@MikeStillAwake Just like the dirty break, functionally that is what it does. But, I do think some in DSA take the surrogate idea seriously. The problem is that the strategy is wrong. For some it is dishonest though yes.
This is because we’ve synthesized on electoral strategy. I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say party surrogate is, while not necessarily a consensus, an overwhelmingly popular position that isn’t going away anytime soon. There isn’t really a notable ‘clean break now’ faction.
There are essentially two paths, and this is one of them. It will not work. I hope that as the warning signs against this strategy increasingly blare, it will be possible for the movement to shift to the other path, where we rely primarily on movements not fake allies.
why are a lot of left-wing people unnerved by this. he’s going to be totally ratfucked by Albany if he doesn’t at least try to play nice and there is no amount of aurafarming that can overcome that
Is the “dirty break” still a thing? What’s the hold up, actually? Is there really a perspective for a perfect time coming up just around the corner or what?
We must also recognize the broader political context in which our contract struggle is playing out—while the U.S. Postal Service is not funded directly by the government, we should expect to fight Trump and DOGE, writes letter carrier Rob Darakjian: https://t.co/lxt9zvR3Ak
@escargotpro_@luxeprogressive But I feel this isn’t the main problem with running on their ballot line. The issue is that socialists are gradually seen by most people as a certain type of Democrat, and not as an alternative to + against the two parties.
Trying to make sense of the catastrophic daily news cycle? Our socialist newspaper can help make sense of the world, and we give ordinary people the strategy & tactics we need to fight back against the brutal exploitation of capitalism.
Subscribe today! https://t.co/omZRYtrSsn
Our post-election report is out today! Voters across party lines wanted to see major changes in politics and the economy — but they saw Democrats as committed to upholding the system.
Getting unexpected texts from family members asking if it’s possible Bernie might launch an actual working class party.
There’s real excitement for something different all across the country
A good article by Kshama Sawant from 2016 about supporting Jill Stein. The political balance and approach is similar to how we raise these points now. https://t.co/Wmf5q0hq01
@PatrickTShep What I mean is, why and how did the parties develop in this way in American history? I think the, I guess, “traditional” view you are opposing here is pretty good for understanding the development and changes they underwent as parties…
There’s no way to arrive at this idea by looking at a real historical process. You can only discover this idea if you already have a chosen political strategy, and that strategy needs some kind of theoretical justification.
Contrary to what the Democrats said at the time, the right wing was not defeated when Trump lost in 2020, in fact it grew under Biden. This is exactly what socialists warned would happen. The Democrats can’t stop the right, but mass protests and working-class action can.
this is the most important election of your life until the next one at which point the stakes of this election will seem meaningless in comparison. elections is a lot like dragon ball z in that respect
I’m voting for Stein but really disagree with the “punish the Democrats” argument. They will not “learn” anything from losing because they’re not dumb. They like winning elections, sure, but they like imperialism more.
@justin0x77D@rsdlpb_fan Justin, I feel this particular comment is out of the blue and not ignoring the many responses to these points in this discussion. Don’t forget, you are the ones innovating on electoral tactics here, we are raising the same general political points we have in past elections.