After careful consideration and reviewing the current eligibility guidelines,
I’m officially declaring myself a @WNBA prospect.
If simply declaring who you are is all that’s required, then I meet every single requirement necessary to compete in the WNBA.
My team and I have carefully examined the WNBA’s eligibility criteria and governing framework surrounding self-identification and inclusion. Based on the current guidelines, I can and am officially declaring my eligibility for the upcoming WNBA draft in April 2027.
I know my presence on the court will stir up strong opinions.
I am definitely not here to mock, make fun of, or disrespect any community or personal choices.
I’m simply asking that the current rules be applied equally to everyone — the rules that represent the very values many WNBA players and coaches have publicly advocated for.
My team and I are prepared to ensure these guidelines are applied equally, consistently, and without exception, and I look forward to the #WNBA honoring its stated principles.
See you at training camp.
https://t.co/zlwWpVF0Ou
🚨 THE CLIP THAT BROKE THE INTERNET
Dana Bash: “You’re the HHS Secretary and you’re leading to vaccine hesitancy.”
RFK Jr.: “Do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy… or telling the truth?”
Bash: “The truth is that there is study after study…”
RFK Jr.: “You’re repeating it like a parrot. I’ve actually read the science. Let’s debate the science.”
Bash: “I’m not debating this with you.”
RFK Jr.: “Of course you won’t. Because all you know how to do is repeat what you’re told and say ‘trust the experts.’
That’s what you did during COVID.
Now we know Fauci was lying about everything — about masks, social distancing, natural immunity, vaccine transmission. He was lying… and you were punishing people for not trusting the expert.”
This is the moment the script died on live television.
No spinning.
No safe exit.
Just a host repeating talking points… and a guest who actually read the material refusing to play along.
This is why the clip is everywhere.
This is why it will not go away.
Watch it.
Save it.
Share it.
The era of “trust the experts or else” just got called out in real time — and the network had no answer. 🔥
When someone tells you that “99% of scientists agree that there is a climate crisis,” what he or she is really saying is that “99% of scientists agree that they don’t want to lose their funding.”
Since when do 99% of people agree on anything, especially these days?
What is unacceptable, are your lies and blatant hypocrisy.
You are RESPONSIBLE for replacement migration.
You blocked the registration of the @SaveEuropeAct, telling 600,000 people who want closed borders and remigration that they’re racists and against European values.
You’re not fooling us.
I'm not a racist. I'm a culturalist
I believe some cultures are superior to others
For example, I prefer cultures that do not encourage wife beating, paedophilia, clitorectomies, stoning and constant inflation of the male ego
I am also aware of the difference between Islamoscepticism and Islamophobia
Notice that hate does not come into this
Only moral preferences
We've open-sourced Grok Build and have reset usage limits for all users.
Open sourcing Grok Build allows anyone to support making a reliable and robust harness. Check out our code, including the Git repo for the Grok Build CLI.
https://t.co/3SSvPu2Nrz
Today is a dark day for freedom and democracy in Europe. General chat surveillance has been implemented in Brussels. A disgrace.
The so-called Chat Control 1.0 cleared a crucial hurdle in the European Parliament today. This means platforms may once again be allowed to scan private messages, officially on a “voluntary” basis, but in practice this marks the return of indiscriminate monitoring of private communication.
What makes this especially bitter is that a majority of the MEPs who voted were reportedly against it. According to Patrick Breyer, 314 MEPs voted against the regulation, 276 voted in favor and 17 abstained. And yet the rejection failed because it was not enough to have a simple majority of those voting. An absolute majority of all MEPs would have been required.
That is the democratic scandal.
When a majority of those present votes against a proposal and it still passes because a formal threshold is not reached, it does not feel like democratic decision-making to many citizens. It feels like a procedural trick.
And it becomes even more problematic when you look at the context: Chat Control had already been rejected before. Yet the issue was put back on the agenda shortly before the summer break, through an urgent procedure, at a time when absences could become decisive.
This is not just some technical regulation. It goes to the very core of private communication. It is about whether digital messages remain fundamentally private or whether platforms may systematically scan content again, without concrete suspicion, without a court order and without any individual cause.
A free society must not turn private communication into a potential surveillance zone. Anyone who takes digital fundamental rights seriously cannot accept millions of innocent people being placed under general suspicion.
Today, a dangerous signal was sent: fundamental rights can be hollowed out through procedural logic, timing and political tricks. Not through an open, clear and honest majority, but through a system in which absence effectively helps the supporters.
This is a dark day for Europe.
Not because the fight is over, but because today showed how easily digital fundamental rights come under pressure when surveillance logic, symbolic politics and institutional tricks come together.
Anyone who wants a free internet, anyone who wants to protect private communication and anyone who takes democracy seriously should talk about this.
Share this issue. Inform yourself. Look at who voted how. And never forget: freedom rarely disappears all at once. It disappears step by step, often in technical details, often in complicated procedures and often exactly when too few people are watching.
We looked up examples of Black English sentences:
"He be working late on Tuesdays."
"I'm finna go get some food."
"Don't nobody know where he went."
"She been finished that project."
In other words, not proper English....
This post must go so hard if you’re stupid.
Capitalism didn’t just build the iPhone, it made it possible.
Capitalism raised the capital, took the risk, and coordinated the vision.
Labor showed up because that capital arrived first.
No capital, no factory.
No factory, no jobs.
Capitalism > Socialism every single time.