@DavidRau101@CBrowns79@briannalyman2@abbydphillip We don't know every example, therefore it's not rare! Just like we don't know how many unicorns exist in the wild, so they can't be rare or imaginary right?
@CanEvangelical@WesleyLHuff Correct, but how would it give them the ability to find HISTORICAL connections? Comparing and contrasting has little to do with historical accuracy. Maybe I'm not understanding the point you're making?
@WesleyLHuff You think the critique of McGrew's work is held to her being from a different field of work? Either you're extremely ignorant of the critiques of her work, or you're misleading your audience...
@marcado_razon@KennethLPearce I don't understand your point here. Our ideas about anything objective have no bearing on the "objectiveness". Why would us being temporary even come into the equation?
@Johnny2Fingersz@maklelan@libsoftiktok@FoxNews You think that confused me? And there's that insult again, not sure what you think you're implying, but it's not sticking the way you think it is.