now newsbird. dev is the easiest way to promote your startup. just submit your landing page url, and our AI will validate and create a card for it. for free and without login
@ThePrimeagen this is why I prefer Cursor. while CC or Codex only give you agents, in Cursor you get agents + tab completion. They’re different paradigms, and it’s really good to have them both
i am using supermaven again and i have something to say about this whole AI thing.
I think as a group (swe) we rushed so fast into Agents when inline autocomplete + actual skills is crazy. A good autocomplete that is fast like supermaven actually makes marked proficiency gains, while saving me from cognitive debt that comes from agents.
With agents you reach a point where you must fully rely on their output and your grip on the codebase slips. Its insane how good cursor Tab is. Seriously, I think we had something that genuinely makes improvement to ones code ability (if you have it). Truly acts as a multiplier, and we left it in the dust because it is not sexy.
hurts me on the inside.
Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action.
Reviews generally average $15–25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.
@marclou Totally agree. I built a mobile app to track habits like these + deep work sessions. Made it mainly for myself, but it’s now free for anyone to try: https://t.co/hnEbMEiNMa
@cnakazawa it really depends on the use case…I would prefer squash merging every time for short lived branches but there are other scenarios where you probably want to keep history