Co-Founder & VP Growth @BeyondFunded and @AxestreetGroup.
Are you a funded trader wondering what's next? Let's chat!
You:
Funded 3 months
3 payouts
DMs OK.
Only amateurs complain when consistency is demanded of them.
True professionals, however, are consumed by the thought and process of engineering consistency within themselves at the highest level. @AxestreetGroup#trading#TradingStrategy#FOREX
Bobby Brannen, a 21-year-old man, has opened a disability-focused fitness center in New York, and this may be one of the most beautiful things I’ve seen in a long time.
He’s creating a place for children who might otherwise be left out of traditional fitness centers. A place where they can participate, learn about fitness, grow stronger, and most importantly, feel like they belong.
At only 21 years old, Bobby is already showing the world what inclusion looks like when it comes from the heart.
Bobby, my friend, you have a beautiful soul. The world needs more people who see the children standing on the sidelines and simply say, “Come on. There’s a place for you here, too.” ❤️
🚨“Don’t be too harsh on her, It’s her opinion. She got fired and all these things which I don’t want for her. I pray she experiences the love of God”
~~ 🗣️ Jeremy Doku on the journalist that criticized him during his Wife’s childbirth
👀🇦🇷 Después de decir que esta vez el arbitraje no influyó, me pidieron revisar el partido con detalle y encontré esto.
Enzo Fernández, autor del gol del empate de Argentina, no debió terminar el encuentro.
Al minuto 3 lanzó un codazo en la nuca a un jugador inglés, sin ninguna posibilidad de disputar el balón. Si se hubiera aplicado el mismo rigor arbitral que vimos contra Suiza y Egipto, esa acción perfectamente pudo terminar en expulsión. Pero no solo no fue roja… ni siquiera fue amarilla.
Minutos después, el mismo Enzo cortó un contragolpe de Inglaterra con una zancadilla al borde del área. ¿La sanción? Tampoco hubo amarilla.
Desde el primer tiempo, Enzo debió estar expulsado. Si una acción así hubiera sido contra Messi, difícilmente el infractor se salvaría.
Por cierto, guarden el video porque la FIFA los anda borrando.
@TritonTrades Spot on!
Verified traders should be moving toward real capital access, not getting funneled into stricter DLL rules the moment they prove they’re profitable.
We’re looking for serious traders that have proven long term viability while generating risk adjusted returns.
The unfortunate events that occurred with @Alpha_Futures_ today are more of a reason why proven traders should be deploying their prop firm withdrawals into live accounts & compounding capital that they truly own!
The “responsible trader program” trap is real and it’s the clearest sign a firm sees you as a liability the moment you win.
Funded traders don’t need more restrictions after proving themselves. They need a path to bigger capital. That’s the whole thesis behind Beyond Funded.
Moved live the day before a 45K payout...
It is what it is but I still haven’t received the first 45K payout so is that forfeited too even though it was approved and withdrawn from my accounts?
@salmanmunir96 Imagine depositing 1k and receiving 10x ($10,000) the buying power with 2% scaling events. Imagine how that compounds🤯
This is the advancement path that we’re offering exclusively for funded prop traders that have risk adjusted performance.
The frustration here isn’t irrational it’s a signal. Funded traders shouldn’t feel punished for succeeding on sim. There’s a real opportunity for firms (or tools layered on top of firms) to make the live transition preserve what you’ve earned instead of wiping it.
FYI I don’t think that being moved live shouldn’t be the end goal. It absolutely should. We can’t stay on sim forever, as much as I’d love to 🤣
I understand that props have to build a sustainable business so that we can all profit off it, they have to make their money too.
My only issue is when you’re about to lock in a payout and get moved, it is annoying. I don’t care what anyone says. We are allowed to voice our opinions 😭
A lot of this ‘complaining’ is actually frustration that our hard work just gets taken off us and we have to start again. I’m not sure about every single prop firm but the ones I’ve been moved live, I have built buffers and a good amount of profit on sim and it gets taken away for a live account on which I have to start from scratch.
It’s fine for some people but are we not allowed to be annoyed by anything lol.
No one is saying prop firm owners should have a complete overhaul of their business model just because we are slightly irritated at something 🤣🤣
That being said I do think live should be the end goal, if the live accounts have a good set of rules then it’s fine I guess. Just my two pence live stans don’t come at me pls
@_sabah7 This whole thread proves why funded traders need their own account running alongside the prop firm grind. Your hard work shouldn’t live and die by one firm’s policy. We help funded traders 10x their capital in real accounts so your progress is actually yours.