Max Reel 🟧

[Max Reel 🟧 @maxreell]

$BTC got a little brother with the introduction of Digital Matter Theory! DMT is a meta procotol that can only be done on #Bitcoin. Check out @TheBlockRunner guys and @tap_protocol to learn about this groundbreaking tech stack. $TAP $NAT $GIB

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

Is someone telling you fees can secure Bitcoin?

The explorable has a new fee market feature. Take the 24-second tour, then test it yourself: build a scenario, find the ceiling, see why it's almost impossible. 👇

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

To replace the block subsidy with fees alone, fees would have to rise over 100×. At that price, nobody transacts. $NAT sustainable

Fees alone can't pay for security. A market can. Tokenized Security

[NAT.FUN @natdotfun]

These aren't NFTs inspired by Bitcoin.
They're made OF it.

Every UNATOM starts with a real block. Bitcoin provides the data, and the data becomes the art.

1/7 🧵Let's reverse-engineer one.

[Max Reel 🟧 @maxreell]

@coinbureau Totally agree. $NAT created by Bitcoin.

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

How much Bitcoin security does $1 actually buy?

The explorable now shows it. A new Security per $1 of market cap readout, where a dollar of $NAT buys nearly 200× more than a dollar of BTC by 2048.

Build any scenario, then share it in one tap. 20-second tour 👇

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

Open letter to @MARA @MARAFoundation_ @fgthiel

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

There is an alternative idea that runs in parallel to transaction fees and doesn't affect usability on bitcoin. $NAT is auto credited on each block to the same address that received the coinbase reward. Clip-BITCOIN RAILS #62 @isabelfoxenduke @neha

https://t.co/CRR9Ezpumf

[人之狂 @kuang9303]

市场短期靠情绪，长期靠逻辑。

$NAT 的逻辑极强：比特币需要第二补贴，它就提供了最干净的解决方案。

情绪波动时有人卖出，逻辑清醒的人反而会持续买入。

时间永远站在逻辑这边。

$NAT #Bitcoin #DMT

[Market Mates @MktMates]

This Thursday 7pm EST the lads from @TheBlockRunner join us LIVE for a chat about all things Crypto!

This will be a banger show to end the week! Make sure you click follow so you don't miss this one!

[FITZY @fitzyOG]

https://t.co/QXTFQ4ux5i

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

Dollar for dollar of market cap, $NAT funds about 6× more block security than Bitcoin — and price is not needed for that calculation.

~6.3× today — and it steps up at every halving. By the 2048 halving, it will be nearly 200x per dollar- block security in favor of NAT vs BTC

[ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast 🟧 @TheBlockRunner]

Bitcoin is going to DIE

...without out ethereum:0x249130f5e2dd4cf278180c0df8273f3592ad1247

[Trac Network @TracNetwork]

If we are to truly own our things, then all digital media must inherit more of the properties of physical media.

Crypto proved that digital value can be owned.

NFTs, from artists such as Beeple and others, helped popularise ownership of digital media.

But most larger-forms of media today still do not behave this way. They remain under totally centralised control.

Games, music, films, podcasts, and interactive experiences are usually accessed through accounts, platforms, servers and from behind paywalls.

Sure, access to these things can be granted.

But that access can also be revoked at any time!

That is not ownership.

Even if large media files such as games were launched as NFTs, they wouldn't be multiplayer compatible, so online gaming with friends would be lost.

Also the costs of storing entire games fully on-network isn't something that would scale well anyway.

But the good news is that it doesn't have to be this way.

In 2025, in order to demonstrate the gaming capabilities of our peer-to-peer network, we released a fully p2p multiplayer version of the classic game DOOM.

A sovereign version that can be downloaded, and played multiplayer with only internet access required.

There are no central servers.

No cloud dependencies.

No platform gatekeepers.

And no permission needed from Trac Network itself.

Just a free download of the game, that lives on your device, and cannot be revoked.

This is true digital ownership, and we encourage more game developers to utilise Trac for gaming use cases.

Digital ownership of media shouldn't only be reserved for collectibles.

It should be extended to truly ownable, sovereign gaming and more.

This is the future that Trac Network enables today.

Trac DOOM is available now on @itchio 🎮
https://t.co/BxvMyWvhYm

[Trac Network @TracNetwork]

FORGE by @sloppr_ai is a powerful demonstration of where AI monetisation is heading:

no subscriptions needed

no token-count pricing

and not scraped expertise repackaged for free, which is killing the creator economy.

FORGE is an answer-as-a-service marketplace where users pay for successful, cited answers.

Where the experts whose knowledge powers those answers earn from usage. 💰

This is exactly the kind of value coordination and verification infrastructure that @TracNetwork is uniquely built to support!

> Access
> Attribution
> Proofs
> Receipts
> Payout logic

And all across either fiat rails or crypto-native systems.

The FORGE platform is a great demonstration that Trac can support knowledge-backed economies that feel simple for mainstream users, while still enabling the deeper infrastructure needed for truly verifiable AI markets.

AI doesn't just need better models.

It needs better economic rails for the knowledge those models depend on.

Sloppr just launched the Spotify for knowledge, and it's powered by Trac Network 💪

[FITZY @fitzyOG]

The more I think about SAUCE, the more I think that a classic search-engine comparison is one of the easiest ways to understand why it matters 🔍

and before we get started here, i think clarification of what sauce stands for is valuable context:

𝐒 𝐀 𝐔 𝐂 𝐄:

𝐒ource
𝐀ttribution &
𝐔sage
𝐂ompensation
𝐄ngine

Anyway, now that we have that out of the way, let's get going.

Search engines have always helped people discover public information online.

But some of the most valuable knowledge is not public.

It can't be public, as it would immediately lose its value.

The rise of LLMs will continue to make this exponentially worse, as agents continue trawling the internet 24/7, scraping as much knowledge and data as they can to try and obtain an edge within a particular domain.

Of course, the classic paywall model has been available for many years, with subscriptions offering paid access to expertise knowledge.

But, the thing about traditional paywalled content is that once you're behind the wall, you can see EVERYTHING, and the platform charges you that price regardless of how much you consume.

For example, I myself have had a @RealVision subscription for many years now, but if i'm being totally honest with, i've never maximised (not even close) my access to all of the deep knowledge and expertise that people like @RaoulGMI have been putting out for over a decade now.

If a platform such as RV adopted a SAUCE-style model, users would only need to pay for knowledge/alpha they benefitted from.

So SAUCE represents the arrival of an entirely new model for agentic knowledge-economies.

Real world knowledge, insight and expertise can now be accessed and paid for at a rate relative to the direct answer your question triggers.

And here's a really cool part.....if SAUCE doesn't have any relevant source material to be able to sufficiently answer your question, it tells you that, and charges you nothing.

And that's something we most definitely do NOT see from all these LLMs! 😬😂

This actually leads me to a point I want to REALLY elucidate here:

Unlike traditional AI tools, including LLMs, which are models built in to of training data, or that scrape the entire internet to try and piece together a suitable answer for the user, SOURCE only consults the source materials and knowledge it has on record.

SAUCE evaluates and values submitted knowledge so it can determine how useful that source is, when it should be used, how it should be attributed, and how much contributors should be compensated for their knowledge.

And although this post is not an architectural breakdown, it is most definitely worth highlighting the role @TracNetwork plays in making this possible.

The knowledge itself does not need to be public or stored on Trac.

That would defeat the whole point of SAUCE, because the contributor’s source material could be viewed/copied.

Instead, SAUCE keeps the knowledge protected, while Trac stores proofs around all activity within the platform's knowledge economy.

This can include proofs of source, content hash, vaulting, valuation, usage, attribution, compensation, removal, revocation, and $TAP burn activity.

In other words, the content stays gated, but all the important events around that content are immutably provable.

This entire model has huge future implications for enterprise adoption of decentralised technologies along with agentic systems and processes.

And the fact that any token, from any chain/network (or fiat for that matter) can be integrated direclty into systems such as these when built with @TracNetwork, means that if this model were to take off in coming months and years, then Trac will gain an entirely new group of builders and appreciators around its ecosystem.

Many people claim they have 'the sauce', and now we can finally measure it in monetary terms.

Follow @fitzyOG for more in-depth breakdowns of innovative technologies. 🤝

[TAPscope @TAP_scope]

Introducing SAUCE:

Source
Attribution &
Usage
Compensation
Engine

This is the dawn of the AI knowledge-economy, and it’s powered by @TracNetwork and @tap_protocol

https://t.co/xEfzLvzCSR

🧵

[NAT-man @BeyondOrdinals]

@AltcoinDaily $DMT-NAT https://t.co/MPXPdSoq06

[FITZY @fitzyOG]

I promise you this:

all the BIP-110 drama and debates are not even 1% as important as growing understanding of the economic holes in Bitcoin's core foundations today

There is a BIG reason many of the world's largest mining pools are adopting NAT as an additional revenue stream

[Choirzooh @choirzooh]

Six fixes have been proposed for Bitcoin's security budget. Only one doesn't put Bitcoin itself at risk

Fork it, dilute it, neglect it, or hand it to a state — every other fix changes what makes Bitcoin Bitcoin. $NAT changes none of it: no fork, no new issuance, market-funded

[Deaundre Howard🟧 @HowardDeaundre]

Imagine $NAT 10 years from now 🤫.