Mbelli

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@Sarahisbit @MrSage @ItsmeAjayKV I would say most ran 5 months or less - Ethereum switched to proof-of-stake. The 2 cards I have had 30 days and 90 days of runtime

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@VydeogamzXD @Morrowmake The 32gb v100s for $450 2 weeks ago were nice …of course they are $800+ now

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@Morrowmake 2 on the way 😃

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@landontgreen The cards are passive - that’s the fans the open bench has on the end of them

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@regsky_ https://t.co/BpxLO29a09

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@NRGgg @NVIDIAGeForce @WholeSaleSean

[NRG @NRGgg]

NRG x @NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5090 GIVEAWAY 💥

We're celebrating being on the biggest stage by giving away an exclusive custom wrapped RTX 5090 to a lucky fan.

To enter:
🔸 RT this post
🔸 Follow @NRGgg
🔸 Tag a friend below

Terms and conditions apply.

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@unionalphaai I think this was a miss

[Jordan Schachtel @JordanSchachtel]

Two of the reporters on the byline are funded by the Tarbell Center, an AI doomer org controlled by Kamala Harris megadonor Dustin Moskovitz. Tarbell gives journalists large grants to insert AI doomer stories into prominent outlets. @TIME did not disclose the affiliation.

[Dr. Eli David @DrEliDavid]

Bernie, Obama, Mamdani, Kamala
See it already?

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead.

You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement.

I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible.

But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier.

Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want.

Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well.

So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it.

If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.

[Parker Thayer @ParkerThayer]

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.

2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.

According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.

The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.

Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.

And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.

What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?

3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.

It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.

4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@yume_arasaki @MiaAI_lab UD_Q4_K_M with dflash2 outperforms it with lower vram occupancy

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@MiaAI_lab Can the model hold up over a 200k context quantized though? Currently running ~120k on UD_Q4_K_XL. Definitely the best model I've run locally (4090) but struggles with longer tasks

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@Ravindra_PE That is a beautiful way to lose money 😂

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@aibullss Lost to both ewma and garch on every test I ran

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@0xTrackmind written in 2009

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@NVIDIAGeForce #RTXPowersPlay

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@AdamSchefter These generic AI bot replies on every post are annoying af

[Mbelli @matt_belliveau]

@Adaamset