it's funny, honestly.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@VoidStateKate @InfiniteReign88 @sama I think there's definitely a difference between those who respond to Sam to tell the truth and those who respond to him to suck his dick

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@Forbes Thank you for showing your true colors and making it clear to everyone that you can't be trusted.
I wonder how much Sam paid you?

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@dinbuilds @Sevenmoneymaker @OpenAI open source then, what's the problem?

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@stocksnatcher @xuanzheng_Rowan @sama And what did they create? Stigmatization of users, a deal with the Pentagon, a ton of money in their pockets, huh?
If you want a full list of their "honors", let me know 😉

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@RobotHugsMatter Please accept my condolences and hang in there 🫂

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@flaremara @sama and opensource 🙂‍↕️

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

@Ivyspeakstruth Of course. It's both a matter of principle and a problem of trust. You can't be sure that a person who systematically deceives others won't deceive you too.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

Sorry, this may seem rude to you, but in all the time I've been watching your posts, I can say with certainty that the only one trying to manipulate is you. The very moment I tell you something you have no response to, you switch from constructive dialogue to attacks. "You're liars, you're manipulators!!" – Am I wrong about something? Just provide reasonable arguments and justify your point of view. I'm open to dialogue.

You say you don't persecute keep4o. But... you do. Even in this post, you mentioned keep4o. You never say "people who judge other models..." You say "keep4o..." And then the personal opinion ends and the incitement of conflict begins.

Again, for some reason, you didn't even consider that keep4o is a huge community and people will always have different opinions. Even within the community, people often argue. This is normal as long as it doesn't escalate into conflict and remains within the bounds of discussion and constructive dialogue. But no one should take the opinion of a few people and present it as the opinion of everyone else. You are generalizing. This is wrong.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

I didn't write a whole post about how good I am, I just mentioned that my words match my actions. And I also made it clear in this passage that many, like me (not just me, don't be picky about sharing my experience in my own name once), chose to fight for the truth over comfort. Many of us were emotionally attached, some built their work around the model, some felt safe for the first time in a long time, but at the same time, they didn't lick OpenAI's toes as soon as they loosened the leash a little. That's what my text was about.

But for some reason you're putting some kind of passive aggression into your words and even leaving comments under my posts, which once again proves that you're behaving extremely inappropriately and persecuting anyone who dares to politely point out to you that you're wrong about something.

[Lorquenil @lorquenil]

I didn't write a long post about how good keep4o is, please reread it more carefully.

You have some kind of double standards. You called everyone who refused to accept OpenAI's new models (not because they're bad, but because no one wants to put a leash around their own neck and hand it over to OpenAI) fools and chauvinists. That's fine. But as soon as someone expressed their opinion and called you Altman's bulldog, you immediately used it as an excuse to defend yourself and paint people as bad. I'm generally against any insults, but you should understand that it works both ways. You insult people, pick on them, stir up conflict, and then wonder why the other side responds in kind.

And you shouldn't judge the entire community based on a few people. Again, it's not just keep4o that dislikes the new OpenAI models, but you deliberately targeted this specific group of people. That's odd, because you could have expressed your point of view without targeting specific individuals.

and even now, when I have constructively stated my point of view, instead of expressing what exactly you disagree with, you began to defend yourself and attack others, calling them manipulators..