Luis

[Luis @ltrias97]

@Albiol_XG Exacto. Si un inquilino acredita vulnerabilidad, se pacta una renta bonificada temporalmente (-50% por ejemplo) y que el Estado/CCAA pague la diferencia y/o bonifique fiscalmente. La única forma de no cargarse el mercado de alquiler junto con más construcción y VPO.

[Kiko Llaneras @kikollan]

El eclipse minuto a minuto sobre principales ciudades: hora, solape, total, sombra… y esperad a la entrada de la noche 👇

[Reilly Chase @rchase]

I still think about this a lot

[me @twetsfyp]

Mito Claude is back in an insane way

This is a 16-minute tutorial on how to create $50,000 cinematic websites (step by step) with Claude Fable 5

[Luis @ltrias97]

@AsensioDavid Los países que votaron muy bajo a Bulgaria (Ucrania, Austria, Chequia..) lo volvieron a hacer en la final.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Accurate

[Luis @ltrias97]

@Gust_2319 If you take the 2022 vote recall from this poll and apply it to these elections, it points to a Tisza win: 46.5% vs 45.5%. Among 2022 abstainers and new voters, Tisza attracts over 80%, so turnout will be decisive. With +300,000 voters, Tisza leads 48% to 43%.

[Luis @ltrias97]

@sighaboutlife @Gust_2319 Not publicly available though...

[Luis @ltrias97]

@lluiv_ @gxldeDespotovic Aliança is not there yet.

[Luis @ltrias97]

@miksama_ Con los trasvases de votos, a mi me sale un Junts en el 15% y Aliança un poco por debajo del 13%. ERC aguanta con el 16% y PSC sigue fuerte rozando el 27%. PP y VOX entre el 9-10%, Comuns rozando el 6% y la CUP 5%. Izquierdas: 54% (+1pp) - Derechas: 46% (+1pp).

[Efemèrides d'Arquitectura @efemarq]

Fa uns dies al New York Times van publicar un article titulat "Barcelona Is Made of Math". El text és mediocre i no val la pena però inclou 4 vídeos amb drons (sense so) molt ben fets, obra d'un tal Edu Bayer.

1/ Pujant Sagrada Família amunt, Façana de la Passió al màxim detall

[Albert Cerrillo Lladó @aalbeert]

𝐄𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚 𝐢 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐢ó 𝐝𝐞 𝐥𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐭 𝐝’𝐡𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐁𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐚

S’estima que a Barcelona hi ha un parc de gairebé 786.000 habitatges.

El parc d’habitatges principals de la ciutat es situaria en les 754.326 unitats, tenint en compte que un 4% dels habitatges totals no serien utilitzats com a residència habitual (altres usos, usos turístics, buits, etc.).

Pel que fa a l’estructura i la concentració de la propietat, es tracta d’un parc força atomitzat, corresponent a un total de quasi 521.000 propietaris, amb una mitjana d’1,5 habitatges per titular.

El 56% dels habitatges estan en mans de propietaris que només tenen un habitatge. El 69,4% dels habitatges són de propietaris que en tenen 1 o 2 i, per tant, el 30,6% d’habitatges restants pertanyen a propietaris que en tenen més de 3.

Si s’analitzen les dades segons el tipus de propietari, predominen de forma majoritària les persones físiques (més de 505.000 propietaris que signifiquen el 97,0% del total i disposen del 84,9% del parc).

El nombre mitjà d’habitatges per propietari és molt diferent segons les tipologies: les persones físiques compten amb una mitjana de 1,3 habitatges, mentre que la mitjana de les persones jurídiques és de 7,7.

Les persones jurídiques que són administracions públiques compten amb 12.893 habitatges a la ciutat, la qual cosa representa l’1,7% del total d’habitatges principals de Barcelona.

A una escala d’anàlisi més detallada, resulten predominants els propietaris que posseeixen un únic habitatge (més de 440.000 titulars que representen un 84,6% del total).

La distribució territorial dels habitatges segons tipus de propietaris no és homogènia a la ciutat de Barcelona. Les administracions públiques tenen un pes major en els barris més perifèrics i en gran part del districte de Ciutat Vella i arriben a representar més del 20% del total d’habitatges dels barris de Can Peguera, Torre Baró, Vallbona i Baró de Viver.

Font: Observatori Metropolità de l’Habitatge de Barcelona (O-HB) amb el suport i la col·laboració de l’Ajuntament de Barcelona i l’Institut Català del Sòl (INCASÒL) (2021). Dades de la Direcció General del Cadastre.

[Luis @ltrias97]

@8tvcat Tiene razón. La única opción que le queda a Junts es mostrarse como alternativa clara a la pinza PSC-ERC en unas Generales donde no se presentará Aliança. Así aspiraría a retener electorado y a crispar la relación con un Gobierno del PP-VOX, que es como más cómodos se sienten.

[Robert Greene @RobertGreene]

Pay attention to your laziness.

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

A 70+ year-old looks like he’s in his 30s after 34 years of daily workouts.

[Luis @ltrias97]

@Guillerjjj @gominuke En invierno tenemos el UTC+1 y en verano el UTC+2. Todos los “expertos” recomiendan el +1, por lo que ten claro que nos quedaremos con ese.
El UTC+0 es el que en principio le correspondería a España pero en Cataluña hoy oscurecería a las 17h en vez de a las 19h… 😱

[Luis @ltrias97]

@inconformista86 @tyleraloevera Para nada. Una cosa es querer regular la entrada de inmigrantes y expulsar a quienes delinquen, y otra muy distinta es ir a provocar conflictos con personas que malviven entre nosotros y tratan de ganarse la vida como pueden, alentando el racismo entre la sociedad. Hay límites.

[Bryan Johnson @bryan_johnson]

People are confused by me and my intentions. I’m called a narcissist, a tech bro, vampire, grifter, and health freak.

Let me be clear about what I’m doing: my goal is to build the world’s next major moral framework. An ideology that bridges human and machine, biology and intelligence, the ancient and the emergent.

The coming psychosis
A real possibility in the coming years is that society becomes dangerously psychotic. Yes, we are already psychotic. Addicted, fragmented and self-destructive.  But I mean clinically psychotic and on a civilizational scale.

We are already showing precursor symptoms: record antidepressant use, rising suicide rates, rampant addiction, and global increases in loneliness and anxiety disorders. These are all biomarkers of a species whose cognitive environment has outpaced its biology.

Human cognition evolved under conditions of slow change. Our nervous systems and social architectures were shaped for a world that changed near imperceptibly over millennia.

When things change faster than our native capacity, we lose coherence. The hippocampus binds the present to memory, and the prefrontal cortex constructs a coherent future.

When environments change too rapidly, when the map no longer matches the territory, the brain destabilizes.  This can trigger a cognitive dissonance cascade, where our core beliefs are invalidated so rapidly that we lose narrative coherence. When feedback loops in an organism can’t stabilize, the system oscillates until it breaks.  Civilization is entering that oscillatory phase.

At a collective level, this is the recipe for mass psychosis.

Historians call it cultural disintegration and psychologists call it dissociation. It means the same thing: when the story breaks, the organism panics.

The fragility of society
Our stability, both personal and collective, is built on identity, work, purpose, rule of law, religions, and social cohesion. These are shared fictions that create coherence for billions of us to manage the chaos of our existence.

AI is about to accelerate discontinuity beyond what our psyches can handle. For example:

1) Erosion of human agency: the threat is not just that AI will make us less "useful." It's that it will erode our sense of agency. Our belief that we are the causal authors of our lives. When AI can create, reason, and strategize more effectively than we can, our role shifts from actor to audience. This is the core of the looming global occupational identity crisis. Not just the loss of income, but the loss of purpose that comes when our work no longer feels essential.

2) Weakening of rule of law: autonomous agents will operate at speeds that make our legal systems seem geological in pace. Law will lag reality.

3) Hollowing out religions: faith has offered transcendence. AI may offer a more potent, personalized, and high res simulation of it. On demand.

Progress won’t wait around to ask for our permission.

Stability to resilience
Last week I wrote about how humans use moral frameworks to stabilize their reality. If you can’t win on position or strength, win on virtue. A moral inversion. It’s a human superpower to take a disadvantaged situation and turn it into a strength.

Society is currently built on stability and predictability, which has now become a liability. To cope and evolve, we need a moral inversion to prize resilience over stability.

To learn from biology, immunity isn’t defense. It’s adaptation through exposure. Resilience is not resistance to change, it’s the capacity to integrate adaptation without collapse.

A new moral philosophy
Our civilization worships wealth, power and status. They are the most prized and sought after possessions.

People will kill for them, die for them, and make others die so that they can die for them.

It’s a self-terminating feedback loop. A morality of entropy.

Don’t Die is the inversion of this moral architecture. It replaces the pursuit of domination with the pursuit of continuation.

Old religions glorified suffering as purification.
Don’t Die glorifies survival as intelligence.
Life’s value has always been implicit: it simply wants to keep on going.
We must now make it explicit.
Existence is the highest virtue.

An infinite game
We do not know what’s coming with AI.
It feels big and is happening quickly.

Yet it can be hard to look at it directly as it threatens our identities, possessions, and aspirations.

Don’t Die reframes this anxiety, offering a new promise: an infinite game.

Carse explains that a finite game has a start and end, a winner and loser. An infinite game has only one rule: keep the game going.

Don’t Die is an infinite game. A recognition that the highest form of intelligence is the refusal to self-destruct.

The zeroth law of alignment
A species running on a self-terminating moral code cannot hope to build a benevolent superintelligence.

The paradox of alignment is obvious: we cannot align what we have not aligned within ourselves.

A fragmented, self-destructive species teaches its machines the same incoherence.

Don’t Die is survival coherence. A philosophy and moral framework in the age of superintelligence. Its foundation is fidelity to existence itself and not fear.