Nothing could be further from the truth…but I guess facts aren’t really the forte of @StreetsblogSF in this instance…
Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland https://t.co/nUTItMMKkn
@MattSchrap of @HarborTruckers discusses California's zero-emission challenge: 157,000 chargers needed by 2030 for MHD and HHD BE vehicles, statewide. He notes, "The timelines that the state is trying to implement don't line up with reality." How can California bridge this gap?
Lloyd Christmas is no fool…(hopefully…lol)…
@CrosbyMaxx is the heart and soul of this team…as someone who has been a @Raiders fan my entire life, I am no stranger to disappointment, but getting rid of the #Condor would be beyond dumb. https://t.co/UhYLGu4lDv
@RapidRevolt@Oakland Ok…I will reach out and see if we can get something on the books…still doesn’t change the fact that the OMAST effort is being mischaracterized as removing all safety aspects of the plan…it is literally about safety.
@RapidRevolt@Oakland No one is attempting to kill anything. Again, misrepresenting facts. The proposed shift up to 4th and over to Jefferson and Clay is about safety.
@prinzrob The route is far from “new”…it is has been an established artery for quite some time… @RapidRevolt has misrepresented the facts for the sake of generating clicks. Pushing bikes and peds into a truck route is not safe…the request is to move the enhancements over 2 blocks.
@StreetsblogSF Nice try….you and your headline are “making stuff up”…y’all shirking responsibility and attempting misdirection is not shocking, but definitely disappointing. Perpetuating falsehoods for the sake of clicks is just plain irresponsible.
@MattSchrap of @HarborTruckers discusses California's zero-emission challenge: 157,000 chargers needed by 2030 for MHD and HHD BE vehicles, statewide. He notes, "The timelines that the state is trying to implement don't line up with reality." How can California bridge this gap?
@CA_Insider@harbortruckers The 157,000 number is for statewide deployment of chargers to support both MHD and HHD BE vehicles in 2030, not just for the ports. Important clarification.