@JayMGamma@davidclement No, the reasons are auto industry disappearing from Canada within 2-3 years and Canada no longer able to make trade deals with other countries like EU, UK, Japan, ASEAN, etc without the US approval. Try to follow.
@CoryBMorgan Yes, focus on the damned frenchies from Quebec and not the US wanting to control the countries Canada makes trade deals with whether they are market or non market economies. Canada would have required US approval for deals with Japan, UK, EU, ASEAN, etc. But eh, damned french.
@hoontalees@ashatku There is no trade imbalance. But if Trump is not happy with USMCA, he can go ahead and cancel it. He just have to give 6 months notice. It will be rough for a while in Canada but we will be fine again like we were doing fine before Reagan and Mulroney signed the first deal.
@MAAWLAW@davidcommon@CBCNews Additional demands like Canada not allowed to have trade deals with other countries without having US approval? The clause in USMCA specifies FREE trade deal with NON MARKET economies. US demand was ludicrous but you still think Canada should have signed it? You’re a US asset.
@GinnyRothTO@scoopercooper Right, it was because of the damn frenchies from Quebec that no deal was signed. It was not because the auto industry would have disappeared in 2 or 3 years and not because Canada would have required US approval to set trade deals with other countries like UK, EU, ASEAN, etc.
@SteveSaretsky@MAAWLAW The US wanted to extend that clause to all markets not just non-market economies. So the US could make deals with China but Canada couldn’t(ex:canola vs EV) and on top of that, we would no longer be able to make deal with free market economies like UK, EU, etc without US approval
@jamiljivani We know that people in your ridding would have lost their job in 2 or 3 years since trucks would have continue to be at 25% tariff. JD Vance said we have you to thank for that deal. Can you explain to the people of your ridding how this wonderful deal would have been beneficial?
@davidfrum Why relabeling is required? You think having both english and french on the bottle will confuse consumers and they won’t know the bottle contain wine if they see « vin » just beside on the label?
@MAAWLAW@CBCNews@MDimaintv@mhyattoffice@kdaniellepark@MAAWLAW is hysterical this morning. Post after post basing Canada non stop and praising the US. It makes you wonder. Either he has access to privilege knowledge of the trade talks or he is a US asset.
@DrJStrategy@DrJStrategy How is the Strait of Hormuz going? Is it opened yet? You said Trump was a genius and he showed the world how to deal with rogue state. But I’m a bit puzzled now. Do you still stand being your praise of Trump being a master negotiator?
@McFaul The US citizens think Canada took advantage of the US when the USMCA free trade deal has benefited the US the most. Compagnies and US labor groups are putting pressure on Trump to keep these illegals tariffs in place. Canada will derisk, decouple and move on. We will remember.
@MAAWLAW What about the US trade with China? The US/China volume is huge compared to Canada/China volume. We can be aligned on trade policy regarding non market economies without surrendering our sovereignty. The more I read your comments, the more you seem biased towards the US.
@mtlgazette With AI, instant translation to french of any manual, guarantees, etc is readily available to businesses of any size at $0. Products imported from the EU has often 5 or 6 languages on the product label. The US were trying to sow discord with that demand: « no deal because of QC »
@RHFontaine Your statements are ridiculous. There is actually a free trade deal. It’s called USMCA. US is not respecting it. Sectoral tariffs are covered by side letters in the USMCA and thus, tariffs on auto, steel, etc are illegals. As for China, the US trade more with it than Canada !!!