David May

I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

[David May @mayd]

A used book I ordered online arrived today (Boxing Day). I noticed this written inside it.

[Imtiaz Mahmood @ImtiazMadmood]

Two days after Henry died Hampshire Police secretly recorded Digwa in a police van speaking Punjabi to his brother. Digwa admitted stabbing Henry. Discussed claiming self defence. Made zero mention of racial abuse. Not one word.

Hampshire Police had that tape.

They knew Digwa was lying about the racist attack. They had the evidence. They had his own words and then tried to smear Henry as the aggressor anyway.

Three days after his death their statement read “it was reported two men had been assaulted by an unknown man.” Henry was the unknown man. The boy bleeding out on the street. They flipped it.

Family complained. Statement changed. Then police told the family their NEXT update would again infer Henry was the initial aggressor. His family had to fight them a second time. While grieving their murdered son.

Then during the trial Hampshire tried to issue a statement telling the public to stop talking about it online. Calling it disinformation. The CPS had to step in. Told them they were about to collapse their own murder case.

This is the force that handcuffed a dying boy. Missed the murder weapon twice. Had a secret tape proving the killer lied. And still tried to bury Henry's name.

That's not incompetence. That's a machine protecting itself. At the expense of a dead boy's reputation and three officers are still on active duty. Not suspended. Treated as witnesses. To their own actions.

Hampshire Police didn't just fail Henry on that street. They kept failing him for six months after he died.

- @Banksycat

[卄𝐎ù𝔰ε 𝐨𝔣 ℙｏє𝐌 _ @P0eMPieDinges]

The Netherlands also has its Henry Nowak cases.

In July 2020, 14-year-old Tamar from Marken was hit by a car on a dark dike road and left to die. Her body was later found in the berm.
What happened next is deeply disturbing.

The police initially told her mother that the driver was German. Days later the truth came out: it was four Iraqis in the car. The mother was told they withheld the real background because they didn’t want to create a "Wilders-effect" — they didn’t want to give Geert Wilders political ammunition.

Even worse: evidence strongly suggests Tamar’s body was moved after the accident. The driver didn’t just flee, they dragged her off the road and left her there like an animal.

The driver received only a €1,500 fine for looking at his phone while driving. He then disappeared completely. The fine was returned “undeliverable” and for years he was untraceable.

Only after years of fighting by the family (including going to court to force prosecution), a breakthrough came in March 2026: the now 33-year old Jamal is finally being prosecuted for causing the fatal accident and leaving the scene.

Just like Henry Nowak in Southampton — an innocent young person dies, authorities seem more focused on protecting a narrative and avoiding “political incorrectness” than on delivering swift justice.
A 14-year-old girl dies on a Dutch dike. The system lies about the identity of the driver, gives him a slap on the wrist, loses him for years, and only after massive pressure does real prosecution begin.

This is not just a traffic accident. This is a story about truth, accountability, and what happens when institutions put ideology before grieving families.

Her name was Tamar.
She was 14.
She deserved better.

♡

[The Noticer @NoticerNews]

Two gangs of machete-wielding African and Asian thugs fought at Melbourne's Flinders Street Station last night.

Six males were arrested after being caught with machetes at the scene, but just one was charged and he was released on bail.

[David May @mayd]

@AvidCommentator The motto of every Australian university:

Never mind the quality, feel the width.

[Willis Eschenbach @WEschenbach]

I see lots of folks saying Vance shouldn't comment on UK politics and society.

Meanwhile, here's a number of the comments by UK politicians about the death of the criminal drug addict George Floyd … so please, save your hypocrisy for someone who cares.

w.
===

A number of senior UK politicians condemned George Floyd’s killing in 2020, and several – especially from Labour and other opposition parties – publicly “took the knee” in solidarity with Black Lives Matter, including Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner.

Public statements by senior UK politicians

Then–Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he was “appalled and sickened” by what happened to George Floyd, acknowledging that black and minority ethnic groups face discrimination in education, employment, and criminal justice, and that there was “so much more to do in eradicating prejudice and creating opportunity.”

Keir Starmer (then Labour leader, now PM) and Angela Rayner said they were “shocked and angered” by Floyd’s death, framed it as part of a wider pattern of racism, and argued that it should “shine a light” on racism in the UK as well, explicitly criticising Donald Trump’s response.

Police chiefs across the UK issued a joint statement saying they “stand alongside all those across the globe who are appalled and horrified by the way George Floyd lost his life” and calling for “justice and accountability,” while stressing UK “policing by consent” and the need to tackle bias and racism.

Individual MPs, such as Conservative MP Luke Evans, wrote to constituents describing Floyd’s death as distressing, calling racism “abhorrent,” supporting the right to peaceful protest, but condemning violence and criminal damage associated with some protests.

Parliamentary and party-level gestures

The UK Parliament (Commons and Lords) held a minute’s silence in memory of George Floyd, explicitly linking it to the global protests against his killing.[bbc]
Labour highlighted its stance with a public statement and images: the party’s official account published “Our MPs take the knee for George Floyd. His death must be a catalyst for change,” saying Labour “stands with those opposing racism and oppression in the UK and across the world.”

Social-media tallies later pointed out that George Floyd was mentioned far more often in parliamentary proceedings than some UK victims of violent crime (e.g., one widely shared post claimed 19 mentions for Floyd versus 3 for Henry Nowak), which has been used in current debates to criticise political priorities.

UK politicians who took the knee

Keir Starmer released a photo of himself kneeling alongside Angela Rayner in a meeting room in Parliament, posting the caption: “We kneel with all those opposing anti-Black racism.

Labour MPs collectively “took the knee” in Parliament; the party circulated images and reiterated that Floyd’s death should be a “catalyst for change” against racism and oppression.

Labour MP Dawn Butler and others posted photographs of themselves taking the knee outside Parliament in solidarity with Black Lives Matter, explicitly connected to Floyd’s death.

Overall pattern

The mainstream cross‑party centre of gravity in 2020 was to condemn the killing and acknowledge racism, with Labour and allied MPs going further in linking Floyd’s death to systemic issues in the UK and in adopting BLM symbolism (kneeling).

The Conservative government emphasised sympathy for Floyd and the importance of tackling discrimination, but also stressed law and order, distancing itself from some aspects of BLM protests and generally avoiding “taking the knee” as a formal political gesture.

In subsequent years, “taking the knee for George Floyd” has become a reference point in UK political arguments about crime, race, and perceived double standards, with critics invoking it to attack Labour and some Conservatives defending their refusal to participate.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

The accusation of racism is so powerful that it enables you to stab a man and have him handcuffed by the police as he bleeds to death.

[David May @mayd]

@StevenEdginton If Burnham wins, Britain will be lurching from crisis to crisis. He will be leading the socialist Childrens' Crusade that is @UKLabour, and together they will trigger a financial crisis at some point.

[David May @mayd]

@Tom_Rowsell @NationalReilly might be shocked to learn that @UKLabour was divided over the issue of Britain joining the EEC, and the unions—reflecting the opinions of their working-class members—strongly opposed joining.

[Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 @PaulineHansonOz]

Labor Minister Tanya Plibersek says Labor has “cut” migration by 45%. Does this look like a cut to you?

The number of migrants in the country has only reached record highs since Labor came into power.

It’s now at all time record of 2.6 million temporary visa holders in the country (excluding tourists, crew and transit visas).

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

Senior figures at Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, under the command of Andy Burnham, have cautioned firefighters who support Reform UK over their political views.

In a further chilling assault on free speech, staff have also effectively been urged in an email to report colleagues who support Reform.

Fire brigade bosses have also said they are seeking legal advice on what to do about firefighters who decide to stand as Reform UK candidates. This is despite the fact that, unlike police officers, there is no legal bar preventing firefighters from participating in national or local politics.

In their email, fire brigade bosses Mr Petch and Ms Ahmed said: ’We are aware that some staff members have chosen to represent Reform UK in their local areas. We know this may cause concern within our network and wider.

’The individuals involved have been spoken to, to make it clear that as members of GMFRS (Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service) our core values and professional behaviours must be displayed at all times.

’The service is currently seeking formal legal guidance… to ensure we are protected from all perspectives and that our inclusive culture remains safe.

‘Our priority is and always will be ensuring that every member of this network feels supported, respected and safe at work.’

They also confirmed that they would be consulting the Fire Brigades Union on the matter.

In his role as Mayor of Greater Manchester, @AndyBurnhamGM — who is also tipped by some to be a future Prime Minister if he wins the Makerfield by-election — is also Greater Manchester’s Fire Commissioner, responsible for overseeing the service.

General Secretary of the Free Speech Union, Lord Young of Acton, has now written to Mr Burnham to raise concerns about the chilling effect this has on free speech.

Lord Young said that the ‘clear implication’ of the email from the fire brigade bosses was that ‘representing Reform UK constitutes an inherent threat to the institution’s culture and values and is to be treated as morally suspect’. He also highlighted that no action appears to have been taken against firefighters who support other political parties.

The letter also states: ‘Staff are further invited to report colleagues who support any groups that go against the service’s values, which effectively amounts to an instruction to inform on colleagues for their political beliefs.

’The email will create a chilling effect on the free speech of GMFRS employees who support Reform.

’The practical effect is that a public fire and rescue service governed by you is treating the lawful political activity of your electoral opponents as a reputational risk to their employer.

‘Regardless of whether this reflects your instruction, it reflects your governance; and a public office-holder who permits his institution to demonise or chill the speech and political activity of those who support his principal electoral rival cannot claim to be discharging that office with the impartiality it demands.’

Read more below 👇

[David May @mayd]

@TimpanoNathan @SkyNews @TrevorPTweets Thanks. I did not know that. You just pushed my admiration for @TrevorPTweets to a higher level!

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

🚨 Astonishingly, the heads of the Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service’s (GMFRS) ‘race and faith’ network have sent an email to firefighters, targeting staff members standing as candidates for Reform UK.

The email stated these individuals were "spoken to" and that management is seeking "legal guidance" to protect their "inclusive culture."

Sending an anti-Reform UK political broadcast on public systems during a regulated election period is a shocking breach of electoral neutrality and is unlawful.

Firefighters have every legal right to stand for election.

Hounding staff for lawful political views is unacceptable and is proof of the exact perception that anyone questioning an aggressive DEI agenda will be chased out of their job.

I have written to Chief Fire Officer Dave Russel demanding answers.

Petch and Ahmed - the network heads responsible - appear to have committed gross misconduct and should be dismissed.

GMFRS must apologize to Reform UK and the affected staff.

We have given GMFRS until Wednesday to answer 8 specific demands, including providing transcripts of what was said to our candidates and explaining why these network heads are permitted to weaponize IT systems.

I am also calling on HMICFRS (@HMICFRS) and the Electoral Commission (@ElectoralCommUK) to urgently investigate this unlawful breach.

Full letter below. 👇

[Andrew Neil @afneil]

Grim times for Britain’s defence establishment.
An upcoming report by Parliament’s Public Accounts committee is thought to conclude that the British Army’s troubled Ajax armoured vehicle may never make it onto the battlefield because it is not ‘fit for purpose’.
Over £6 billion has been spent on the Ajax programme. It should have started service in 2017. It is still not deployed. It has been plagued with issues, including leaving soldiers vomiting and with permanent hearing damage during field trials.
This latest report discloses that soldiers have been instructed to conduct maintenance checks every time they stop the vehicle. Which is hardly realistic when operating Ajax for long periods in combat.
Another day, another defence procurement and resources shambles. Tory, Labour and Lib Dem politicians should hang their heads in shame for presiding over what is now a national scandal.

[Andrew Neil @afneil]

Wow! Just wow!

[David May @mayd]

Good news.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

Imagine telling the police you’d been stabbed as your attacker stood by with his family.

The officer replies “I don’t think you have mate”.

The police handcuff you and read you your rights.

As you bleed to death.

RIP Henry.

We will work tirelessly to ensure nobody else suffers your fate.

[Dominic Cummings @Dominic2306]

Davey supported all the mad bullshit over BLM, convicted criminal George Floyd, ‘structural racism’ and all the maddest bullshit from the maddest parts of California’s communist loony bin.
He supported all the changes to police and every other institution which have made us an international joke.
He supported the Boriswave and the importing of thousands of sex criminals.
He supported the continued coverup of the grooming Gangs which is why he wants to ban X and impose censorship.
Davey Starmer etc need censorship so they can continue importing millions from Africa and the worst parts of South Asia.
Until we retire them they will continue wrecking the country

[David May @mayd]

@AlfieVille @SpeechUnion I for one would like to know. 🤔

[Harrison Pitt @Harry_pitt]

This article is a straightforward case of anti-white prejudice itself.

No other group is ever told that its collective self-defence rights are dangerous.

At this point, ‘racist’ basically just means ‘averse to conquest and replacement.’

[Morgoth @MorgothsReview]

It's grotesque how they try to cynically use the 'parents' wishes' as a magic forcefield to neutralize the issue.