In one year, the entire Jewish world will celebrate the completion of the current page-by-page study cycle of the Babylonian Talmud. It is one of the most unique events in human civilization and takes place every 7.5 years. I'll see you all at MetLife Stadium for the big party.
Although deleted, the NAMP document can still be accessed through the Wayback Machine. There are some really crazy things inside.
First, Kabbani redefines antisemitism out of existence. Citing Georgetown professor John Esposito, he argues that "Semitism" originally referred to speakers of Semitic languages, which includes Arabs, so Islamophobia is "a modern kind of antisemitism." The word coined to describe anti-Jewish hatred gets repurposed into something Muslims primarily suffer from.
Esposito happens to be a self-described "very close friend" and longtime defender of Sami Al-Arian, the convicted Palestinian Islamic Jihad financier who was deported to Turkey.
Second, Kabbani doesn't just call the IDF a terrorist organization. He lists sixteen "genocides" he attributes to "Zionist terrorist groups including the IDF" since 1947 — none of which were even remotely close to actual genocide, obviously.
These include Haifa, Deir Yassin, Tantura, Al-Lydd, Qibya, Kafr Qasim, Khan Younis, Abou Zaabal, Bahr al-Baqar, Sabra and Shatila, Al-Aqsa, The Cave of the Patriarchs, Qana, Jenin, Gaza in 2008, 2012, and 2014. And the ongoing "Gaza genocide" now.
Third, Kabbani writes that "not a single Israeli infant was a casualty during the said attacks" and that the one child who died "occurred two days following the attack, with circumstances involving IDF gunfire."
Yet Amnesty International — no friend of Isrel — has documented at least 36 Israeli children murdered that day. And yes, one infant was decapitated.
Despite all this, NAMP is still affiliated with 16 of Britain's 43 police forces. The College of Policing still calls them "an important part of policing."
Just speaking for myself here, but if I had been exposed as having an SS tattoo on my chest for 18 years, I would have the good sense not to accuse my political opponents of being slaves to the Jews
The more I sit down and talk to Jewish people, the more I realize how maligned they are.
The lies the JQ crowd now tell about me are similar to those they tell about Jews.
I was part of that crowd, but now I'm glad to say I'm no longer an antisemite.
@jacklanger@JakeTurx
2018: “Believe all women”
2023: “Believe all women, unless they’re a Jew”
2026: “Believe all women, unless they’re accusing a total lowlife with a concentration camp guard tattoo”
“Doctors in London told a colleague they'd let a dying Israeli die in the ER rather than treat him. So he's leaving. So is a pediatrician, a GP, a heart surgeon in Montreal.
The Jews leaving the West aren't random. They're the ones who save your life at 2am.”
https://t.co/exRcQlV9Lw
Please, for the love of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, STOP USING AI FLYERS!!!!! They all look the same: Terrible. AI Slop. Flat. Robotic. STOPPPPP.
Thank you,
From a Millennial who wants Canva flyers to come back
@TalHartuv Hi, Tal, I'm a British-born Palestinan who was stabbed 19 times by an Israeli terrorist. Another chopped up my friend in front of my eyes. A few just got out from the prison, bring abused and raped. They were paid a salary for years by the UK gov.
Could you tweet this too???🙏
This is far longer than my typical post, but it tells an important story of what appears to be an attempt by leadership at Massey College to censor a major conference on antisemitism, leading to the resignation of one of its senior fellows.
The disappointment that greeted Mark Carney’s antisemitism speech this week is partly a function of a Jewish community that has been facing real threats for months, with fears that our governments and institutions have been unwilling to confront them directly and honestly. Hours before the Carney speech, I received a note from Peter Biro, a Toronto lawyer and longtime senior fellow at the University of Toronto’s Massey College, that provided a tangible example of the harm. Biro, facing what appears to have been an attempt by Massey College leadership to censor a major antisemitism conference planned for this fall, resigned his fellowship rather than succumb to it.
Biro proposed, organized, and committed to personally fund a one-day conference, “Antisemitism in Our ‘Free and Democratic Society’: A Canary’s Song,” co-presented with the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights and featuring Deborah Lipstadt, Deborah Lyons, and Irwin Cotler, among others. According to his resignation letter, which I am sharing here with his permission, the College told him it had never approved the event and insisted on appointing an advisory committee to review, curate, and approve a version of the program that fit the College’s “mission and approach.” When he asked who had raised concerns and whether such a committee had any precedent, he says he received no answer.
Biro calls the stated objection false and a pretext. The real concern, he argues, is the substance: how antisemitism would be examined, by whom, and whether a human rights centre founded by a Jewish and Zionist lawyer was an acceptable partner. That objection makes little sense, since the College itself partnered with the very same centre only months ago. In Biro’s words, the committee “looks and feels less like prudent corporate governance and more like antisemitism.” Read the letter and judge for yourself.
Here is the part that should worry everyone. An academic institution responded to a conference on antisemitism, organized by one of its own fellows and featuring some of the world’s most notable antisemitism scholars, by insisting that an oversight committee was needed to decide whether the subject was being handled appropriately. I’ve organized many conferences and never had university leadership intervene in this manner. Massey College, much like Mark Carney, had a chance to lead, but both failed to meet the moment. The conference will go on in Toronto on September 15. The stain on Massey College will not come off as easily.
You cannot hate the UN enough.
This interview with UN whistleblower Emma Reilly needs to be seen.
She worked inside the UN’s Human Rights Office and exposed how the organization has repeatedly covered up systematic child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation by UN peacekeepers and staff around the world, especially in places like the Central African Republic, Haiti, and DR Congo.
Instead of protecting the victims (many of them children), senior officials protected the perpetrators and retaliated against those who tried to speak out.
This isn’t ancient history. It’s ongoing. And yet the story barely made headlines before it was buried again.
The UN loves to lecture the world about human rights while shielding its own people from accountability for some of the worst crimes imaginable. How many more whistleblowers have to be destroyed before people admit the entire system is rotten?
Big thanks to Ali Tabrizi @IAMALITABRIZI for actually asking the questions the mainstream media won’t touch.
The UN doesn’t need more money or more power. It needs to be dismantled and replaced.
The Jews Never Stole Land!
Oren Cahanovtc is an Israeli tour guide. He also makes YouTube videos. He posted a video asking for someone to provide the name of one piece of Arab land that was stolen before The 1948 War.
Oren asked if someone could identify a piece of stolen land and put it in the comments. The video has a half a million views, and yet, not a single person has ever provided the name of one piece of land that was stolen.
The Jewish people paid for every single piece of land where they built homes before The 1948 War. There is not one example of a stolen piece of land.
The Arabs started The 1948 War. After the war, a group of Arabs became refugees, and they lost their property during the course of the war. But that is not stealing. The Arabs were trying to destroy the Jewish communities and prevent them from gaining their freedom. After the war, it would have been literal suicide for the Jews to allow Arabs who attacked them to return to villages and keep attacking them. If the Arabs had never attacked, then there would never have been a single Arab refugee who lost property during a war.
I really want to know what they mean by collective liberation.
What exactly are they planning to liberate the Jews from collectively?
Somebody please ask that question the next time you run into someone who throws this at you.
Signed,
A Jew whose experience has taught her to be very nervous whenever revolutionaries start offering to liberate her