@HouseCommerce It's a major step towards a police state with mass surveillance, infringing upon our 1st and 4th amendment rights
Shut the hell up about the "PROTECT THE KIDS" bs, we know the real purpose of the bill. If it were about kids, we'd have had the Epstein Files fully released by now
The KIDS Act violates our 1st and 4th Amendment rights, censors the internet for the party in charge to eliminate speech they don't like, and allows them to trace the speech directly back to people instead of being anonymous, because you'd have to scan your ID to gain access.
IMPORTANT CENSORSHIP NEWS:
The same censorship that hit the EU and UK has now started to unfold in the United States.
This vote will determine if we have a free internet without forced age verification.
I will be talking about this in a video discussing what's going on soon. This is not good at all..
Discord is beginning to implement Incode for age verification, a move that is already sparking serious privacy concerns among users. While Discord claims that Incode processes biometric data locally via on-device AI without permanent server-side logging, sharing sensitive IDs and selfies with any third-party vendor remains a massive red flag for many. Given Incode's controversial history with platforms like TikTok, where the vendor was heavily criticized for long retention periods and storing biometric data server-side, users who expect strict privacy are highly skeptical about handing over their biometrics, regardless of Discord's current technology claims.
Discord has started rolling out Incode for age verification. The system requires users to submit a government-issued ID and a selfie to confirm their age.
According to Discord, Incode processes biometric data locally on the user’s device using on-device AI and does not permanently store that biometric data on its servers.
Even so, the process requires users to share sensitive personal information with a third-party company.
Via:@WumpusCentral