it a year old product where you repeatedly mention AI functionality thats actually only an algorithm that predicts the movement of your leg.
Not a single negative point mentioned or not a single part where the viewer could think mhh what will his conclusion be?
Because you glaze the product form the beginning theres no suspense.
Id hook the viewer with something like is this really how people are going to be walking around in 10 years?
and then pros and cons.
- The app icon isnt centered visually
- iPhone widget? is that what were going to call it?
- Water moves with your phone? What a feature.
- Weekly price is fucking hideous.
- Where is the x button where i can cancel out of the sub
Sub in general is a joke. For 50 bucks id expect a lifetime subscription. If you have no server costs why wouldnt you make a 5 usd one time payment? no sub would be a selling point.
@MatthewBerman They measure googles ai 2x
no wonder googles sources are outweighing
This Just In: x mentions are strongest preditor for ai recommendations across grok, grok heavy and @ grok replies.
Google does this to be able to claim the carbon credits on saved emissions by their users.
They do the same on Google Maps by suggesting more ecological routes.
And then they add up the savings to counter their own emissions.
hey google flights can u pls not show me this guilttripping bs man
because taylor swift's private jet just did an extra trip cuz she forgot her phone on the way to her fav starbucks
and she doesn't have to see this
fuck off