@BradCallag49647@JesseKellyDC I think that we can assume that our top military people have looked into this in detail, have drafted possible plans, and that the President has decided not to do it. Why would he decide not to do it? Please give some thought to that one.
@JesseKellyDC Is there any source of which you are aware that spells out in some detail what would likely be needed to "take over the Strait" and, presumably, hold onto it? All that I hear is generalities. Looking for useful information.
@vermontexan@AlexBerenson@nytimes In a world in which our time is limited and we have to choose what is worthwhile, it doesn't even come close. The "information" it provides is inaccurate and there is no wisdom.
@hughhewitt This it's not a reminder of anything. It's fantasy, dark fantasy. He's asking us to imagine a number of things that are not close to being true and never have been.
@JamesKozlowsk19@VDHanson I'm not sure what you mean. I'm disappointed in Victor Davis Hanson because he's not providing me useful information with which to form an informed opinion concerning this war. I expected better of him.
@FedRecruiter@VDHanson What is his analysis as to what would happen if the United States unleashed the type of bombing program against Iran that he discusses?
@F9C5G3B@VDHanson What is his analysis as to what would happen if the United States unleashed the type of bombing program against Iran that he discusses?
@HHSLinks@hughhewitt@EliLake It would be useful, and certainly refreshing, if you had a guest on your show who provided perspective and probably disagreement, rather than the same old people saying the same old things. Suggest you ask John Mearsheimer or Daniel Davis. We all might learn something.
@ClayTravis Regardless of who the president is, it's a terrible inconvenience to all of the fans attending the game. For a big-time game, especially a playoff game, there are already enough inconveniences that a fan must put up with.