A collective of coal mine canaries. Any misspellings and/or abbreviations may be used as an opportunity to improve your grammar, syntax and spelling. Enjoy!
@MichelleObama Alyssa Thomas seems to think attempted homicide against Caitlin Clarke is "going high"... perhaps you need to explain it to her...unless she did exactly what you inspired & intended. cc: @JackPosobiec@SenTuberville
Phoenix Mercury associate head coach Kristi Toliver showed support on Instagram for Alyssa Thomas, who was suspended for one game for punching Caitlin Clark in the throat.
She included a quote from Michelle Obama’s 2016 DNC speech: “When they go low, we go high”
The full quote is: “How we explain that when someone is cruel, or acts like a bully, you don't stoop to their level - no, our motto is, when they go low, we go high."
Thomas punched Clark in the throat & kneed her in the groin, but Thomas is the victim?! This level of delusion must be studied…
@WNBA Suspension is totally inadequate. Alyssa Thomas is demonstrating she is a homicidal sociopath. Let's not wait for her to be successful at murder. cc: @JackPosobiec@SenTuberville
NEW: WNBA player Alyssa Thomas has been suspended after she cheap-shotted Caitlin Clark in the throat.
No foul was called during the game as Thomas was caught on camera jamming her fist into Clark's throat.
The league has now suspended Thomas for one game and will fine her $1000.
"Per WNBA rule, the League Office has the option, following its review of any game, to reclassify a Flagrant foul or to classify as Flagrant any foul not called as such during a game and may impose a fine and/or suspension," the WNBA said.
This brutality has to end.
They’re going to k*ll or permanently injure her.
Sue the league.
Let’s hear it … is a one-game suspension enough?
Justice. #caitlinclark
@WNBA Attempted homicide caught on live video; hiding behind a sports team uniform doesn't change the intent. Homicidal sociopaths must be removed & permanently banned from the sport as well as incarcerated. cc: @DAGToddBlanche@HarmeetKDhillon@JackPosobiec
This brutality has to end.
They’re going to k*ll or permanently injure her.
Sue the league.
Let’s hear it … is a one-game suspension enough?
Justice. #caitlinclark
New DOMINION 2020 Stolen Election documents expose:
ELECTION RECORD DESTRUCTION Across 5 States.
Labeling ELECTION SPEECH as TERRORISM.
CIA Analysts SUPPRESSING CCP Interference Assessment from the 2020 Election.
Also includes break down of TINA PETERS and other "preservers" being prosecuted and "destroyers" of evidence NOT being prosecuted, with cases being "suppressed."
1.) Systematic Obstruction of Legislative Subpoenas and Record Destruction Across 5 States:
Maricopa County defied Arizona Senate subpoenas for routers, Splunk logs, and EMS servers, producing only one of two subpoenaed servers, while 37,000+ identical database queries were run on the EMS server immediately after a court order, followed by clearing of the 2020 activity log.
Wisconsin Governor Evers directed state agencies not to comply with legislative subpoenas and dark-money organizations provided free legal counsel to government employees to enable non-compliance.
Michigan's Bureau of Elections ordered destruction of electronic pollbook data inside the federal 22-month preservation window.
Fulton County admitted in federal court to destroying the majority of in-person ballot images from the November 3 original count, 74 of 159 Georgia counties failed to produce ballot images.
At every level, the evidentiary record that would have answered the election-integrity question was made unavailable.
2.) Federal Prosecutorial Channel Closed, DOJ Routed Fraud Referrals to Conflicted State Officials:
Attorney General William Barr directed U.S. Attorney William McSwain, by McSwain's subsequent written attestation, to route all Pennsylvania election-fraud referrals to state AG Josh Shapiro, who had publicly pledged to "fight like hell" for the opposing candidate before the election.
DOJ Election Crimes Branch Director Richard Pilger resigned the same day Barr issued the authorization memorandum. Fifteen District Election Officers wrote to urge its rescission. Separately, DOJ National Security Division leadership had prior business ties to Hart InterCivic, a voting-system vendor whose equipment was under scrutiny.
The net effect was that the federal investigative channel was structurally closed during the certification window, routing all referrals to officials with documented conflicts of interest.
3.) Federal Agencies Used to Intimidate Auditors, DHS Labels Election-Integrity Speech a Terrorism:
Threat On May 5, 2021, DOJ's Civil Rights Division sent a letter to Arizona Senate Majority Leader Fann characterizing the state's own legislative audit as potentially unlawful voter intimidation.
On February 7, 2022, DHS issued a Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin placing "false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud" in the category of "terrorism threat drivers."
CISA, the federal agency charged with protecting election infrastructure, co-authored a Joint Security Guide with Dominion Voting Systems during active integrity litigation and later scrubbed its website of references to its domestic speech monitoring program after congressional oversight opened.
Operation Arctic Frost issued 197 grand-jury subpoenas and telecom metadata orders reaching 430+ Republican-aligned individuals, including sitting U.S. Senators and Representatives, accompanied by nondisclosure directives.
4.) Malicious Prosecution Inverted the Enforcement Hierarchy, Preservers Charged, Destroyers Unprosecuted:
Mesa County, Colorado Clerk Tina Peters was prosecuted for preserving forensic images of her county's election management system server, images that documented the deletion of 28,989 files, including 695 legally required log files, during a vendor-directed "trusted build" update.
The officials who authorized the update were not charged. In Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, state prosecutors brought felony indictments against alternate electors and the attorneys who advised them for conduct, drafting memoranda, giving legal advice, organizing contingent elector slates, historically treated as protected advocacy.
One state attorney general publicly stated the goal of putting defense counsel "away for life." The conduct documented in the election integrity record, deletions, process irregularities, chain-of-custody failures, with limited exceptions, not the conduct brought to indictment.
5.) CISA Declared Election "Most Secure" Without Forensic Audit, CIA Analysts Suppressed China Interference Assessment:
CISA Director Christopher Krebs declared the 2020 election "the most secure in American history" without conducting the forensic audit CISA's own July 2020 pre-election report had identified as necessary, and while CISA was simultaneously co-authoring security documentation with a vendor under active integrity scrutiny.
Director of National Intelligence Ratcliffe subsequently documented that career CIA analysts had suppressed the People's Republic of China election-interference assessment on political grounds, in direct violation of IRTPA Analytic Standard B governing objectivity and independence.
In Michigan, Secretary of State Benson's own attorney argued in open court that she "only follows laws she agrees with." Seven court rulings found that the Michigan Secretary of State issued unlawful guidance. The officials responsible for forensic assessment and enforcement declared the process clean before examining it.
KEY TAKEAWAY:
"The subpoenas were defied. The logs were cleared. The whistleblowers were interrogated. The auditors were threatened. The lawyers were indicted. The clerk who saved the server image was prosecuted. The officials who deleted the files were not. At every level, the power of government was not directed at the question of what happened, it was directed at the people asking it."
NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATION:
An adversarial foreign intelligence service does not need to penetrate an election system if the domestic oversight architecture has already been neutralized from the inside.
The Weaponization of Government record documents that every institutional layer capable of detecting, auditing, and responding to election irregularities, local canvassers, state legislatures, U.S. Attorneys, CISA, the Intelligence Community, and independent counsel, was either deterred, bypassed, or turned against those sounding the alarm.
That architecture remains intact and unreformed and represents an exploitable attack surface for any adversary planning around a close federal contest.
Anti-Israel.
Anti-America.
Anti-Western Civilization.
Why am I the only Democrat in the U.S. Senate that refuses to excuse this or defend any of those self-identified communists?
El método del Islam siempre es el mismo.
-Construcción de mezquitas.
-Creación de sociedades paralelas.
-Multiplicación rápida.
-Papel de víctima (minoría perseguida).
-Resistencia al Estado de derecho en el país de acogida.
-Explotación de lagunas legales.
-Introducción de la Sharia.
-Toma del poder.
Afganistán solía ser budista, Pakistán hindú y Líbano cristiano. Hoy todos son musulmanes.
Si continuamos por este camino, Europa caerá.
Vía @capTercio
Le communisme et le socialisme doivent être vus comme l’Hitlérisme. Ni plus. Ni moins.
Ce sont des idéologies totalitaires qui ont fait plus de 100 millions de morts au XXe siècle.
Voici leur bilan. Il est temps d’ouvrir les yeux.
Le bilan humain est accablant : URSS ~20 millions de morts (Holodomor génocide ukrainien, Goulags, purges staliniennes) ; Chine maoïste 65 millions+ (Grand Bond en avant + Révolution culturelle) ; Cambodge khmers rouges 2 millions en 4 ans (25 % de la population) ; et des millions d’autres en Corée du Nord, Vietnam, Cuba, Europe de l’Est, Amérique latine et Afrique.
Ce n’est pas une « mauvaise application » de l’idée. C’est le résultat inévitable : abolition de la propriété privée + planification centrale de l’économie + dictature du parti = famines organisées, camps et massacres de masse.
L’échec économique est systématique.
L’URSS s’effondre en 1991 dans la faillite et les pénuries. La Chine ne décolle qu’après avoir abandonné le maoïsme pour des réformes de marché.
Le Venezuela, laboratoire du socialisme du XXIe siècle : effondrement économique, hyperinflation record et plus de 7 millions d’exilés.
Les libertés ? Totalement écrasées. Zéro tolérance pour la dissidence. Surveillance de masse, camps de travail, propagande d’État. Le Mur de Berlin n’empêchait pas les gens d’entrer… il les empêchait de fuir le « paradis ouvrier ».
Aujourd’hui, la Chine perfectionne le totalitarisme avec le crédit social et les camps ouïghours.
Pourquoi ça échoue toujours ? Parce que ça va à l’encontre de la nature humaine et des lois économiques. Supprimer les incentives (propriété, profit, concurrence) tue la motivation et l’innovation. Le calcul économique rationnel est impossible sans marché (Mises).
C’est la route de la servitude (Hayek).
C’est exactement pour ça que le communisme et le socialisme doivent être traités comme l’Hitlérisme.
Des idées qui, au nom d’un collectif imaginaire, détruisent l’individu, la liberté et la prospérité.
À reléguer aux poubelles de l’histoire.
La solution n’est pas plus d’État ni plus de redistribution forcée.
C’est plus de liberté individuelle, de propriété privée, d’entrepreneuriat et de marchés libres.
C’est ce qui a sorti des milliards de personnes de la misère.
Pas les utopies collectivistes.
Ouvrez les yeux.
Le choix est clair.
Le communisme et le socialisme doivent être vus comme l’Hitlérisme. Ni plus. Ni moins.
Ce sont des idéologies totalitaires qui ont fait plus de 100 millions de morts au XXe siècle.
Voici leur bilan. Il est temps d’ouvrir les yeux.
Le bilan humain est accablant : URSS ~20 millions de morts (Holodomor génocide ukrainien, Goulags, purges staliniennes) ; Chine maoïste 65 millions+ (Grand Bond en avant + Révolution culturelle) ; Cambodge khmers rouges 2 millions en 4 ans (25 % de la population) ; et des millions d’autres en Corée du Nord, Vietnam, Cuba, Europe de l’Est, Amérique latine et Afrique.
Ce n’est pas une « mauvaise application » de l’idée. C’est le résultat inévitable : abolition de la propriété privée + planification centrale de l’économie + dictature du parti = famines organisées, camps et massacres de masse.
L’échec économique est systématique.
L’URSS s’effondre en 1991 dans la faillite et les pénuries. La Chine ne décolle qu’après avoir abandonné le maoïsme pour des réformes de marché.
Le Venezuela, laboratoire du socialisme du XXIe siècle : effondrement économique, hyperinflation record et plus de 7 millions d’exilés.
Les libertés ? Totalement écrasées. Zéro tolérance pour la dissidence. Surveillance de masse, camps de travail, propagande d’État. Le Mur de Berlin n’empêchait pas les gens d’entrer… il les empêchait de fuir le « paradis ouvrier ».
Aujourd’hui, la Chine perfectionne le totalitarisme avec le crédit social et les camps ouïghours.
Pourquoi ça échoue toujours ? Parce que ça va à l’encontre de la nature humaine et des lois économiques. Supprimer les incentives (propriété, profit, concurrence) tue la motivation et l’innovation. Le calcul économique rationnel est impossible sans marché (Mises).
C’est la route de la servitude (Hayek).
C’est exactement pour ça que le communisme et le socialisme doivent être traités comme l’Hitlérisme.
Des idées qui, au nom d’un collectif imaginaire, détruisent l’individu, la liberté et la prospérité.
À reléguer aux poubelles de l’histoire.
La solution n’est pas plus d’État ni plus de redistribution forcée.
C’est plus de liberté individuelle, de propriété privée, d’entrepreneuriat et de marchés libres.
C’est ce qui a sorti des milliards de personnes de la misère.
Pas les utopies collectivistes.
Ouvrez les yeux.
Le choix est clair.
El método del Islam siempre es el mismo.
-Construcción de mezquitas.
-Creación de sociedades paralelas.
-Multiplicación rápida.
-Papel de víctima (minoría perseguida).
-Resistencia al Estado de derecho en el país de acogida.
-Explotación de lagunas legales.
-Introducción de la Sharia.
-Toma del poder.
Afganistán solía ser budista, Pakistán hindú y Líbano cristiano. Hoy todos son musulmanes.
Si continuamos por este camino, Europa caerá.
Vía @capTercio
An American Christian man traveled to Nigeria to see what was going on with the ongoing massacre of Christians by Muslims. He witnessed the massacres firsthand.
Listen to him tell you about it himself. Why is nobody listening as Muslims yet again are committing a real genocide? You’re all so focused on the fake genocide that you do nothing about the real ones the Muslims are committing every day.
Where are those loud American “Christian” voices?
Where are YOU @megynkelly?
Where are YOU @TuckerCarlson?
Where are YOU @RealCandaceO?
You’re ALL frauds.
An American Christian man traveled to Nigeria to see what was going on with the ongoing massacre of Christians by Muslims. He witnessed the massacres firsthand.
Listen to him tell you about it himself. Why is nobody listening as Muslims yet again are committing a real genocide? You’re all so focused on the fake genocide that you do nothing about the real ones the Muslims are committing every day.
Where are those loud American “Christian” voices?
Where are YOU @megynkelly?
Where are YOU @TuckerCarlson?
Where are YOU @RealCandaceO?
You’re ALL frauds.
Tucker Carlson Says He Used to Criticize Islam, but Now He Sees the Light
Tucker Carlson has issued a mea culpa, but not the one he needs to issue. The Clash Report reported Thursday that the newly antisemitic news personality “publicly disavowed his previous hostile statements regarding Islam and issued a sharp critique of Donald Trump’s foreign policy record.” Yet what Carlson actually offered was a parade of straw men. He misrepresented his own previous comments, and then went on to misrepresent the U.S. conflict with Iran and the state of Israel as well. Carlson clearly thinks that there is nothing he can say or do that will result in him losing his massive audience.
“Many times I said on television,” Carlson said Thursday, “‘The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.’ And I believed that. I was hysterical. I believed that. No, that’s not true. Nothing about that is true, but I believed it.”
I can’t say that I’ve seen more than a handful of Tucker Carlson’s shows, at best, but I can nevertheless state categorically and with one-hundred percent certainty that Tucker Carlson never actually said “The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.”
Tucker Carlson is committing the all too common fallacy of conflating Islam and Muslims. In reality, to say that there are problems with Islam, or even that “the problem with Islam,” doesn’t say anything about “all Muslims,” because there are degrees of knowledge of the religion and commitment to it among Muslims, just as there are among adherents of all religions. No serious analyst ever says “all Muslims want to kill us,” or that all the members of any group want to do anything.
If Tucker Carlson had ever said on his Fox show or anywhere else that “all Muslims want to kill us,” he would have been the object of screaming headlines, excoriating him for his “Islamophobia” and demanding that he retract, apologize, end his show, and do various forms of public penance such as visiting a mosque or chatting with officials of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). None of that ever happened, because Tucker never said this.
Also, those of us who did dare to point out that Islam had doctrines of warfare against unbelievers were smeared, defamed, marginalized, deplatformed, and silenced. If Tucker Carlson had said this, which we were accused of saying but that none of us ever actually said, he would never have been allowed to continue to occupy his massive platform.
Compounding Tucker Carlson’s dishonesty here is the fact that he is also making claims about Islam and dismissing those claims as “hysterical,” and will never allow anyone who believes that there is a problem with Islam, or that the problem is Islam, onto his show to discuss it with him. He is, of course, free to feature anyone he wants, but his is not exactly a platform for open and honest discussion of the relevant issues that will allow for opinions that differ from those that Tucker Carlson holds. That also is his right, but when he makes sweeping claims that are false, as he does here, he does his audience an even greater disservice than usual. What about the Qur’an’s violent teachings? What about Islam’s doctrines of conquest and subjugation? Do they simply not exist now because Tucker Carlson says they’re hysterical?
Unfortunately, the jihadis are not uncomfortable with this particular brand of hysteria, and will keep advancing, no matter what Tucker Carlson says.
Read more at the link in the next post.
Tucker Carlson Says He Used to Criticize Islam, but Now He Sees the Light
Tucker Carlson has issued a mea culpa, but not the one he needs to issue. The Clash Report reported Thursday that the newly antisemitic news personality “publicly disavowed his previous hostile statements regarding Islam and issued a sharp critique of Donald Trump’s foreign policy record.” Yet what Carlson actually offered was a parade of straw men. He misrepresented his own previous comments, and then went on to misrepresent the U.S. conflict with Iran and the state of Israel as well. Carlson clearly thinks that there is nothing he can say or do that will result in him losing his massive audience.
“Many times I said on television,” Carlson said Thursday, “‘The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.’ And I believed that. I was hysterical. I believed that. No, that’s not true. Nothing about that is true, but I believed it.”
I can’t say that I’ve seen more than a handful of Tucker Carlson’s shows, at best, but I can nevertheless state categorically and with one-hundred percent certainty that Tucker Carlson never actually said “The problem is Islam. The problem is Muslims. They all want to kill us. They’re all crazy. They’re all in this lunatic suicide cult created by Muhammad in the 7th century.”
Tucker Carlson is committing the all too common fallacy of conflating Islam and Muslims. In reality, to say that there are problems with Islam, or even that “the problem with Islam,” doesn’t say anything about “all Muslims,” because there are degrees of knowledge of the religion and commitment to it among Muslims, just as there are among adherents of all religions. No serious analyst ever says “all Muslims want to kill us,” or that all the members of any group want to do anything.
If Tucker Carlson had ever said on his Fox show or anywhere else that “all Muslims want to kill us,” he would have been the object of screaming headlines, excoriating him for his “Islamophobia” and demanding that he retract, apologize, end his show, and do various forms of public penance such as visiting a mosque or chatting with officials of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). None of that ever happened, because Tucker never said this.
Also, those of us who did dare to point out that Islam had doctrines of warfare against unbelievers were smeared, defamed, marginalized, deplatformed, and silenced. If Tucker Carlson had said this, which we were accused of saying but that none of us ever actually said, he would never have been allowed to continue to occupy his massive platform.
Compounding Tucker Carlson’s dishonesty here is the fact that he is also making claims about Islam and dismissing those claims as “hysterical,” and will never allow anyone who believes that there is a problem with Islam, or that the problem is Islam, onto his show to discuss it with him. He is, of course, free to feature anyone he wants, but his is not exactly a platform for open and honest discussion of the relevant issues that will allow for opinions that differ from those that Tucker Carlson holds. That also is his right, but when he makes sweeping claims that are false, as he does here, he does his audience an even greater disservice than usual. What about the Qur’an’s violent teachings? What about Islam’s doctrines of conquest and subjugation? Do they simply not exist now because Tucker Carlson says they’re hysterical?
Unfortunately, the jihadis are not uncomfortable with this particular brand of hysteria, and will keep advancing, no matter what Tucker Carlson says.
Read more at the link in the next post.