David Sinclair explained why one meal a day might beat constant snacking.
Our bodies evolved for periods of hunger in the wild. Constant eating tells your system “everything’s fine, no need to fight aging.” But going longer without food flips on longevity genes that repair and protect you.
It’s one of those simple ideas that feels counterintuitive at first but makes a lot of sense when you think about human history.
In a world of endless food availability, strategically building in hunger could be one of the most powerful tools we have for long-term health and resilience.
What’s your experience with one meal a day or extended fasting?
@elonmusk Maybe Hollywood is playing 4D Chess on us. They're purposely releasing garbage so that we'll be begging for the A.I. Making it easier and cheaper for them to make in the end.
Legendary coach who maid 100 million on the backs of unpaid labor. Now wants to regulate the earnings of those who can finely earn fair market value. This is clown behavior.