@DanRSMiddleton @BioMedCentral This is surveillance bias. The cancer sites "significantly" associated with COVID-19 vaccination have national screening programmes (gastric, colorectal, lung, breast) or have incidence rates strongly affected by opportunistic screening (thyroid, prostate).
We are recruiting! Two fully funded PhD positions as part of the “Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence” hub on the mathematical foundations of AI. Further details at the link.
https://t.co/srwJmQT6yC
@MarvinSchmittML@sirbayes There is also an official "popular with friends" feed that includes content liked by people that you follow. It works better than the Discover feed.
https://t.co/hfyLZTakmE
Join us! We are currently advertising two faculty positions: Assistant Professor (Computational, Methodological or Theoretical Statistics or Machine Learning) and Assistant Professor (Mathematical Finance). https://t.co/42LD5NfZPV Deadline: Jan 6th
@esjesjesj It may sound like Musk has gone crazy here, but he was just explaining his belief in #TESCREAL - a bundle of philosophical ideas identified by @timnitGebru and @xriskology that are quite common in the tech world.
https://t.co/AHhsohYNCN
@nathancofnas@AdamRutherford I don't understand what you're trying to do here. Asking people their opinion on what would happen is not the same thing as finding out what would happen. And if you wanted to do an opinion poll on social attitudes to IQ then you've got no sampling frame to interpret the results.
"At first sight, the criticisms of #reviewer2 seem particularly hard to satisfy, given their overall conclusion that our methods are simplistic, unrealistic, not innovative and, in any case, we should have done something else. Nevertheless, we have addressed each one of them."
Si le populisme, le nationalisme, la xénophobie, le discours anti-migrants, l'europhobie et autre Brexit etc étaient la solution à quoi que ce soit, les conservateurs GB ne seraient pas face, demain, à la défaite la plus cuisante des 200 ans d'existence de leur parti 👇
Still proud of this line I put into a much-cited paper about an even-more-cited paper; "After rather negative referees' reports had been received, the first author went into a massive sulk for a year" https://t.co/NCF5Lgga7e
Lot of absurd takes like this on the superalignment team leaving OpenAI.
The more likely reason they left is not because Ilya and Jan saw some super advanced AI emerging that they couldn't handle but that they didn't and as the cognitive dissonance hit, OpenAI and other practical teams building real world AI are realizng this fantasy of super intelligent machines rising up and getting out of control is a waste of time, money and resources.
So they slowly and correctly starved that team of compute that could be used for more useful things like building capabilities into their products, which is what AI are, products.