I would recommend not engaging with anyone arguing the “trains are 200 year-old technology; we have planes and cars” position. (Both of which are more than a century old)
They don’t want a reasonable debate.
We will not persuade them.
We only give them more engagement/audience.
If the purpose of your transport project is economic development, tourism, “equity”, image, or monumentalism, don’t expect the result to be high ridership.
IF you want ridership, that has to be the guiding purpose from the beginning.
@AZinCLE@FernandoAg47@TaupeAvenger Thing is, they wanted trains that could extend the reach of the NEC into Virginia and Pennsylvania and Long Island and Massachusetts and Connecticut and Maine and the Carolinas, and didn’t have the political opportunity to extend track improvements or electrification there.
@pennslinger I always tell people that Philadelphia is a capital D Democratic City, but not necessarily a progressive one. We have lots of work to do here.
Unfortunately the state of Florida has strongly opposed getting buses out of mixed traffic, and actually removed a portion of the SunRunner’s dedicated transit lanes last year:
@RidePSTA There are some ways SunRunner could improve.
1. it can get rid of its mixed traffic segments which are in the most congested areas. (And after Rays games the lanes are blocked off by cops)
2. TSP is weak. My bus stopped at multiple intersections.
@Aden_Yacobi@abhishekarghya One agency, AC Transit in California, tried this strategy to a big extent in the 2000s with imported Van Hool buses but since decided to return to US procurement.
@Lib_Development@AZinCLE See the same chart but for last year. Within the realm of possibility that with their service reorganization late last year and higher ridership this year they might be close, although fuel costs would be something to watch for.
@PEWilliams_@TheOmniZaddy I’m not sure these USDOT Private Activity Bonds would have otherwise gone to housing development, as opposed to more highway projects as they largely have been…