@ZenomTrader@tradermike1234 R:R and win rate are not separate, they are connected. When you take profits earlier win rate increases but it's totally depending on the overall system if that's actually beneficial long term or not. One needs to test this.
There is no correct answer here.
@aleabitoreddit Elon uses IPO upside to buy more upside for spacex stock... totally worth it if this can keep spacex pumping. Value of Cursor is surprisingly irrelevant
So as there are no links to actual source here, here is the info:
Itโs Invested by Aleph, Episode 62, hosted by Michael Eisenberg, with guest David Magerman.
Episode title on Alephโs page: โDavid Magerman on Building Renaissance Technologies, Why AI is โAn Automatic Machine Gun Weโre Giving Children,โ and Sacrificing Relationships for Success.โ The YouTube-style title shown in the post is โHe Built the Most Successful Hedge Fund in History: โWeโre Not Here to Help Americaโ | Invested.โ
@QuantifiedStrat Long-only right?
Works well because our economic system requires growth or it collapses therefore stocks always go up long term (or the system collapses and all govenrnents do everything possible to avoid it so stocks go up)
This is good idea but there is one big flaw: Your observation period basically dictates your result. For index funds profits are mostly stable but then there are crash periods where you would be crushed if you would be 100% in index funds. If you compare past months index funds would dominate as there has been so strong uptrend. Same goes with trading profits, depending on your trading style some periods are profitable some are not.