@TejasKumar_ when I get my agents to send out cfps en masse
using something like a tool that can use the browser on my behalf, but with good safeguards and approvals
if only there was a product like this
Wasm REPL:
https://t.co/4sVmpR4hwT
Thanks to how portable the original QuickJS is (and to the modern C tooling brought in by quickjs-ng) it turned into a fun weekend project.
Get the cursed binaries here:
https://t.co/CYt8otaasD
I always wanted to recompile a browser and make arrays start at 1 to see how the web breaks.
While an entire browser is a bit too much work, a compact JS engine is pretty doable.
Meet Qu1ckJS - a JS engine where indexed collections start at 1!
My conference tech demo accidentally turned into https://t.co/F32Y8ihfPV
I always wanted to build a full-featured screen recorder based purely on web standards. Turns out, you can fit recording, processing and encoding in under 200kb (probably could have pushed it even lower).
It started with playing around with html-in-canvas, however the end product contains none at all.
Videos are directly saved into a local folder (or OPFS for Firefox and Safari).
Encode into a bunch of cool formats with WebCodecs! There's even a floating recording window.
Just went to report a bug in @voidzerodev formatter. Spent 30 minutes setting up a classic reproduction repo.
Then discovered https://t.co/uVShJzyoa5 has an option to compare with prettier and if there's a difference IT FILLS OUT THE ISSUE TEMPLATE FOR YOU
I absolutely love it
spent 6 months trying to figure out pricing for my developer products: per-seat, usage based, "contact sales"?
introducing promise-based billing. honestly IMO it's the most honest pricing model in tech:
- generous free tier for sync APIs
- real customers pay for promises
@thekitze yeah, that + zus
you can also scheme and get down to like ≈8% and no zus, but that's more dodgy + capped at 120k PLN yearly
see stuff like https://t.co/msGOBIRdL7