If you are involved in abortion care in Virginia, we are moving on to stage 2 of our research. Please feel free to reach out ([email protected]) if you would like to inform a report like this one (4/4).
Participants reported that onerous consent forms that required multiple signatures took time away from patients and increased burden on staff. Thus, these requirements not only restrict patient access to health care but also make it more likely that providers will burn out (3/4)
Can ELSI play a role in the positive analysis of genomics? or Is ELSI limited to Frankenstein-like conversations? Examples of the former please. N.B. I understand that there are risks to genomics.
AND 4. Participants wanted their hcps to be more aware of these types of results, and more straightforward about the knowledge they did and did not have. (5/5)
Stay tuned for the clinical results of the IDENTIFY study.
Perspectives from patients with noninvasive prenatal test results that may indicate maternal cancer are out now in Prenatal Diagnosis @ISPDHQ
https://t.co/lIjypsQCHh
@DianaBianchiMD@NHGRI@theNCI
We find: (1/5)
How will climate change actually impact species? @MafaldaSFe, my partner Tim Thurman, @jeffreymgood and a wonderful team have a new paper out in @ScienceMagazine πππ
Yes! And thinking about how "the sociopolitical meaning of blonde as genetically superior, desirable" is reproduced in egg donation markets where potential parents desire blond donors and fertility clinics market the availability of these blond donors.
I have been interviewing pregnant people who get inconclusive NIPT results before and after they take part in this NIH study. Our qualitative interviews have important implications for how providers consent people to NIPT.
https://t.co/Lz2f14VDoo
I talked with GenePod @GIMJournal about the importance of moving beyond whether or not to disclose secondary genomic findings in children to how to disclose. https://t.co/VfRVH9frse