Max Marmer

Entrepreneur, Long/Short Global Macro, Writer, Biohacker, Multidimensional Coach,

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@Manu_Sisti claude

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@AlfieJCarter Vault

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

Nothing in the Epstein Files is a surprise.

It's the Tip of the Iceberg.

Deeper Darker material will be released after humanity has metabolized this release.

It's being slowly dripped so people don't have psychotic breaks as core assumptions in their worldview fail.

All higher timelines, individually and collectively, require the Courage to meet Truth with Clarity.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

It's fascinating so many people believe still believe the random mutation algorithm of Darwinian Evolution and Natural Selection could have created the human body.

This video is circulating recently and is bursting many people's bubble on that belief.

And the true story is far more interesting and complex than the Abrahamic Creationist perspective of "It's All God's Creation".

Which connects to a related over-simplification in new New Age Spirituality where many people believe they are talking directly to God.

This Reality and Creation is a Multidimensional Projection of Divine Consciousness that flows through Dimensions, Planes and Densities.

And so all human communication in corporeal bodies is not directly in touch with God or Source — that would fry the nervous system and send the intermediate vessel of the Soul straight out of the magical corporeal vessel known as the Human Body otherwise known as death.

This also connects with the primary axiomatic flaw of the Mainstream Scientific Materialists.

They believe a linear, upward expression of emergent complexity from primordial energy (Math -> Physics -> Chemistry -> Biology -> Sociology -> Technology).

One can never create a Theory of Everything from this perspective because Reality primarily Descends from the Highest Dimensions downward.

Simulation Theory is the accepted Soup du Jour that directionally aligns with this perspective but also is embedded with fundamental flaws about the true nature of reality, consciouness and individuated expression as human beings.

Net net: "I'm not saying it was the Aliens...but it was the Aliens!"

[Andrew Côté @Andercot]

It just seems implausible this is what we are made of, essentially, nanotechnology about a billion years beyond anything we can design or make ourselves.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

I expected Bitcoin to perform better in this environment, at a minimum, to maintain its high-beta correlation with tech stocks.

That it hasn’t is a major blow to its central value proposition.

Its lack of performance over the last year is also evidence for what I argued in the previous essay: that the financialization of Bitcoin is likely destroying its most essential claim to uniqueness: its fixed supply.

Financialization effectively uncaps the 21-million-coin limit.

And the mechanism by which this price suppression occurs is extremely unlikely to be unwound at any point in the future.

The way financialization suppresses price is complex. I only understand it deeply because I’ve spent years studying the gold and silver markets, along with the tools, techniques, and structural tricks used to manipulate those markets for the last fifty years—and how that suppression is only now unwinding like a coiled spring.

Interestingly, one of Bitcoin’s intellectual heroes: Saifedean Ammous, author of The Bitcoin Standard, does not appear to understand how the silver market actually works.

An excerpt from his writing has been circulating recently among people I follow:

“This explains why the silver bubble has popped before and will pop again if it ever inflates: as soon as significant monetary investment flows into silver, it is not as difficult for producers to increase the supply significantly and bring the price crashing down, taking the savers’ wealth in the process. The best-known example of the easy-money trap comes from silver itself, of all commodities. Back in the late 1970s, the very affluent Hunt brothers decided to bring about the remonetization of silver and started buying enormous quantities of silver, driving the price up. Their rationale was that as the price rose, more people would want to buy, which would keep the price rising, which in turn would lead to people wanting to be paid in silver. Yet, no matter how much the Hunt brothers bought, their wealth was no match for the ability of miners and holders of silver to keep selling silver onto the market. The price of silver eventually crashed and the Hunt brothers lost over $1bn, probably the highest price ever paid for learning the importance of the stock-to-flow ratio, and why not all that glitters is gold.”

This passage gets several critical things wrong:
• Silver’s price inelasticity
• The delayed supply response caused by silver being primarily mined as a byproduct
• What actually happened during the Hunt Brothers episode
• And it significantly underrepresents silver’s nature as a Giffen good; an asset that can attract more buyers as its price rises

A fusion of gold and silver with digital currency, in the form of an asset-backed digital currency (ABDC), paired with flexible digital payment infrastructure, will likely have far more long-term staying power than Bitcoin.

For all the genuinely impressive things about Bitcoin and blockchain technology, one of Bitcoin’s biggest problems is Bitcoiners themselves.

Many believe they are intellectuals and revolutionaries, but the majority give off the vibe of frat-boy cultist pyramid-scheme salesmen larping as erudite thinkers.

Meanwhile, the darker truth is that Bitcoin was long-planned by intelligence agencies as a gateway drug, designed to acclimate the public to digital currencies so that far more tyrannical, state-controlled systems could be introduced between roughly 2026 and 2035.

Whether they’re branded as CBDCs, stablecoins, or something else entirely is mostly cosmetic.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@Tony_Royle can you share a link from where this screenshot is from?

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

A large segment of people I know are heavily over allocated in Crypto vs. Metals.

And yet, Bitcoin is collapsing in Gold and Silver terms.
Silver has significantly performed Bitcoin over the last 5 years.

As I've been saying Bitcoin likely made a permanent forever top against gold and silver in Q1 2025.
People don't realize how serious the Wall Street Financialization of Bitcoin was to the core Bitcoin thesis.

Various Financialization methods — notably Rehypothecation are a death knell for Bitcoin.

Ironically Rehypothecation is one of the primary methods Wall Street used to suppress the price of Silver for the last century.

And the vertical price movement you're now seeing in Silver is the coiled spring mechanism of financialization that is now breaking.

It's demand for physical gold and silver in the East as both a monetary asset and essential critical input in industrial process that's breaking the financialization.

But Bitcoin realistically won't be able to break this financial suppression mechanism.

Thus the Bitcoin/Monetary Metals Top is in.
Will have prioritize finishing the long essay outlining the detailed technical mechanisms underpinning this thesis.

Meanwhile the returns we're posting are quite literally off the charts.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@spwfeijen Ugc

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@coldemailchris Prompts

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

Who positioned for this once in a lifetime gold and silver bull when I said it was time?

The catalysts remain overwhelming.

Western capital, retail and institutional alike, is still barely allocated and only now beginning to chase.

Yes, it will be volatile.

No, the move is not even close to over.

$8,000–$10,000 gold and $150–$250 silver are realistic targets by the end of next year and will exceed $40,000 Gold and $500 Silver by the time the monetary reset is complete.

The right gold and silver miners will outperform everything.

Except well timed leverage on the underlyings (which we have done — with positions we bought under 2 months ago in our option ladder returning 500% to 1050% — ballooning to our largest holdings).

Meanwhile, the crypto balloon is deflating.

Bitcoin, despite the prevailing narratives, most likely made its permanent top relative to gold and silver in Q1 2025

(I’m finishing a longer essay that explains why.)

We are in the midst of the final act of an entire monetary era.

50, 80 and 100 year cycles have converged: Secular Disinflation, World Reserve Currency Status, Sovereign Debt Cycle.

Energy is now rapidly flowing down Exeter’s Pyramid.

Everything is being re-valued against the monetary metals.

Later, there will be a moment to re-allocate:
in the rubble of the collapse of the everything bubble: stocks, bonds, real estate, crypto

For now, this is a rare and “precious” window to be positioned correctly for what many have ignored is now happening way faster than many thought.

[Oren Elbaz @thesilverhermit]

Within five years, the narrative on Wall Street will change completely. Within five years, everyone will tell you that bonds are the worst place to be, and that tech stocks are a very risky business. Within five years, every stockbroker will sing the praises of physical #Gold and #Silver, and they will become the bedrock of every portfolio. This, of course, will happen only after most of the move in precious metals has already occurred. There will still be good reasons to own them, but they will no longer yield the same crazy returns.
So please remember who has been telling you to buy gold and silver before it was fashionable. Those were not the big accounts here on X with millions of followers. On the contrary, those were a ragtag group of anonymous analysts, who studied their history and saw the writing on the wall. I am proud to be counted among them.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

@stackhodler @PiQSuite Yes but many crypto’s duplicate this functionality. And others have better privacy properties and lower fees. Monero. Zcash.

Therefore other cryptos significantly out compete bitcoin on this utility function.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

It's really quite amazing the ratio of people currently invested in crypto shitcoins with no intrinsic value relative to those invested in junior gold and silver miners...all in the midst in what will likely go down as the greatest bull market in gold and silver's history by the time it's done.

In the last 2 true gold and silver miner bull markets they produced returns of:

2300% and 3800%

One of the goals of the coordinated massive crypto marketing campaign was to steer the masses away from Gold and Silver, while the wealthiest investors, institutions and nation states discretely built massive positions before the re-valuation / re-monetization event.

One thing the crypto market proves is the appetite for pursuing the possibility of extreme returns.

Wait until this crowd finally figures out about junior gold and silver miners.

They're flying incredibly high right now and yet are still extremely under owned and undervalued, in part because the speculative masses don't even know about them yet...but when they find their way here...oh lord.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

Sums it up

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

(3/3)


In the interest of transparency, I have a stake in this question. My company, TrueSelf (https://t.co/53Ncko09Az), combines personality testing with astrological frameworks and generative AI—including Western astrology, Vedic astrology, Chinese astrology, Human Design, Gene Keys, Numerology, Spiral Dynamics, and the Enneagram. We have a great free profile and a premium one.

Our users consistently report that it’s the most accurate personality profile they’ve ever received.

We could readily design a replication: generate 37 TrueSelf profiles from natal charts and test whether profiles can be matched to individuals using only basic facts about their lives. The study’s takeaway suggests performance should be random and that people would accept any profile as their own.

In my experience reviewing thousands of profiles, many fit “like a glove.” That TrueSelf uses generative AI for chart analysis further reduces human interpreter bias.

From my perspective, it’s simple: if astrology didn’t work, TrueSelf wouldn’t be so accurate.

What’s needed on the question of whether astrology works is not another biased test design and perfunctory dismissal, but transparent, preregistered, and replicable studies where astrologers are fully involved in reviewing both methodology and results.

I welcome collaboration to design such a test.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

(2/3)

The response raised additional concerns.
Spencer: “We considered this but decided not to release the birth dates/times/locations because we concluded it could make it easier to identify the study subjects / cheat.”

This explanation is not well-substantiated. With a small, de-identified sample, it’s difficult to see how outsiders could identify participants or cheat from birth date, time, and location alone.

After the study concluded—when cheating was no longer possible—I asked again.

Spencer: “We decided not to publish the birth dates/times as it would make de-anonymizing our study subjects easier—so out of concern for their personal information we decided not to release it.”

Again, this raises methodological concerns. If anonymization were truly the obstacle, participants could have provided consent to share chart data without names. For a study like this, finding volunteers willing to do that should be feasible.

For this test to be considered valid, credible astrologers should review both inputs and outputs for methodological accuracy. I know multiple astrologers willing to examine whether the setup and evaluation were fair and appropriate.

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

I’ve said for a long time if you want a sanity check on whether the dark web of power is as vast as it sometimes appears or whether that is an hallucination…

Look at the level of coordinated control required to pull off:

The 9/11 False Flag Terrorist Attacks,

The Covid Vaccine Bioweapons and

Suppression of the Epstein Files.

Your Spiritual Litmus test is the capacity to swallow and metabolize Truth, no matter how dark it gets

Without breaking, losing faith or stepping out of Love and Trust in God.

Most go into naive denial and blissful ignorance or fall into a depressive black pilled swamp.

The Truth is in neither of these extremes.

There is a Golden Path through the Darkness.

Your test is to find the perspectives, actions and frequencies that carry you all the way through.

🕊️🦋⚡️

[Max Marmer @maxmarmer]

2/ it’s important to tie this in to the whole story around the global sovereign debt bubble and when that may pop to understand the timing and politics about when the tide may turn against tether.

Given the US fiscal situation when will they not need an outlet of a large net buyer of treasuries?

There appears to be some agreement where the US gov looks the other way on Tether’s fraudulent practices as long as they are a larger net buyer of treasuries.

What’s a catalyst for that to change?