@DietCoke_Esq you want the specter of fear. you want the anticipation of the meeting to underscore the seriousness. a calendar invite the next day for 'discussion' with minimal information. the meeting is light touch. And if that doesn't work, hellfire and damnation.
@BestBuySupport hey someone at Best Buy fulfillment keeps stealing my Apple Watch. I’ve ordered one and it came with no watch. The reship is also missing the watch. The box is fine it was shipped in, but both boxes have been slit and the watch removed. Please contact me.
@FloridaManEsq_ 1) Arthur from Nashville 2) Director of Conflicts and New Business Intake 3) Find a niche area of law and become extremely useful in it
@RileeDHarrison the winner cases were usually 1) you got the call first, which was hard in a saturated market or 2) the client called because they were mad at the insurance company and didn't realize the value of the case.
Apparently @SamsungUS is unable to assist with manufacturing defects which are cosmetic in nature. Got these panels 7 months ago, and they’re falling apart. Samsung’s solution? Buy more.
@RilezTweetsEsq My late contracts professor warned us of this 1L year: even if you're right, once you fall into lawyer mode, it's time to sue for peace.
@KSVesq In addition to not disclosing the identity of the client, comment 4 forbids providing enough information generally about the representation that a third party could figure it out. That being said, I think most cases can still be generalized enough to discuss without violating 1.6
The absolute worst is when they have a citation for the case and say its stands for proposition "x" when in fact it stands for the opposite. Real gut punch.